Did you know of the Harris-Trump Debate?

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

We still really don't know what Kamala Harris actually believes or intends to do.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/kamala-har ... ions-2024/

[Billy Shears]

I know ABC News failed to fact check her claim that she wouldn't confiscate guns. Who is lying Kamala or Raphael Warnock?

https://x.com/thevivafrei/status/1833695283407987018

That’s a trick question; you are the person who is lying. The video you linked to does not show Warnock claiming Harris will confiscate guns.

[Billy Shears]

An 11-second summary of Harris’s position on prison reform, healthcare financing, immigration policy, and transgender issues:

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8JtBc4g/

[Gadianton]

I have no interest in debates and didn't watch this one, but watched the obligatory summaries with some clips. There is no question that Trump looked weak and pathetic and totally non-powerful. Like he was a kid that knows he did bad. It's funny how much confidence he has when surrounded by sycophants, it wasn't the same guy who jumped up with a raised fist.

As for the suggestion that a cabinet member revealed guns will be confiscated -- I don't think anyone associated with that suggestion believes it.

[drumdude]

Sorry if I do not have any links to prove this debate occurred for Shades.

[Doctor Steuss]

The thing that stood out to me was just how easily she manipulated and baited Trump. There have been multiple security advisors, and administration officials who worked with Trump who have talked about how easily he is manipulated (particularly by foreign assets and heads of state). Reading about it, verses watching it happen in real time by someone who isn’t even adept at it was insane.

It was a sobering reminder that people who vote for Trump are actually just voting for whoever spoke to him last right before he made a decision. Sometimes that person will be a literal socialist dictator… so have fun with that.

[Marcus]

The thing that stood out to me was just how easily she manipulated and baited Trump. There have been multiple security advisors, and administration officials who worked with Trump who have talked about how easily he is manipulated (particularly by foreign assets and heads of state). Reading about it, verses watching it happen in real time by someone who isn’t even adept at it was insane.

It was a sobering reminder that people who vote for Trump are actually just voting for whoever spoke to him last right before he made a decision. Sometimes that person will be a literal socialist dictator… so have fun with that.

Excellent point. Best comment I've read so far summing up the debate was that it was like 'feeding a gremlin after midnight.' Totally predictable, but at least this gremlin was just rendered ineffective.

And I can't believe Trump brought up immigrants eating pet dogs and cats, and abortion occurring after birth. Seriously????? If his daddy hadn't gifted him so much money, he'd be the 4chan creep posting conspiracies from his mom's basement.

[ajax18]

The thing that stood out to me was just how easily she manipulated and baited Trump. There have been multiple security advisors, and administration officials who worked with Trump who have talked about how easily he is manipulated (particularly by foreign assets and heads of state). Reading about it, verses watching it happen in real time by someone who isn’t even adept at it was insane.

It was a sobering reminder that people who vote for Trump are actually just voting for whoever spoke to him last right before he made a decision. Sometimes that person will be a literal socialist dictator… so have fun with that.

Excellent point. Best comment I've read so far summing up the debate was that it was like 'feeding a gremlin after midnight.' Totally predictable, but at least this gremlin was just rendered ineffective.

And I can't believe Trump brought up immigrants eating pet dogs and cats, and abortion occurring after birth. Seriously????? If his daddy hadn't gifted him so much money, he'd be the 4chan creep posting conspiracies from his mom's basement.

If Kamala doesn't believe late term abortions or after birth abortion should be illegal she could have said she would put these limits on abortion when she was asked specifically by her own media if she was in favor of any restrictions on abortion. Instead she refused to answer the question. What do expect voters to conclude when a politician refuses to answer the question?

The left wing fact checkers actually lied on after birth abortion. The born alive infant protection act that was meant to protect babies born alive during botched abortions was sent to Tim Walz's desk as Gov. of Minnesota. Walz vetoed the legislation. Democrats do want there to be no criminal liability for letting a baby born alive during a botched abortion die. 8 babies have actually been born alive during botched abortions in Minnesota since this and were left to die on the table by the doctors.

Ralph Northam Gov. of VA, literally said that if a baby is accidentally born alive during an abortion, you put it off to the side and make it comfortable until you decide what to do with it. Lindsey Davis and David Muir falsely fact checked this true statement. This is what I mean by rigging an election with lies. If you're fine with killing babies with impunity, then at least be honest to the voters about what your stance is. But they lie. How do you have a functional democracy or free and fair elections when the media lies to the voters like this?

Yes it is true that you can do an abortion in the 7th, 8th, 9th month. Where were the fact checkers? Trump did try to fact check Kamala on this and follow up if she agreed that 7th, 8th, and 9th month abortions should be legal. Again she refused to answer. Of course she's for that. She had two and three times to admit that she wasn't.

The supreme court decision leaves it up to the states to decide on the abortion question. Kamala Harris's accusation that Trump would sign an abortion ban was another lie and it also went unfact checked and unchallenged by the Democrat praetorian guard, i.e. the mainstream media.

[Moksha]

What is this Ajaxian nonsense about abortions after birth? Is he still ingesting bleach?

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

What is this Ajaxian nonsense about abortions after birth? Is he still ingesting bleach?

Critics seized on the lack of explicit mention of a terminal condition to distort Gov. Northam’s following remark:

"If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen. The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother."

Northam was speaking about situations involving infants with severe deformities or non-viable conditions, where families and doctors would make decisions about palliative care.

But, it’s important for you to remember that Ajax is utterly retarded, and has exactly zero interest in reading anything that isn’t a news ticker on Fox News, or a tweet on False Social. For example, he keeps saying he doesn’t know any of Harris’ positions even though I provided him two links. The reason? Well, he’d have to read for understanding and he can’t do that because he’s a refrigerator magnet.

- Doc