I don't want to say this because I still have hopes for Nick. But Nick is falling into the same trap as Adolf Hitler fell into. He better lean into his Christian faith and root out this deception that the devil planted in him.
Wow. Just wow. Sorry, but I think as far as his anti-Semitism and general racism goes, he has fallen into exactly the same trap as Adolf Hitler already. Nick Fuentes preaches Christ all the time. That does not seem to be helping him out. But this particular observation is absolutely accurate. Trump reacted to the death of his supposed friend by talking about this construction project at the White House. Weird stuff.
You can't deal with it.
"He disturbs the laws of his country, he forces himself upon women, and he puts men to death without trial.” ~Otanes on the monarch, Herodotus Histories 3.80.
If I recall correctly, Fuentes has even advocated executing all non-Christians and Democrats.
No precept or claim is more suspect or more likely to be false than one that can only be supported by invoking the claim of Divine authority for it--no matter who or what claims such authority.
What's nuts is to try to claim that Donald Trump didn't love Charlie Kirk or that his heart isn't broken over this.
[...]
Well, if Trump "loved" Kirk, he certainly showed no signs of being heartbroken in his reaction as shown in that clip, did he? "yeah, but we're building this really great ballroom"? Hello?
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
Mayan Elephant:
Not only have I denounced the Big Lie, I have denounced the Big lie big lie.
What's nuts is to try to claim that Donald Trump didn't love Charlie Kirk or that his heart isn't broken over this.
[...]
Well, if Trump "loved" Kirk, he certainly showed no signs of being heartbroken in his reaction as shown in that clip, did he? "yeah, but we're building this really great ballroom"? Hello?
Well let's say that Nick is right. What if Trump was guilty of being more interested in talking about his construction project than Charlie Kirk at that moment? Are you now going to tell me that because of that I should now start supporting leftists chanting, "Rest in piss, you won't be missed, Charlie Kirk."
And when the Confederates saw Jackson standing fearless like a stonewall, the army of Northern Virginia took courage and drove the federal army off their land.
Well, if Trump "loved" Kirk, he certainly showed no signs of being heartbroken in his reaction as shown in that clip, did he? "yeah, but we're building this really great ballroom"? Hello?
Well let's say that Nick is right. What if Trump was guilty of being more interested in talking about his construction project than Charlie Kirk at that moment? Are you now going to tell me that because of that I should now start supporting leftists chanting, "Rest in piss, you won't be missed, Charlie Kirk."
Not at all. I merely wanted to point out that your claim that "Donald Trump [loved] Charlie Kirk [and] his heart [is] broken over this" is inconsistent with his reaction to the killing. Trump's behaviour was, I suggest, more consistent with my view of him as a person who cares about nothing and nobody but himself.
What you choose to do in view of that is entirely up to you. By all means continue to express your esteem for Kirk, and to deplore his murder. As I hope you are aware, I am certainly amongst those who think that his murder was a criminal act that does profound damage to the structure of US political discourse, although I find many of his views repellent and I think his 'debate' style was not designed to allow any real dialogue with his opponents to take place.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
Mayan Elephant:
Not only have I denounced the Big Lie, I have denounced the Big lie big lie.
Well let's say that Nick is right. What if Trump was guilty of being more interested in talking about his construction project than Charlie Kirk at that moment? Are you now going to tell me that because of that I should now start supporting leftists chanting, "Rest in piss, you won't be missed, Charlie Kirk."
I’d settle for you seeing Trump as he is, not as you want him to be. Since I would never say anything so callous about Kirk’s horrible assassination, why would you imagine I would want you to say something like that? You have more options than two bad ones. You could choose to be a compassionate person who behaves respectfully—something neither those chanters, nor our president, can seem to manage. It really isn’t so hard to be a decent person. In fact, one might argue that in certain ways it takes much less effort than being a bad one.
"He disturbs the laws of his country, he forces himself upon women, and he puts men to death without trial.” ~Otanes on the monarch, Herodotus Histories 3.80.
I don't want to say this because I still have hopes for Nick. But Nick is falling into the same trap as Adolf Hitler fell into. He better lean into his Christian faith and root out this deception that the devil planted in him.
What's nuts is to try to claim that Donald Trump didn't love Charlie Kirk or that his heart isn't broken over this. Isn't that the motto of the left after Charlies assasination, "Too bad we couldn't get Trump as well?" Of course we know they're desperately trying. Donald Trump is not perfect but he's so much better than any other option Red America has had since Reagen, that there is no sane reason for Nick to be attacking Trump, other than recognizing that the devil has gotten hold of Nick's mind.
Trump is already in the same trap as Hitler. It's astonishing you keep defending him. So a good friend of his died, and all he wants to do is crow about the multi million dollar building he is building, and... you are O.K. with that. Got it.
I don't want to say this because I still have hopes for Nick. But Nick is falling into the same trap as Adolf Hitler fell into. He better lean into his Christian faith and root out this deception that the devil planted in him.
What's nuts is to try to claim that Donald Trump didn't love Charlie Kirk or that his heart isn't broken over this. Isn't that the motto of the left after Charlies assasination, "Too bad we couldn't get Trump as well?" Of course we know they're desperately trying. Donald Trump is not perfect but he's so much better than any other option Red America has had since Reagen, that there is no sane reason for Nick to be attacking Trump, other than recognizing that the devil has gotten hold of Nick's mind.
Trump is already in the same trap as Hitler. It's astonishing you keep defending him. So a good friend of his died, and all he wants to do is crow about the multi million dollar building he is building, and... you are O.K. with that. Got it.
Explain the authoritarian difference between you and Fuentes. At this point, I don't see one. Do you? Can one then conclude that you are in the same trap as Hitler? Maybe we need to proceed with that as a baseline?
Nick seems to want the government to smash us with his ideology. You want the same exact damn thing? No? Same smash different ideology? I don't see daylight between you and Nick. Just different colored shirts. Help me out here.
Ban Whiskey permanently if that's the only way.
— Gadianton
