Father Francis wrote: ↑Sat Apr 16, 2022 12:54 am
Shulem wrote: ↑Fri Apr 15, 2022 8:06 pm
She's a mighty fine ship, son.
Pray that Lehi doesn't drop his brass ball.
I've seen that painting a million times and it just occurred to me that how ripped that little kid is. Why?
Because Mormons love to romanticize and exaggerate things in order to increase their faith and validate testimony. According to the story, Lehi had two sons in the wilderness (Jacob & Joseph) so the young man in the painting can't be either of them for obvious reasons, he's too old and physically developed. But curious how he manages to find his place in front of Nephi and at the side of mother Sariah. I think the artist was attempting to create an ideal image of what was considered the perfect image of a righteous young man who keeps all the commandments (thou shalt not fist pump in the wee hours of the night) and look at those muscles and ripped abs! What a grip!
Doctor Steuss wrote: ↑Fri Apr 15, 2022 6:00 pm
*puts on apologist hat*The word for ship/boat in Hebrew is feminine.
Then there is this:
Google god wrote:Hebrew, at its core, is a gendered language. Every word in the ancient language is categorized as zachar, male, or nekevah, female. Every noun from furniture to food is either a he or a she, and every adjective and verb has a male and female form.
This leads me to think the language itself is categorized into two groups: male & female. But it doesn't lead me to think that a word within that group means it's referred to by that particular gender when in play. In fact, it seems there is some gender confusion or that the gender of the word is not translated into real life circumstances.
Example of
feminine noun:
Foreskin!
Example of
masculine noun:
Womb!
Go figure. I therefore don't see how the apologists can automatically justify Book of Mormon usage of female gender to ships just because the noun is feminine in the Hebrew. If there are no classic examples of gender being applied to seafaring vessels in Jewish literature prior to 600BC then there is nothing to support Smith's Book of Mormon translation other than
Late War and modern nautical expression.
Shulem wrote: ↑Sat Apr 16, 2022 3:34 pm
If there are no classic examples of gender being applied to seafaring vessels in Jewish literature prior to 600BC then there is nothing to support Smith's Book of Mormon translation other than
Late War and modern nautical expression.
And, if this be the case, then I think my accusation of Smith plagiarizing feminine terms that he was familiar with into ancient Jewish custom is an all NEW anachronism that needs to be thoroughly investigated by specialists whether they are apologists or critics.
I think we (critics) can get a lot of mileage out of this.