Three Powerful Books

[Guest]

Your integrity is really lacking, mental.

You know, this isn’t the first time I’ve had listen to this crap. As though my integrity waxes and wanes. Give me a break.

I’ve either got it or I don’t.

Or, as Morley suggested, don’t “score” his comments, and let him speak for himself.

I’m fine with that. Hey, anything substantive to add to the conversation Lemmie...besides being the resident gadfly?

Regards,
MG

[_mentalgymnast]

As I have already said I can only bear witness of my own experience. I am first person. I can’t speak for others in third person.

:rolleyes:

Honor may have at one time understood that language of the Spirit, but he has forgotten it or more likely reinterpreted it as being something else.

I explained why I said that. Read my posts.

Regards,
MG

[_mentalgymnast]

Blah, blah, blah...

You are so frickin’ predictable...

Regards,
MG

[_Morley]

MG. Let's see if I have this.

You speak the language of science, philosophy, and the spirit so can understand everything.

We just speak the language of the science and philosophy but can't understand the language of the spirit so we can't understand anything you're saying when you speak spirit language.

You and those of your tribe are superior in your understanding because of this.

Please correct me where I've got it wrong.

What is your understanding in regards to the language of the Spirit at this point in your life? Is God involved in that communication/process? As you listen to the language of a Spirit what is it that you hear and/or experience?

Does this mean I had it right?

[_Lemmie]

As I have already said I can only bear witness of my own experience. I am first person. I can’t speak for others in third person.

:rolleyes:

Honor may have at one time understood that language of the Spirit, but he has forgotten it or more likely reinterpreted it as being something else.

You are so frickin’ predictable...

Regards,
MG

I would hope so! It’s amazing how your lies are so easily caught. Almost as though people were reading what you say!

[Guest]

:rolleyes:

You are so frickin’ predictable...

Regards,
MG

I would hope so! It’s amazing how your lies are so easily caught. Almost as though people were reading what you say!

No lies. Again, go back and read my posts.

Now you’re muddying the waters. That’s predictable too. Thing is, I think you’re actually bright enough to know that. Yet you do it anyway. Go figure...

Regards,
MG

[_mentalgymnast]

Back to the OP. This thread has made it readily apparent why these three books won’t see much traction here.

Corbridge’s primary question number one gets in the way at the get go. At least with theists there would be some common ground to start from.

Took a long time and a long way to get there and figure it out, but we did.

Lesson learned.

Regards,
MG

[_Morley]

Back to the OP. This thread has made it readily apparent why these three books won’t see much traction here.

Corbridge’s primary question number one gets in the way at the get go. At least with theists there would be some common ground to start from.

Took a long time and a long way to get there and figure it out, but we did.

Lesson learned.

The lack of theists is not the problem, my friend. There are plenty of theists here.

[_mentalgymnast]

Back to the OP. This thread has made it readily apparent why these three books won’t see much traction here.

Corbridge’s primary question number one gets in the way at the get go. At least with theists there would be some common ground to start from.

Took a long time and a long way to get there and figure it out, but we did.

Lesson learned.

The lack of theists is not the problem, my friend. There are plenty of theists here.

Any idea how many of them participated in this thread?

Regards,
MG

[_Morley]

The lack of theists is not the problem, my friend. There are plenty of theists here.

Any idea how many of them participated in this thread?

Regards,
MG

I counted six in the first five pages. I stopped my tally after that. Of course for most folks, I have no idea.