“Peter Pan” is Unmasked as Mike Parker

[Res Ipsa]

One will note RI didn’t admit to being wrong or misunderstandinging what he was reading, and instead did a full play-by-play and then moved to the goalpost to some other complaint. Typical RI lawyering.

exactly.

Same questions as to Doc: what did I misunderstand? Where do you think I originally set goalposts and where do you think I moved them to?

[Res Ipsa]

ooh, at its very very worst.

Shieeeet. I gots two UR7s from RI today. But, yeah. cOnSpIrAcY bRaInS. And I didn’t link any in real life information with a poster’s username here.

- Doc

I asked that if folks had questions about the moderator action to shoot me a PM. The reason should be obvious: to avoid disclosing the information I deleted in the first place. I’m still waiting.

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

exactly.

Same questions as to Doc: what did I misunderstand? Where do you think I originally set goalposts and where do you think I moved them to?

I’m not indulging your nonsense, counselor. You know what you’re doing, because you have an ego and wordplay is your competitive domain. But, if you’re confused about your own lack of understanding on the topic I encourage you to go back and read the record.

- Doc

[Res Ipsa]

Same questions as to Doc: what did I misunderstand? Where do you think I originally set goalposts and where do you think I moved them to?

I’m not indulging your nonsense, counselor. You know what you’re doing, because you have an ego and wordplay is your competitive domain. But, if you’re confused about your own lack of understanding on the topic I encourage you to go back and read the record.

- Doc

It’s your claim. If it’s accurate, you should easily be able to back it up. If you won’t, I think it’s fair to conclude your’re just arguing to win by blowing smoke.

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

Shieeeet. I gots two UR7s from RI today. But, yeah. cOnSpIrAcY bRaInS. And I didn’t link any in real life information with a poster’s username here.

- Doc

I asked that if folks had questions about the moderator action to shoot me a PM. The reason should be obvious: to avoid disclosing the information I deleted in the first place. I’m still waiting.

Have you considered for one hot second we don’t, in fact, “have questions” about your moderator actions? Goddamn, the ego on you. You were quick on the trigger. Neither Gabriel nor myself linked any in real life information to a specific poster here. But, hey. That’s your call. I don’t really have questions about your process or itchy trigger finger with regard to that particular moderator action.

The only thing I can surmise from the whole thing is that the poster you’re protecting has posted such heinous crap on this board that it’d have in real life consequences for him if it got back to his real life. I agree. It would. I won’t state anything more, because I don’t want a third UR7 violation.

- Doc

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

I’m not indulging your nonsense, counselor. You know what you’re doing, because you have an ego and wordplay is your competitive domain. But, if you’re confused about your own lack of understanding on the topic I encourage you to go back and read the record.

- Doc

It’s your claim. If it’s accurate, you should easily be able to back it up. If you won’t, I think it’s fair to conclude your’re just arguing to win by blowing smoke.

I literally posted what I posted on this thread. There’s no need to back up an easily readable record. Go on now. You can do it!

- Doc

[Marcus]

ooh, at its very very worst.

Shieeeet. I gots two UR7s from RI today. But, yeah. cOnSpIrAcY bRaInS. And I didn’t link any in real life information with a poster’s username here.

- Doc

seriously. and here's the comment i made that got defined as 'conspiracy theorizing at its worst':

Huh. Another godlike presence we aren't allowed to notice?

[Res Ipsa]

I asked that if folks had questions about the moderator action to shoot me a PM. The reason should be obvious: to avoid disclosing the information I deleted in the first place. I’m still waiting.

Have you considered for one hot second we don’t, in fact, “have questions” about your moderator actions? Goddamn, the ego on you. You were quick on the trigger. Neither Gabriel nor myself linked any in real life information to a specific poster here. But, hey. That’s your call. I don’t really have questions about your process or itchy trigger finger with regard to that particular moderator action.

The only thing I can surmise from the whole thing is that the poster you’re protecting has posted such heinous crap on this board that it’d have in real life consequences for him if it got back to his real life. I agree. It would. I won’t state anything more, because I don’t want a third UR7 violation.

- Doc

And there’s the problem. You obviously don’t understand why I took the action I took. And you have no interest in listening to why I took the action I did. You simply decided that you know better than I do why I took the action and concocted a false narrative.

I’m more than happy to explain, but I can’t publicly without violating UR 7.

[Res Ipsa]

It’s your claim. If it’s accurate, you should easily be able to back it up. If you won’t, I think it’s fair to conclude your’re just arguing to win by blowing smoke.

I literally posted what I posted on this thread. There’s no need to back up an easily readable record. Go on now. You can do it!

- Doc

So, just blowing smoke.

[Res Ipsa]

Conspiracy theorizing at its worst.

ooh, at its very very worst.

My apologies, Marcus. I replied to the wrong post.