Misogyny In The Film "Witnesses"
- Everybody Wang Chung
- God
- Posts: 3820
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:52 am
Misogyny In The Film "Witnesses"
Reading the reviews for DCP's magnum opus I noticed there were a couple of reviews that mentioned there were no positive female characters in the film. I've also wondered why the women characters are either portrayed as scared, helpless, evil, conniving or silly and brainless.
From the first scene that shows David Whitmer's wife helplessly cowering in fear, to portraying Lucy Harris as an evil mastermind and portraying all of Lucy's friends as gossipy, shrill and silly, DCP's film drips with misogyny. I don't know if there are any women in the entire film with any redeeming qualities. Even Emma Smith is portrayed as a one-dimensional character written to only serve Joseph's needs as a prop.
Why did DCP portray the women as silly and/or villains in his film? Is that really how DCP views women? Much has been written about DCP's misogyny and maybe the misogyny in Witnesses is merely a reflection of DCP's deeply held biases?
Regardless, I hope that 'Six Days In August' doesn't portray Emma as a one-dimensional villain who tried to wrest control of the Church from Brigham Young to her sons, but I'm not holding my breath. If DCP is actually able to get funding to make "Six Days In August' it will probably also be filled with misogyny.
You can do better DCP. You can be better. It's not too late.
From the first scene that shows David Whitmer's wife helplessly cowering in fear, to portraying Lucy Harris as an evil mastermind and portraying all of Lucy's friends as gossipy, shrill and silly, DCP's film drips with misogyny. I don't know if there are any women in the entire film with any redeeming qualities. Even Emma Smith is portrayed as a one-dimensional character written to only serve Joseph's needs as a prop.
Why did DCP portray the women as silly and/or villains in his film? Is that really how DCP views women? Much has been written about DCP's misogyny and maybe the misogyny in Witnesses is merely a reflection of DCP's deeply held biases?
Regardless, I hope that 'Six Days In August' doesn't portray Emma as a one-dimensional villain who tried to wrest control of the Church from Brigham Young to her sons, but I'm not holding my breath. If DCP is actually able to get funding to make "Six Days In August' it will probably also be filled with misogyny.
You can do better DCP. You can be better. It's not too late.
"I'm on paid sabbatical from BYU in exchange for my promise to use this time to finish two books."
Daniel C. Peterson, 2014
Daniel C. Peterson, 2014
- Gadianton
- God
- Posts: 6729
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 11:56 pm
- Location: Elsewhere
Re: Misogyny In The Film Witnesses
I don't think there's really much choice. Either blindly support Joseph Smith or be a bad person.
By the way, doesn't "Six days in August" sound like the title of one of those NC-17 sex movies? If that's what this is, it might be an upswing in accuracy.
Probably wouldn't be a bad idea in the future to leak potential film titles and get some reactions.
By the way, doesn't "Six days in August" sound like the title of one of those NC-17 sex movies? If that's what this is, it might be an upswing in accuracy.
Probably wouldn't be a bad idea in the future to leak potential film titles and get some reactions.
"if you can't admire Joe Biden as a person then it's probably, you got a problem." -- Lindsey Graham
- Moksha
- God
- Posts: 8266
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:13 am
- Location: Koloburbia
Re: Misogyny In The Film Witnesses
RFM had some good thoughts regarding how Brigham Young was able to shapeshift into a replica of Joseph Smith and back within the course of a speech. Can't remember if it involved Brigham being an extraterrestrial, but that is probably covered under the advanced "meat of the gospels" course at BYU.
Is relegating women to background parts a form of misogyny?
Is relegating women to background parts a form of misogyny?
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
- Everybody Wang Chung
- God
- Posts: 3820
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:52 am
Re: Misogyny In The Film Witnesses
Yes, "Six days in August" does sound kind of porny. I heard DCP's initial choice was rejected, "Tapir Boookakke: A Haunting in Delmarva."Gadianton wrote: ↑Sun Aug 27, 2023 4:02 amI don't think there's really much choice. Either blindly support Joseph Smith or be a bad person.
By the way, doesn't "Six days in August" sound like the title of one of those NC-17 sex movies? If that's what this is, it might be an upswing in accuracy.
Probably wouldn't be a bad idea in the future to leak potential film titles and get some reactions.
"I'm on paid sabbatical from BYU in exchange for my promise to use this time to finish two books."
Daniel C. Peterson, 2014
Daniel C. Peterson, 2014
- Kishkumen
- God
- Posts: 10435
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:37 pm
- Location: Cassius University
- Contact:
Re: Misogyny In The Film Witnesses
I have warned my father-in-law that I will be pressing him to go see “Six Days In August” with me. He chuckled, and he said he would try not to fall asleep during this one as he did during Witnesses.
There definitely should be a film that focuses mostly on women heroes of the Restoration.
There definitely should be a film that focuses mostly on women heroes of the Restoration.
"He disturbs the laws of his country, he forces himself upon women, and he puts men to death without trial.” ~Otanes on the monarch, Herodotus Histories 3.80.
-
drumdude
- God
- Posts: 8044
- Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:29 am
- Kishkumen
- God
- Posts: 10435
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:37 pm
- Location: Cassius University
- Contact:
Re: Misogyny In The Film Witnesses
That one is hilarious. Of course, Don Bradley demolished it as a historical narrative.drumdude wrote: ↑Sun Aug 27, 2023 1:58 pmSouth Park did a pretty good job
https://youtu.be/Hm3mDatFpNE
Lucy Harris Smart!
"He disturbs the laws of his country, he forces himself upon women, and he puts men to death without trial.” ~Otanes on the monarch, Herodotus Histories 3.80.
- Physics Guy
- God
- Posts: 2308
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 7:40 am
- Location: on the battlefield of life
Re: Misogyny In The Film Witnesses
Beyond just avoiding outright misogyny, a further standard for artistic representation of women is the Bechdel test. It’s still a ludicrously low bar, when you state it: do any two named female characters ever discuss anything other than a man? The test is passed if such a conversation, even a very brief one, occurs anywhere in the entire work, even once.
It is disturbing how many books and films fail to pass this minimal test. Stories that fail the Bechdel test are usually not notoriously weird, either, the way any story would be that never even once had two men discuss anything besides a woman.
It is disturbing how many books and films fail to pass this minimal test. Stories that fail the Bechdel test are usually not notoriously weird, either, the way any story would be that never even once had two men discuss anything besides a woman.
I was a teenager before it was cool.
-
drumdude
- God
- Posts: 8044
- Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:29 am
Re: Misogyny In The Film Witnesses
Kishkumen wrote: ↑Sun Aug 27, 2023 2:20 pmThat one is hilarious. Of course, Don Bradley demolished it as a historical narrative.drumdude wrote: ↑Sun Aug 27, 2023 1:58 pmSouth Park did a pretty good job
https://youtu.be/Hm3mDatFpNE
Lucy Harris Smart!
Interesting. I haven’t read his new book but I did find this:
https://youtu.be/1smM8sRMCRU
-
drumdude
- God
- Posts: 8044
- Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:29 am
Re: Misogyny In The Film Witnesses
One of many examples of the Directors not so subtle misogyny:
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... -name.html
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... -name.html