I guess my joke did not land.MsJack wrote: ↑Mon Aug 14, 2023 4:19 pmLike, did he ever quote or refer to any ECFs in his writings?
If his ideas were similar to some patristic ideas, that in itself isn't proof that he ever picked up an English translation of Augustine or Athanasius or Origen.
While the Protestant tradition itself goes back ~500 years, Luther, Calvin et al. read the church fathers with great interest and often interacted with patristic interpreters. They did not see themselves as starting a new church, but of rescuing the extant church from what had become papal corruption. They tried to incorporate patristic interpretations and theology in their teachings.
I hadn't heard of Joseph Smith interacting with the church fathers---I was under the impression most of his theological innovations were his own, or were reactions to / re-workings of 19th century Christianity and Freemasonry.
I apologize if I've misunderstood anything you've said here, Kish. I of course share most of your reservations with how Christians interact with and dismiss Mormonism.
I am persuaded that he did encounter the ideas of ECFs from secondary sources written in English. He was also exposed to these ideas by associates who were better read and educated than he was. Like William Davis, I think Smith’s educational attainments were soft-pedaled and at times actively suppressed. Lucy Mack’s history is a good example of where this misrepresentation was happening.
I am not saying that I have examples of Smith quoting ECFs, and I cannot say for certain that he consulted anything other than secondary sources. What was present in the available secondary sources is pretty surprising.