Trump Liberates DC Residents and White Progressives Hate Him For It!

[Hound of Heaven]

Today, I'm in Washington DC to visit the temple with a relative, and I woke up to find that another one of the three stooges has posted in the thread, that being Bishop Schmo, the ultimate stooge, avoided addressing the main topic of the thread and instead chose to focus on issues of racism.

Let's take a moment to reiterate the reasons behind our republican president, republican house and senate, a majority republican Supreme Court, and the fact that Trump secured victories in all 7 swing states for 2024. The reason for the significant victory by the Republicans in 2024 is that American citizens are frustrated with arrogant, entitled progressive Marxists dictating that progressivism is the only valid and rational way forward. It's quite straightforward: progressivism does not permit the existence of any other ideology, as it views all alternative belief systems as evil and racist.

Progressivism parallels Mormonism in that both groups instruct their members that the collective ideology represents the sole path that is true and just, while all alternative perspectives are deemed entirely wrong. One only needs to examine the posting history on this discussion board from the Three Stooges to realize that they are, in fact, under the influence of a progressive cult!

It seems that few recognize how Trump's decision to federalize the police force in DC is advantageous for the residents, particularly for the black community in the area. Some individuals here seem to think that black people can only gain from policy changes when Democrats are in power. They believe that during Republican leadership, black people should resist change and endure hardships until Democrats return to power, allowing them to take credit for improving their lives.

Progressives like the three stooges who post here view black people as owing a debt to the Democrat party due to the "assistance" the party has provided to the black community since the 1960s. When a Black American departs from the Democratic Party to join the Republican Party, progressives on this board often perceive that individual as a sellout, a coon, or an Uncle Tom. Proving they care not about the individual, they only care about the cult ideology.

Trump's actions in DC are set to bolster black support for the Republican Party, and progressives recognize this reality, fearing that he may replicate this success in other progressive strongholds such as New York or Chicago.

[canpakes]

Today, I'm in Washington DC to visit the temple with a relative, …

Well, I guess that’s two cults that you’re a member of.

[Hound of Heaven]

As I mentioned in the opening post of this thread, I will be sharing numerous videos and links to articles that demonstrate how ordinary, non-progressive Marxist individuals feel more positive and significantly safer since Trump federalized Washington DC.

I decided to hold off on sharing links for a few days to allow the three stooges on the discuss Mormonism board to demonstrate how their entrenched attitudes reflect a persistent inability to move beyond their biases, as they constantly exhibit that Marxist progressives embody the most profound racism in existence.

In this video, numerous Black residents of DC share their perspectives on the increased presence of officers in the city due to Trump's actions. They express a sense of enhanced safety and gratitude for the efforts being made to restore the city to a time when it felt secure. The visible changes in the city are fostering a sense of safety among the residents, which poses a significant challenge for the progressive Marxist agenda in the approaching 2026 election.

There is no doubt that Trump is working to improve DC and enhance the safety of its residents. He recognizes that once the community feels and experiences this increased safety, the black residents of DC will acknowledge his contributions. In turn, this could lead to significant support for the Republican party from black voters nationwide.

As we watch the video, it's important to remember that improving safety in DC could have been addressed by either Biden or Kamala. Ensuring the safety of DC transcends political affiliations; it is not a matter of right or left. What is occurring in DC is Trump capitalizing on the Democrats' inability to address a significant portion of their voting base.

As you view this video, consider that the ithree stooges on this board—Moe, also referred to as Canpakes the moderator, DrCamnPP, Bishop Schmo, and honorary member Molok—are all white men who appreciate the security of predominantly white neighborhoods, while simultaneously believing that Trump is a racist for trying to extend that same safety to the Black residents of DC. Individuals resembling the three stooges of this discussion board embody the true racist mindset, believing that black people in high-crime neighborhoods do not deserve the same safety that is afforded to those in predominantly white neighborhoods. They are Marxist progressives, which implies they view black people not as individuals, but rather as a voting bloc that must consistently remain loyal to the Democrat party.

Keep in mind, Joe Biden stated that black individuals aren't truly black if they choose to vote for Trump! Biden, similar to the perspective of Marxist progressives, perceives black individuals as part of a collective identity rather than recognizing them as unique individuals.

https://youtu.be/Tm9bQA4pUmg?si=wjfD54IJkkA7NzD6

[Hound of Heaven]

In 2023, during the Biden administration, a black DC council member advocated for military intervention in Washington, D.C. due to the alarming levels of crime, as illustrated in this video. https://youtu.be/-l3rfrUlMyU?si=1c-oLZHhdQKxijkM

Did Biden or Kamala taken any actions to assist the residents of DC?

As white progressives stroll through their mostly white neighborhoods this evening after work, they seem to believe that black residents of DC ought to wait for a Democrat to be in office before their streets are addressed. Progressives aim to instill fear in black DC residents for the next three years and four months, anticipating that a Democrat will be elected, allowing the Democrat president to deploy federal agents to address crime in DC. Progressive Marxism principles do not permit a Trump victory under any circumstances. Everyone will endure hardship until the Democrats regain control.

Progressives would rather see black people suffer than let Trump appear to have successfully reduced crime in the streets of DC. For the Marxist progressives, the loss of a few black babies in DC is an acceptable cost as long as Trump does not gain recognition for freeing the residents of DC.

[Gadianton]

visit the temple with a relative

Your relative sounds like kind of a loser. True?

and I woke

No doubt about that.

[Moksha]

Trump liberated the Sudetenland, and Europe got upset.

[Hound of Heaven]

It has been 12 days since a murder occurred in DC, an event that is quite uncommon in the city. Typically, a murder occurs every 1.75 days.

As I sit here in my chair observing the white individuals in my neighborhood taking their daily walks without concern for their safety, I feel compelled to remind those engaged in discussions about Mormonism that all individuals, including black people residing in high crime areas often located in Democrat-run cities, deserve the same right to walk their streets in peace as anyone else.

If it requires Donald Trump to deploy troops to the city to curb crime until the local police force is strengthened enough to manage the streets, then that is what must be done.

Consider the perspective of a Marxist progressive participating in this discussion board, who is white and privileged, navigating their surroundings without fear, yet simultaneously believing that black residents of DC should accept the crime present in their communities. What level of animosity and bitterness must a group like progressivism possess to reach a conclusion where they prefer black DC residents to live in fear rather than allow Trump to address crime on the streets?

Progressive animosity reinforces my argument that progressive cult members perceive black individuals as a group that is only valued every four years when it's time to cast votes for the Democrats. Progressives fail to see black people as individuals; if they did, they would back Trump's initiatives to eliminate crime in DC. However, it is evident that by the year 2025, progressivism has taken on a radical stance, with some progressives seemingly preferring to see black DC residents harmed rather than permit any form of victory for Trump. In a certain light, I genuinely believe that progressivism has taken on a radical form, where its proponents seem to view it as a patriotic obligation for individuals to oppose Trump and conservatives, even if it entails facing fear or risking their lives, as long as Trump does not prevail or his policies do not succeed. Their animosity towards Trump has become such an integral part of their identity that they would prefer their fellow Democrats endure violence and crime rather than witness Trump's success.

If you doubt my point, revisit the first page of this thread and begin reading. Not a single one of the Marxist progressives offers a positive perspective on the situation in DC, despite the significant decrease in crime! They show no concern for black individuals. They are solely focused on ensuring that Trump is not viewed in a positive light!

[Gadianton]

I wonder if Hound has ever been to the city. There's plenty of Rural land in New Jersey and I'll admit, some of that countryside is downright serene, I might never venture into the city either. However, not having been inside an actual city is a problem if a person believes the military can control a city let alone clean it up.

We had a matter to attend to in LA recently, during the height of the "occupation", and not a troop was to be found. They're all concentrated in one tiny area with some municipal or federal building, but then later we did run into them. They surrounded an entire block that contained some building that I'm guessing has something to do with the military. A bunch of guys in fatigues with machine guns and a few jeeps. They seemed bored -- joking around with visitors; one guy was showing off his gun to a couple. We looked for a place to park and go see what the building was about and say hello to the troops but it's LA, good luck, wasn't worth finding a parking garage for. There certainly is damage in terms of harassment in certain scenarios that I'm sure we'll wind up seeing, there is benefit to Hound here, but not on the terms as he has stated them. "ignorance is strength!" "slavery is freedom!"; sure, to the extent troops beat down residents Hound suspects aren't conservatives it's a win. But it's not going to help him financially or in any other material way.

Cities are vast. The US military isn't going to liberate a small city let a lone a big one.

[canpakes]

It has been 12 days since a murder occurred in DC, …

Awesome! Now that you’ve gone all in on your belief that black people require being the custody of a pedophile-protecting convicted fraudster cosplaying as a creamsicle to keep them from murdering each other, will you be up for increasing the funding for DC to allow it to maintain the same level of personnel on the streets?

Republicans recently throttled budget funding for the District, so if you want to keep a zero murder rate while attributing it to Trump, both you and Trump will need to step up.

https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watc ... eover/amp/

[Hound of Heaven]

I wonder if Hound has ever been to the city. There's plenty of Rural land in New Jersey and I'll admit, some of that countryside is downright serene, I might never venture into the city either. However, not having been inside an actual city is a problem if a person believes the military can control a city let alone clean it up.

We had a matter to attend to in LA recently, during the height of the "occupation", and not a troop was to be found. They're all concentrated in one tiny area with some municipal or federal building, but then later we did run into them. They surrounded an entire block that contained some building that I'm guessing has something to do with the military. A bunch of guys in fatigues with machine guns and a few jeeps. They seemed bored -- joking around with visitors; one guy was showing off his gun to a couple. We looked for a place to park and go see what the building was about and say hello to the troops but it's LA, good luck, wasn't worth finding a parking garage for. There certainly is damage in terms of harassment in certain scenarios that I'm sure we'll wind up seeing, there is benefit to Hound here, but not on the terms as he has stated them. "ignorance is strength!" "slavery is freedom!"; sure, to the extent troops beat down residents Hound suspects aren't conservatives it's a win. But it's not going to help him financially or in any other material way.

Cities are vast. The US military isn't going to liberate a small city let a lone a big one.

Gadianton, Can we have a conversation just between the two of us, without you feeling the need to share something that might be more suited for the progressives on the board rather than our discussion? If that is the case, I would appreciate it. Can we proceed?

Here’s my question, considering you don’t think Trump can use the military to liberate a city. Imagine that in the next 6 months, troops remain deployed in DC and the crime rate sees a significant decline, with only 5 murders per month, and reductions in rapes, carjackings, and thefts. If the residents of DC express satisfaction with the safer environment, would you attribute this success to Trump and our military personnel?

Secondly, what if, let's say in two years, the military remains in DC and the DC police force is somewhat fully staffed, at least to the extent that the troops and federal agents can begin to leave, and crime continues to be significantly reduced? Would you view that as a victory for DC residents?