The artificial intelligence MEGATHREAD

[MG 2.0]

Not that you asked me, so you don't need to respond, but in my opinion mg uses 'extreme' in an entirely different way than he is implying here. There is a post of his in this thread where he quoted a minor side comment I made about an issue related to the main topic, to which he then responded with an almost 2,500 word post that included multiple A.I. responses, each more off topic than the previous.

There is no way that was a post made with the intent to participate, it was clearly made with the intent to disrupt. His protestations that his use of A.I. adds to conversations and that his "freedom of information is limited to the extreme" are hollow and insincere.

Hi Marcus,
Are you referring to page 7 of this thread, fourth post down from the top? If so, I think the A.I. definitely added important information to the conversation. And I had my commentary to make also. If you're referring to another post on a different page would you please refer to it rather than saying, "a post" and "minor side comment"?

Thanks,
MG

*bump

[Xenophon]

FYI if you'd ever like to link directly to a post, as opposed to providing page/post counts, you can click on the little box just below the post's title to get a direct link to the post:



The result - viewtopic.php?p=2895343#p2895343

[MG 2.0]

FYI if you'd ever like to link directly to a post, as opposed to providing page/post counts, you can click on the little box just below the post's title to get a direct link to the post:



The result - viewtopic.php?p=2895343#p2895343

Ah! Thanks.

Regards,
MG