You guys are still at it! (why am I not surprised?)

[Shulem]

If you feel the compulsion to do so, that's your prerogative.

Your twisted arguments are destroyed and you face the full wrath of Shulem.

[Marcus]

Wow. You are one sick puppy.


Good. "Others" have determined your posts are wildly inappropriate. Good grief. At the very least, you should be grateful that people are aware that your sickness is yours alone and doesn't reflect what the average person in your religion thinks. Or maybe it does, who knows. Bottom line, you are a very sick individual. May you find some peace because clearly, you are a tortured soul. The hatred you express for people here unbelievable. What happened to you to create such hate? Dear god, your path must be horrendous. May you find peace.

We view the world differently. That doesn't make one of us "sick" and the other one "well". It makes us different.

I have found peace, thank you.

Regards,
MG

I said your post demonstrated you are a sick person. And it does. That post is a sickening display of your hatred for people here.

[Trolling includes the behavior of those] who attach themselves to a given tribe of people with whom they don’t actually want to identify with but whom they do want the personal privilege of constantly critiquing with their posts.

https://www.christopherbenek.com/2015/0 ... -trolling/

[MG 2.0]

[You have a]...hatred for people here.

No I don't. That is your perception and the story that you would like to take hold.

Someone earlier had asked why I started this thread. I think it has become rather self evident.

Rehashing extraordinaire. This thread acts as a clarification of all that has come before.

It may be winding down at this point. It usually does when the ad hominem kicks in big time.

But that's been going on for a number of pages now. I would expect that it would reach a natural end. But it hasn't.

Why that is, I don't know. Fixation that is emotionally driven? Not sure.

But it is interesting, nonetheless.

Regards,
MG

[MG 2.0]

If you feel the compulsion to do so, that's your prerogative.

Your twisted arguments are destroyed and you face the full wrath of Shulem.

You're a character, Shulem. I say that in the same way I'd say it to a grandson that does wacky things at times.

Regards,
MG

[Shulem]

Your twisted arguments are destroyed and you face the full wrath of Shulem.

You're a character, Shulem. I say that in the same way I'd say it to a grandson that does wacky things at times.

Regards,
MG

So what character would you like to assign your grandson to in Facsimile No. 3?

Are you black, MG? If you be black, you get no priesthood and neither do your grandson. Curse of Cain be upon you.

Repeat 3 times:

Curse of Cain be upon me.
Curse of Cain be upon me.
Curse of Cain be upon me.

[malkie]

MG posed the following questions of a personal nature to I Have Questions, and bumped them twice which means he was asked three times to hand over personal information that is none of MG's business!

Projection? Absent the church callings of course. What do you call it when you come to this board to put the church down? Is that healthy?

We know very little about you, IHAQ. What kind of person are you? Are you a loner? What do you do with your time when you're not on the computer? What do you do to serve others? Are you happily married? Do your children love and respect you? Do you have grandchildren that you spend time with often? Are you involved in community service? Do you take care of yourself physically and exercise regularly? Can you be trusted around children? If yes, how do we know that to be true? What is your belief system? How does it work for you? Would you recommend it to others? Why?

Who are you? What makes YOU tick?

Regards,
MG

I asked MG one time if he's bisexual and he neglected to answer.

Needless to say, I won't ask MG again if he's bisexual. That's his business and best to leave it at that. You'd think he'd grant IHAQ the same consideration without bumping the post trying to dig for personal information that most rational people are not going to disclose in a hostile environment.

MG wants that personal information so he can use it to attack his foe.

Do I recall correctly that MG was unable to decide how to respond to a board member (Marcus) without knowing if they were male, or female, or other?

[Shulem]

Do I recall correctly that MG was unable to decide how to respond to a board member (Marcus) without knowing if they were male, or female, or other?

Yeah, I remember that little tiff. But I recall that MG was tactful about it.

What irks me, however, is how the Church continues to publish false statements about Egyptian gods in Facsimile No. 3 and MG refuses to admit that his Church has made a terrible mistake in publishing these things in Mormon canon. It is NOT true!

Facsimile No. 3 must go!
Facsimile No. 3 must go!
Facsimile No. 3 must go!

[Marcus]

Do I recall correctly that MG was unable to decide how to respond to a board member (Marcus) without knowing if they were male, or female, or other?

Yeah, I remember that little tiff. But I recall that MG was tactful about it...

Well....i wouldn't exactly call his response tactful. Others were, but mentalgymnast's contribution was more along the lines of sexist trolling with a sickening LDS twist:

... freeranger referred to you as “buddy”. Are you a buddy? Even if you’re a female who goes by Marcus?

...What is it you have to offer?

Lemmie=female. Marcus=male. Are you one, or are you the other? And does this have any relevance to your conversation to freeranger and his views in regards to what you say?

Freeranger should know the contextual framework/position from which you are speaking. He seems to be supportive of the LDS framework in which a man is encouraged to be a man. A leader. An example of goodness and righteousness.

Again, what is it that you are offering to compete with this?...

[MG 2.0]

Again, what is it that you are offering to compete with this?

Yes, I've asked you many times now what you have that you would encourage others to latch onto as their 'north star' to give them meaning and purpose in life besides making it up as you go along...and then you die. Lights out.

I don't think you've given a satisfactory answer as of yet.

Maybe it will come...

Regards,
MG

[Marcus]

Again, what is it that you are offering to compete with this?

Yes, I've asked you many times now what you have that you would encourage others to latch onto as their 'north star' to give them meaning and purpose in life besides making it up as you go along...and then you die. Lights out.

I don't think you've given a satisfactory answer as of yet.

Maybe it will come...

Regards,
MG

Lol. Did you not read the sexist context in which you asked that? Wow. As a reminder, you said

...Freeranger should know the contextual framework/position from which you are speaking. He seems to be supportive of the LDS framework in which a man is encouraged to be a man. A leader. An example of goodness and righteousness.

Again, what is it that you are offering to compete with this?...

Lol. You really make yourself look bad when you make mistakes like this.

And for another flashback to mentalgymnast's sexism:

Really? You mean that you treat women differently than men in online discussions? What is your rational[e] for that?

Actually, I try very hard not to. But, you know, it is helpful to know if you are speaking to a male or female.

...And yes, it matters in a particular conversation such as this. Men…masculinity. Females…femininity. LDS teachings in regards to what makes a good man.

Or maybe a non-binary person should be looked to as THE authoritative voice? Not saying that’s what you are (non-binary), but some folks might like to know.

...But in my opinion it’s not a bad thing to know where someone is coming from as they are speaking to patriarchy, etc...