Maybe I'm being too hard on MG. After all, why waste precious keystrokes on things like context, evidence, or a complete sentence when you can simply say "troll."
It's not that MG is just lazy and dishonest, he also has nothing to say and he's proud of it.
Deflection and ad hominem. Simple and transparent. From a liar.
Regards,
MG
And he’s determined to prove you right Everybody Wang Chung gawd dammit.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
MG 2.0 has really upped his game, evolving from the old-fashioned "TTOC" to the devastatingly profound one-word response: "troll." It's like he's distilled his entire intellectual argument into a single insult.
The rest of us are still out here fumbling around with things like facts and reasoned debate, but he's already moved on to the next level.
Well, he’s not that bright then because it takes 25% more effort to type “Troll” than it does to type “TTOC”.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
