Um, if he is a nice loving alpha male (the qualities are by no means mutually exclusive), why not?
The idea that alpha = nasty, selfish and unloved does not chime with my observations at all.
Um, if he is a nice loving alpha male (the qualities are by no means mutually exclusive), why not?
Nice of you to try to help out, but I don't think a young woman who reads your posts will see you as a reliable source of advice.doubtingthomas wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 3:32 pmI don't think women should be too picky in their 20s.
To my knowledge, there has been no formal ruling on it and there is no precedent for an applying it to a user disclosing the fact or content of a warning. I don’t think DTs disclosure violates either the letter or spirit of the rule.
There's a correlation. Maybe if you combine loneliness with years of rejection on dating apps.
I am still trying to understand why you think that my views are sexist. Is it sexist to say that young women are too picky?
DT referenced a private communication he received, there was no way for those reading it to know the technical form in which it came; it's difficult to see how that doesn't violate rule 3 except apparently on a technicality, but I don't need further discussion, I accept the decision that it does not.Do not make mention of anything that allegedly transpired or is transpiring via the chat room or via private message that the source him- or herself has not overtly made public. People who communicate behind-the-scenes obviously intend their communications to remain behind-the-scenes. Any post on the board itself making reference to such things will be deleted.
Emphasis mine. I suspect this is an incorrect assessment on your part especially understanding that we are often most blind to our own biases.doubtingthomas wrote: ↑Mon Mar 06, 2023 11:36 pmMy "ugly" and "destructive" emotions aren't affecting the way I talk to women. I don't hate women. I might have some resentment, forgive me for being a human being, but I don't hate women.
Because it's a man's job to love and the woman's job to receive love. That's just the order of nature. When he's king of the mountain it's winner take all. When he is dethroned and toppled he's forgotten and falls back into obscurity. It's how we're wired by evolution. Women do not have a sex drive and they're more picky. They rarely chase men. And until someone who is good enough to them shows an interest, they'll choose being single.Um, if he is a nice loving alpha male (the qualities are by no means mutually exclusive), why not?
The idea that alpha = nasty, selfish and unloved does not chime with my observations at all.
If one makes an effort to apply the last sentence of UR 13, I don't think it's hard to understand at all.Marcus wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 3:54 pmOk thank you.
But I disagree about violating the spirit of the law. I base my interpretation on UR3, the part I bolded:DT referenced a private communication he received, there was no way for those reading it to know the technical form in which it came; it's difficult to see how that doesn't violate rule 3 except apparently on a technicality, but I don't need further discussion, I accept the decision that it does not.Do not make mention of anything that allegedly transpired or is transpiring via the chat room or via private message that the source him- or herself has not overtly made public. People who communicate behind-the-scenes obviously intend their communications to remain behind-the-scenes. Any post on the board itself making reference to such things will be deleted.
The first sentence states what the rule is. The second states the rationale for the rule. The third addresses enforcement of the rule.Do not make mention of anything that allegedly transpired or is transpiring via the chat room or via private message that the source him- or herself has not overtly made public. People who communicate behind-the-scenes obviously intend their communications to remain behind-the-scenes. Any post on the board itself making reference to such things will be deleted