DCP takes a strange misogynistic shot at Kate “what’s-her-name” Kelly

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

Also October 2015

https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... riest.html

And

https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... -lies.html

There’s more, but you know, the little kitten will start mewing if we point out his obvious stupidities.

- Doc

[Kishkumen]

So is all of this repetitive copy and paste posting an effort to contradict Kelly’s opinion or validate it?

Sadly, the Mormon faith has become a place that incentivizes the survival of the least fit. Since strict obedience is demanded and harshly enforced, only the least talented, least articulate, least nuanced thinkers, least likely to take a stand against abuse, and the least courageous people thrive in the Church today.

[drumdude]

Where, for example, did she obtain ordination such that she can transmit it to anybody else? Where, in particular, did she gain Catholic ordination? In what sense is she Catholic, or authorized to insert herself into matters intimately involved not only with the administration of the Catholic Church but, much more significantly, with its most holy sacraments and liturgy?

DCP doesn’t want women to get into the club. No man has given them the secret decoder ring, password, and secret handshake. She’s not authorized!!

Never mind the fact that Mormons think Catholics are “playing pretend church” and their decoder rings aren’t genuine like the Mormon ones are.

Drink your ovaltine!

[IHAQ]

Given Kate Kelly hasn't been particularly prominent over the last few years, why does DCP keep bring her up for discussion? I can only think that mentioning her on his blog provides some kind of spike in hits, and so every time he needs to generate increased activity he regurgitates his same comment about "I haven't been thinking about Kate Kelly...". I can think of no other reason for it. Perhaps he has an unhealthy obsession with her and thinks about her all the time. People who publicly announce "I haven't been thinking about <X>" are usually doing so to hide the fact they've been doing nothing but think about <X>. In this case Peterson hasn't been thinking about her for the last 7 or 8 years, and has posted quite often to make sure everyone knows he hasn't been thinking about her. It's a bit of a "tell".

[malkie]

Given Kate Kelly hasn't been particularly prominent over the last few years, why does DCP keep bring her up for discussion? I can only think that mentioning her on his blog provides some kind of spike in hits, and so every time he needs to generate increased activity he regurgitates his same comment about "I haven't been thinking about Kate Kelly...". I can think of no other reason for it. Perhaps he has an unhealthy obsession with her and thinks about her all the time. People who publicly announce "I haven't been thinking about <X>" are usually doing so to hide the fact they've been doing nothing but think about <X>. In this case Peterson hasn't been thinking about her for the last 7 or 8 years, and has posted quite often to make sure everyone knows he hasn't been thinking about her. It's a bit of a "tell".

Perhaps someone keeps telling Dr Peterson not to think about elephants.

[Moksha]

I rather liked Dr. Peterson quoting from The Charge of the FAIR Brigade in response to the so-called "Kate Kelly":

Take up the Elder’s burden-
Have done with childish ways-
The lightly proffered laurel,
The easy, Motherhood praise.

Comes now, to search our Priesthood
Through all the lucrative years,
Cold-edged with Dear-Jesus bought wisdom,
The judgment of our peers!