Gee agrees with me, if I remember correctly, that the church doesn't rise or fall on the Book of Abraham anyway.
This phraseology is Narcissism 101. A normal person would say something like "I agree with Professor Gee what Professor Gee says about the Book of Abraham...". But not a narcissist. The narcissist has to present as the superior person in the equation.
In no way is that what I'm stating. I am saying that he and I happen to agree. I did my own comparitive analysis (obviously at a layperson's level) in regards to the Book of Mormon vs. Book of Abraham.
The primary thing to remember is that one is the keystone of our religion and the other is not.
Can we lay off the amateur psychology? I could just as well apply the term narcissist to you without any evidence. That wouldn't make it true.
You failed to answer my questions that would give us a better idea of who you are. That says something. It's as if you're hiding something.
Mentalgymnast regularly asks people to answer his "questions" about their lives. My reasons for not responding remain the same since he started that particular trolling technique many years ago:
mentalgymnast wrote:by the way, I asked you a few questions recently. They remain unanswered.
Of course they do. You have made far too many creepy, ugly innuendos in the last year about what might happen were you to meet up with me in real life, about my in real life work, and about me as a women. I do not take seriously any questions you might ask of me.
Last edited by Marcus on Tue Mar 18, 2025 11:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
You have made far too many creepy, ugly innuendos in the last year about what might happen were you to meet up with me in real life...
Such as?
By the way, it is IHAQ that I am concerned with presently in regards to revealing a bit more about himself. In your case I am simply presenting the case that you are the troll...going about doing what a troll does.
Now THAT'S creepy. You seemingly sit at your keyboard waiting for me to show up. Fortunately, last week when I laid out the evidence that YOU were the troll...you disappeared temporarily.
You have made far too many creepy, ugly innuendos in the last year about what might happen were you to meet up with me in real life...
Such as?
By the way, it is IHAQ that I am concerned with presently in regards to revealing a bit more about himself. In your case I am simply presenting the case that you are the troll...going about doing what a troll does.
Now THAT'S creepy. You seemingly sit at your keyboard waiting for me to show up. Fortunately, last week when I laid out the evidence that YOU were the troll...you disappeared temporarily.
I found that interesting.
But here you are again.
Again, this thread proves my point(s).
Well done!
Regards,
MG
You are a bomb thrower. Always have been, always will be. Substance-free nonsense is your only export.
Intentional disruption: The person is deliberately attempting to disrupt the other poster's online activities, which is a key aspect of trolling.
Persistent negativity: Consistently trying to find fault and being disagreeable matches the troll behavior of having only negative things to say about another poster's contributions.
Targeted harassment: Following a specific user around the discussion board to engage in this behavior can be seen as a form of online harassment, which is often associated with trolling.
Provocation of emotional responses: The constant disagreement and fault-finding are likely intended to provoke frustration or other negative emotional responses from the target, which is a common goal of trolls.
Derailing discussions: This behavior can derail productive conversations and shift focus away from the original topics, which is another tactic employed by trolls.
