canpakes wrote: ↑Mon Sep 15, 2025 1:17 pm
Hound, you seem really irritated that a Groyper shot Charlie Kirk.
Hound really makes me wonder whether he even understood Charlie Kirk and what he stood for. He stood for freedom of speech, right? This young man expressed his heartfelt opinion when he marched all over that memorial. It was, I believe, a very stupid and tasteless thing to do. But, he has a
right to do it. Others did not have a right to assault him when he did it, but, hey, he had to know they would be unable to resist or, for that matter, live in accordance with the principles they claim to uphold. Charlie's own followers seem to be pretty bad at understanding what this free speech is that Charlie was a vociferous proponent of.
"He disturbs the laws of his country, he forces himself upon women, and he puts men to death without trial.” ~Otanes on the monarch, Herodotus Histories 3.80.