“Peter Pan” is Unmasked as Mike Parker

[Marcus]

And you'll notice comments are turned off. What sniveling cowards.

[drumdude]

And they just made the video private.

Not before I got a copy, though. Again, great opsec Mike. Bravo.

[Marcus]

And they just made the video private.

Not before I got a copy, though. Again, great opsec Mike. Bravo.

Glad you got that. What cowards.

[malkie]

And they just made the video private.

Not before I got a copy, though. Again, great opsec Mike. Bravo.

Glad you got that. What cowards.

Likely heroes in their own and each others' eyes, though -

[Tom]

It’s been reposted: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Hl7ym2CjVl0

[drumdude]

I’ve uploaded the part that Boylan cut out around the 1:11:00 minute mark here:

https://streamable.com/xqhfl0

I think Mike goofed by admitting that Interpreter now has its own “Metcalfe is butthead” moment with a thanks to both Mike Parker and Peter Pan in an article as a dumb inside joke.

Which is what you would expect from such a highly esteemed and meticulously scholarly journal like Interpreter.

He also linked Spencer Krauss as in on the joke.

[malkie]

I’ve uploaded the part that Boylan cut out around the 1:11:00 minute mark here:

https://streamable.com/xqhfl0

I think Mike goofed by admitting that Interpreter now has its own “Metcalfe is butthead” moment with a thanks to both Mike Parker and Peter Pan in an article as a dumb inside joke.

Which is what you would expect from such a highly esteemed and meticulously scholarly journal like Interpreter.

He also linked Spencer Krauss as in on the joke.

The real problem is that us "anti-Mormons" just have no sense of humour.

We should be guffawing along with them, and exclaiming how clever it was to insert an "Esaias and Isaiah" Joseph-Smith-style inside joke.

[Marcus]

I don't think I've ever heard anyone argue that being publicly racist is okay because your racism was done to taunt a group of people who you think are also racist.

[MormonDiscussionInc]

Mike Parker has been encouraged by me to simply come clean.

They attempted to release a response last night
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bza19t6No9A
but then pulled it.

It (I believe the same version as I have evidence of that) then showed up again:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hl7ym2CjVl0

Where for the first time, I sense they are attempting to tell the outward story mostly accurately but with motivations obscured and whatever behind the scenes conversations occurred left off.

They still seem oblivious to why creating a fake black man to create cover for unhealthy rhetoric from white men might be problematic.

Thoughts?

[malkie]

Mike Parker has been encouraged by me to simply come clean.

They attempted to release a response last night
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bza19t6No9A
but then pulled it.

It (I believe the same version as I have evidence of that) then showed up again:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hl7ym2CjVl0

Where for the first time, I sense they are attempting to tell the story mostly accurately.

Now the motivations they are claiming and what actually fueled decisions to behave a certain way are still affected by the evidence I have but I finally think the order of events are much more in line with reality versus prior claims to not "know anything". This video will demonstrably show that lies happened along the way. We were already able to show lies and deception all along the way. But they are finally sensing this needed a better explanation.

They still seem oblivious to why creating a fake black man to create cover for unhealthy rhetoric from white men might be problematic.

Thoughts?

Around 12:18-12:40 - If I misstate anything, please correct me.

- Comments are turned off.