Jacob Hansen: Yesser No?

[sock puppet]

No. It doesn’t. The thread isn’t about me. I guess now though people can see you desperately evading responding to the substantive and qualitative points I raised in answer to your questions.

TTOC

Friends, when MG 2.0 uses "TTOC" it signifies a retreat or complete white-flag surrender by him and the LDS apologists on the point to which the TTOC is thrown up by MG 2.0.

[MG 2.0]

TTOC

Friends, when MG 2.0 uses "TTOC" it signifies a retreat or complete white-flag surrender by him and the LDS apologists on the point to which the TTOC is thrown up by MG 2.0.

No it doesn't. Go back a ways in time (you will have to find the thread) and you can find out what it actually means.

Regards,
MG

[sock puppet]

Friends, when MG 2.0 uses "TTOC" it signifies a retreat or complete white-flag surrender by him and the LDS apologists on the point to which the TTOC is thrown up by MG 2.0.

No it doesn't. Go back a ways in time (you will have to find the thread) and you can find out what it actually means.

Regards,
MG

It means you've capitulated.

[I Have Questions]

Friends, when MG 2.0 uses "TTOC" it signifies a retreat or complete white-flag surrender by him and the LDS apologists on the point to which the TTOC is thrown up by MG 2.0.

No it doesn't. Go back a ways in time (you will have to find the thread) and you can find out what it actually means.

Regards,
MG

You said it would signify the end to your participation in an interaction with a poster or a thread. It’s been neither. In fact, at one point you were throwing it in to a conversation between two other posters, neither of whom were interacting with you! I suggest YOU go back and reacquaint yourself with what YOU said it actually means because you clearly don’t know.

[MG 2.0]

No it doesn't. Go back a ways in time (you will have to find the thread) and you can find out what it actually means.

Regards,
MG

It means you've capitulated.

No. That is NOT what I said.

Regards,
MG

[MG 2.0]

No it doesn't. Go back a ways in time (you will have to find the thread) and you can find out what it actually means.

Regards,
MG

You said it would signify the end to your participation in an interaction with a poster or a thread. It’s been neither. In fact, at one point you were throwing it in to a conversation between two other posters, neither of whom were interacting with you! I suggest YOU go back and reacquaint yourself with what YOU said it actually means because you clearly don’t know.

I do know what I mean and/or what my purpose is when I use TTOC. It is I who am the judge, not anyone else. I do think that this thread is quickly moving towards wasting the time of other board members. Engage in the substance of the thread or let it go would be my suggestion.

IHQ threw it off towards the end of the last page. Pseudo Paul has made some interesting commentary. I would much rather see people engage him. Now THAT would be interesting.

Regards,
MG

[I Have Questions]

You said it would signify the end to your participation in an interaction with a poster or a thread. It’s been neither. In fact, at one point you were throwing it in to a conversation between two other posters, neither of whom were interacting with you! I suggest YOU go back and reacquaint yourself with what YOU said it actually means because you clearly don’t know.

I do know what I mean and/or what my purpose is when I use TTOC.

That may well be true, but it’s not what you said it was on your thread announcing it.

It is I who am the judge, not anyone else.

Nope, you’re not. Anyone can compare your actions with your words and judge whether or not you have used TTOC in the way you said you were going to. (You’re not).

I do think that this thread is quickly moving towards wasting the time of other board members. Engage in the substance of the thread or let it go would be my suggestion.

Regards,
MG

You’re the one not responding to the substantive and qualitative points I raised in answer to your questions. You are the one evading responding. Nobody else. You.

[I Have Questions]

You said it would signify the end to your participation in an interaction with a poster or a thread. It’s been neither. In fact, at one point you were throwing it in to a conversation between two other posters, neither of whom were interacting with you! I suggest YOU go back and reacquaint yourself with what YOU said it actually means because you clearly don’t know.

I do know what I mean and/or what my purpose is when I use TTOC.

That may well be true, but it’s not what you said it was on your thread announcing it.

It is I who am the judge, not anyone else.

Nope, you’re not. Anyone can compare your actions with your words and judge whether or not you have used TTOC in the way you said you were going to. (You’re not).

I do think that this thread is quickly moving towards wasting the time of other board members. Engage in the substance of the thread or let it go would be my suggestion.

Regards,
MG

You’re the one not responding to the substantive and qualitative points I raised in answer to your questions. You are the one evading responding. Nobody else. You.

[MG 2.0]

You’re the one not responding to the substantive and qualitative points I raised in answer to your questions. You are the one evading responding. Nobody else. You.

I think I've made a number of substantiative responses in this thread. I have already given ample reason(s) for why I feel like engaging with you is more or less a waste of my time. If you want to hold to your "damn lazy" or "evasion" routine I would simply encourage others to look at what I've contributed to the thread and make your own determinations. IHQ, I think that unless you have something useful to say that ADDS to the discussions, besides doing the 'gotcha' routine that Nolan referred to, you ought to simply walk away.

But you won't.

Regards,
MG

[I Have Questions]

You’re the one not responding to the substantive and qualitative points I raised in answer to your questions. You are the one evading responding. Nobody else. You.

I think I've made a number of substantiative responses in this thread. I have already given ample reason(s) for why I feel like engaging with you is more or less a waste of my time. If you want to hold to your "damn lazy" or "evasion" routine I would simply encourage others to look at what I've contributed to the thread and make your own determinations. IHQ, I think that unless you have something useful to say that ADDS to the discussions, besides doing the 'gotcha' routine that Nolan referred to, you ought to simply walk away.

But you won't.

Regards,
MG

Universal Rule #1

Everyone is welcome. Every opinion is welcome.* Therefore, do not "de-invite" anyone or suggest that they go elsewhere. Please do not do this via e-mail or private message, either.

I’ve reported your breaking of this rule.