Hugh Nibley/Richard Bushman/Jeff Bradshaw/ LDS Apologetics Completely Refuted with New Historical Scholarship on Enoch

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
Philo Sofee
God
Posts: 6029
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 1:18 am

Hugh Nibley/Richard Bushman/Jeff Bradshaw/ LDS Apologetics Completely Refuted with New Historical Scholarship on Enoch

Post by Philo Sofee »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZuuHylqw40c

I have shown with brand new historical evidence from Colby Townsend new information on the availability of the Book of Enoch to Joseph Smith is overwhelming. Hugh Nibley did not want to see the evidence, so he didn't look. And all LDS apologetics since have simply accepted what he said based on a paltry two sources which were personal opinions, not scholarly analysis. It annihilates LDS apologetics on the Book of Enoch. Come and see the evidence which I present in lieu of Colby Townsend.
Philo Sofee
God
Posts: 6029
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 1:18 am

Re: Hugh Nibley/Richard Bushman/Jeff Bradshaw/ LDS Apologetics Completely Refuted with New Historical Scholarship on Eno

Post by Philo Sofee »

drumdude wrote:
Wed Jan 04, 2023 5:58 am
Nibley's outdated apologetic:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u3PvM-4T7dU
A great clip historically, thank you for the link.
Post Reply