Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

[_Lemmie]

Louis Midgley Moksha • 24 minutes ago • edited

Moksha cannot seem to resist the urge to bring the hated for me that he celebrates on his home hate board and exhibited on Gina Colvin blog to sic et non. I urge him to cease doing this, and also cease playing the fool on sic et non. Often what he posts is just disgusting. For example his bizarre opinion that the fake up and down voters are merely some clever fun rather than truly disgusting as Professor Peterson point out to him.
•
Reply
•

http://disq.us/p/2a72zcx

Midgley’s projection of what are clearly his own psychological issues is fascinating. Note that the above was in response to this:

Moksha Louis Midgley • 5 hours ago

1. I agree that LDS people can be very civil, so that makes my question even more poignant of why some regular posters do no have a mode of proper behavior on this blog. An unending series of insults would not be forthcoming from a civil LDS discourse (Dag nabbit, we have a blog not a discourse!!!)

2. I suppose a predators license would exempt certain posters from normal civil behavior. I liked your example of a wolf and its prey.

No mention of Colvin, no mention of up and down posting, no mention of MD, no mention of playing the fool.

My guess is Midgley knows he acted like a fool on Colvin’s blog and he knows he did it again over the voting, but he can’t admit it so he projects his own behavior, over and over, onto poster after poster after poster. It’s sad.

[_Gadianton]

while she detests--he used the word hates--what I have written.

If for no other reason, knowing this was well worth the expense and effort involved in my recent, and most likely, last visit to Aotearoa/New Zealand

.

more evidence of his duplicitous motives.

If the up and downvoting weren't enough to seal the deal already.

[_Dr LOD]

LCM- I suppose a predators license would exempt certain posters from normal civil behavior.

One would have to ask the moderator of SeN for such a license. Apparently Professor Midgley has one in his possession.

[_Doctor CamNC4Me]

In response to a benign post by Dowsin' Dan, Lunatic Lou opens up the comments section with this missive:

"Why is gemli not telling Latter-day Saints that we reject at least the kind of science that Professor Peterson has mentioned today, since those with faith in God cannot possibly both believe in God and entertain a positive view of what he imagines as science. Recently gemli seems to have neglected to pounce on every opportunity to promote his dogmatic scientism. Has his own effort to avoid COVID-19 and, at his age, a possible exit, made him a bit less dogmatic and a bit more thoughtful?"

The reader will note gemli hadn't even appeared in the comments section, and further Lunatic Louis Midgley starts speculating about gemli's health and mortality. His obsession and harassment of gemli is bananas.

What in the ever living “F” is wrong with that Mormon?

- Doc

[_Philo Sofee]

Doc Cam
What in the ever living ____ is wrong with that Mormon?

His Mormon theology. It completely exempts him so he can act like his own God, mean, contemptible, vicious, and full of hate. He is practicing for his own coronation as god of his own creation. Why wait for then when one can begin practicing to be god here and now? He is Jehovah mini-me, of course.

[_Doctor CamNC4Me]

Today I was watching Netflix’s ‘Hannibal’ and a scene came up that involved pigs. I was reminded of the frequent refrences to this site as sty, and one in particular where Kiwi57 called Dr. Shades the ‘head boar’. So I conducted a quick google using this search parameter:

site:www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeterson/ shades

And came up with this hit, which kind of intrigued me:

https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... night.html

In the comments section where Dreadful Dan and his buddies were being absolutely terrible to the congenial Dr. Shades, Lyin’ Louis Midgley made this solemn vow to Dr. Shades:

“I right now affirm again that I will never reveal your name, or anything I may know about you.”

and

“I will say again that I will not reveal his real name.“

Now. We all know that not only has Lyin’ Lou doxxed Dr. Shades, but so has Kiwi57. And Dreadful Dan has let it stand, which is ironic because he said this:

“I have precisely no interest in "doxxing" you.”

Anyway. The entire comments section is psychologically fascinating. Mr. Peterson goes on and on about Dr. Shades’ lack of moderating “the critics”, which might as well be himself talking about his own blog.

To summarize. Louis Midgley lied and doxxed Dr. Shades. Kiwi57 doxxed Dr. Shades. Mr. Peterson has allowed this to stand even though he can remove the doxxing, which he has done on other blog posts where Dr. Shades is doxxed. This is a violation of Disqus’ posting rules.

- Doc

[_Temp. Admin.]

Dr. Shades here, using the "Temp. Admin" account.

In response to a benign post by Dowsin' Dan, Lunatic Lou opens up the comments section with this missive:

Whoa there. . . I think you came very close to coining a new word. To wit, if someone flails about, attacking others who are entirely absent, can that person be considered a . . . "Lounatic?"

In the comments section where Dreadful Dan and his buddies were being absolutely terrible to the congenial Dr. Shades, Lyin’ Louis Midgley made this solemn vow to Dr. Shades:

“I right now affirm again that I will never reveal your name, or anything I may know about you.”

Interestingly, it was only last week that he made a post about me, in a thread in which I wasn't even present, telling everyone both my undergraduate degree, my specific field thereof, and the institution from which I'd earned it.

So much for the "or anything else I know" part.

[_moksha]

His obsession and harassment of gemli is bananas.

What in the ever living ____ is wrong with that Mormon?

- Doc

Lou is getting old. He likes arguing with Gemli and probably misses him.

[_moksha]

Louis Midgley Dr. Shades • 10 months ago • edited

And you think I lack scruples? I right now affirm again that I will never reveal your name, or anything I may know about you.

https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... qus_thread

I suppose this shows that even the strongest resolves can deteriorate when subjected to failing health and the whisperings of a cantankerous (and stubbornly invisible) old billy goat that follows you around the house asking for carrots and celery and insisting you count every upvote and downvote.

[Guest]

Up bright and early on this Sabbath day, Lousy Lou, who quite often moans about 'critics' coming to Dan's blog to, I dunno, disrupt the Spirit or whatever, calls on gemli to come to Dan's blog to, I dunno, disrupt the Spirit:

"Louis Midgley • an hour ago

I right now demand that our very own Village Atheist make at least a cameo appearance and answer this objection to his very blog item. Yes, I am demanding that gemli try to explain how he is "enlightened," while others are not? What exactly do we make out of the famous Cretan who claimed that "all Cretans are liars"?"

The only thing consistent about Lyin' Lou Midgley is his inconsistency and boorish behavior.

edit: It should be noted that BYU employs a professor who constantly craps on 'science'. A quote from the blog post that sent Lyin' Lou into an early morning tizzy:

"How can science, a human creation, “deliver” us from an amoral world? And in what would that “deliverance” consist? Can science make us free? Can it create good and evil? I doubt that Gray intends this, but I suppose that science can deliver us from nihilism, amorality, and determinism . . . by vaporizing us."

Vaporizing. Cool.

- Doc