I note that this report has been closed by Dr. Shades without any consequence for MG 2.0 being applied. So the above mustn’t amount to a link and run - in which case I’d like an explanation as to why it doesn’t (as I didn’t get an explanation when the report was closed).I Have Questions wrote: ↑Sat Jun 28, 2025 5:25 pmI’ve reported this link and run. Again. Yet again.MG 2.0 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 28, 2025 3:06 pmHere is a good place to start if you're serious and not simply doing a quick 'gotcha' response.
https://www.amazon.com/Language-God-Sci ... 1416542744
I have this book and finished reading it about a month ago. Written by a man who was the head of the Human Genome Project, was an avowed atheist, and came to Christ and belief in the Christian narrative.
And no, I will not respond to your next question having to do with, "Well, give us the top five reasons Collins gives for his belief in God and in Jesus Christ and the Christian story."
Read the book.
Regards,
MG
For reference, the board rule states “Do not EVER "link-and-run." If you post a link to something, always explain what's at the other end of the link, why it's important, and what you hope other readers / viewers learn from it. RULE OF THUMB: If it's not worth your time to describe it, then it's not worth our time to click on it.”
MG posted a link, but did not explain what was at the other end. Nor why it is important, nor what he hoped other readers/viewers would learn from it. But I'll be interested in why Dr. Shades sees it differently.