My Interview with Brian Hauglid is Up!

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Shulem
_Emeritus
Posts: 12072
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 1:48 am

Re: My Interview with Brian Hauglid is Up!

Post by _Shulem »

Image
Gee wrote:theory, theory, theory, theory, theory, theory, theory, theory, theory, theory

Put up or shut up, Gee.

Accept the offer extended to you from Radio Free Mormon and meet your destiny!

Surely, you know, you're doomed!

You will be destroyed.

Image


:twisted:
_Dan Vogel
_Emeritus
Posts: 876
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 1:26 am

Re: My Interview with Brian Hauglid is Up!

Post by _Dan Vogel »

I listened to the whole interview and found Brian's discussion of his relationship with Gee interesting and sad. I'm reading his new essay on the Abraham material now.
I do not want you to think that I am very righteous, for I am not.
Joseph Smith (History of the Church 5:401)
_Doctor Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 8025
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: My Interview with Brian Hauglid is Up!

Post by _Doctor Scratch »

Another revealing comment:
DCP wrote:A teacher at BYU retired and, within days, came out of the closet as an unbeliever. (Many of us had been aware of his unbelief for several years.)
First, note the fact that DCP calls Hauglid a "teacher" rather than a "professor." But the key detail is the bit in parentheses: "Many of us." Yeah, of course: the "inner circle." So, they were just talking crap about Hauglid behind his back? Was Midgley assembling a "creepy dossier"? Whatever the case may be, at minimum they were gossiping with each other about this. But this sounds precisely like the kind of cabal that would rat somebody out to their bishop. Did the same "Many of us" know about the contact with the bishop? Or was that just Midgley going rogue?
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
_Dr Exiled
_Emeritus
Posts: 3616
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 3:48 am

Re: My Interview with Brian Hauglid is Up!

Post by _Dr Exiled »

But this sounds precisely like the kind of cabal that would rat somebody out to their bishop. Did the same "Many of us" know about the contact with the bishop? Or was that just Midgley going rogue?
The answer is obvious, Dr. Scratch. Yet, our hero and his compatriots won't admit it, won't be true to their religious selves. Anyone who has been on a mission knows that the church teaches that the good missionary rats out the rule breaking missionary. And those who don't will be punished if caught, as an example. So, with that ethos in mind, is it really too much of a stretch to think that Dr. P, arch-defender of the faith, would turn in Dr. Hauglid once he knew of the change in faith, especially since Dr. Hauglid was one of those Maxwellites? Of course he would! His idol, Packer, would demand this.
"Religion is about providing human community in the guise of solving problems that don’t exist or failing to solve problems that do and seeking to reconcile these contradictions and conceal the failures in bogus explanations otherwise known as theology." - Kishkumen 
_Gadianton
_Emeritus
Posts: 9947
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:12 am

Re: My Interview with Brian Hauglid is Up!

Post by _Gadianton »

I thought this was funny:

"(I already knew that the person was retiring, incidentally, and accordingly didn’t need to ask.)."

Actually, "Is he retired yet?" is EXACTLY the kind of question I'd expect someone to ask who knew he was retiring, rather than by someone who didn't have that on their radar at all.

That being said, it's being denied that he he is the one who wrote the email to Gee, although in another post he said that he contacted a few friends over it. Could his email have had an intermediary recipient who tacked on a couple of things that got to Gee?

I have no problem believing that he didn't compose the original email. While familiar with "GSTP", I don't recall him ever using that. Schryver, on the other hand, obsessively referred to this site as the GSTP. At any rate, it's unthinkable at this point that he doesn't know who wrote the original. Among the Mopologist elite, surely everyone knows who wrote that email by now.
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.

LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
_Dr Moore
_Emeritus
Posts: 849
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2019 5:19 am

Re: My Interview with Brian Hauglid is Up!

Post by _Dr Moore »

It seems pretty clear that Dr. Peterson denies having sent the email or called local authorities to come down on Brian. Why is it still a debate?
_Doctor Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 8025
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:44 pm

Re: My Interview with Brian Hauglid is Up!

Post by _Doctor Scratch »

Dr Moore wrote:
Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:54 am
It seems pretty clear that Dr. Peterson denies having sent the email or called local authorities to come down on Brian. Why is it still a debate?
Do you believe him, Dr. Moore? And it seems to me that the more salient point here is not whether or not DCP himself contacted the bishop, but, instead, the *role* that DCP has played in facilitating and/or encouraging such behavior.

“Inner circle,” no?
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
_Temp. Admin.
_Emeritus
Posts: 239
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2018 3:50 am

Re: My Interview with Brian Hauglid is Up!

Post by _Temp. Admin. »

Shulem" wrote:I’ll bet my bottom dollar John Gee is racist and doesn’t like blacks. No wonder he’s all too happy with keeping Anubis a slave. You’re a racist, John Gee! You’re a traitor to Egyptology and a shame. Your name will be dragged through the mud. You think Budge is the butt of jokes. No! The name Gee will forever be ranked as traitorous and racist against blacks and ancient Egypt.

Black lives matter! You go to hell, Gee, you racist hypocrite! Your name is dirt.
Dude, you throw around the "R" word WAAAAAY too liberally. You have NO PROOF that John Gee is a racist. It was Joseph Smith who labeled Anubis a slave, not John Gee.

In this politically-charged day and age, it behooves no one to frivolously accuse someone of being a racist without any hard proof. I hereby invite you to cease and desist doing so.
_I have a question
_Emeritus
Posts: 9749
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:01 am

Re: My Interview with Brian Hauglid is Up!

Post by _I have a question »

Doctor Scratch wrote:
Thu Jul 09, 2020 5:15 am
Dr Moore wrote:
Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:54 am
It seems pretty clear that Dr. Peterson denies having sent the email or called local authorities to come down on Brian. Why is it still a debate?
Do you believe him, Dr. Moore? And it seems to me that the more salient point here is not whether or not DCP himself contacted the bishop, but, instead, the *role* that DCP has played in facilitating and/or encouraging such behavior.

“Inner circle,” no?
Why not take him at his word and ask him to condemn Gee for calling on Dr Hauglid's local church authorities and employer to act to censure him?
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: My Interview with Brian Hauglid is Up!

Post by _moksha »

Shulem wrote:
Wed Jul 08, 2020 2:32 pm
John knows this. He does. He's miserable!
He works at BYU in a permanently funded position. He has a cadre of apologetic friends and a family. Why should he be miserable?
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
Post Reply