More spooky woo-woo from DCP

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
I Have Questions
God
Posts: 4268
Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am

Re: More spooky woo-woo from DCP

Post by I Have Questions »

I thought this was an interesting article about NDE's...
Near-death experiences have been reported across time and cultures. An astounding 5 to 10 percent of the general population is estimated to have memories of an NDE, including somewhere between 10 and 23 percent of cardiac arrest survivors. A growing number of scholars now accept NDEs as a unique mental state that can offer novel insights into the nature of consciousness. “Now, clearly, we don’t question anymore the reality of near-death experiences,” says Charlotte Martial, a neuroscientist at the University of Liège in Belgium. “People who report an experience really did experience something.”

Those who undergo an NDE also return with “this noetic quality from the experience, which very often changes their life,” adds neuroscientist Christof Koch of the Allen Institute in Seattle, who writes about NDEs and other states of consciousness in his 2024 book, Then I Am Myself the World. “They know what they’ve seen.”

A handful of researchers, mostly emergency room doctors, began collecting qualitative data about NDEs after the 1975 publication of psychiatrist and physician Raymond A. Moody’s book Life after Life, which detailed patients’ accounts of near-death experiences. Since then, only a few research teams have attempted to empirically investigate the neurobiology of NDEs. But their findings are already challenging long-held beliefs about the dying brain, including that consciousness ceases almost immediately after the heart stops beating. This discovery has important implications for current resuscitation practices, which are based on outdated beliefs about what happens to the brain during cardiac arrest, says neuroscientist Jimo Borjigin of the University of Michigan Medical School. “If we understand the mechanisms of death, then this could lead to new ways of saving lives.”

Like psychedelic drugs and other means of altering consciousness, NDEs could also serve as probes for revealing fundamental truths about the mind and brain. Such states are perturbations to the system of consciousness, “and when you perturb a system, you understand better how it works,” says Christopher Timmermann, a postdoctoral fellow at the Center for Psychedelic Research at Imperial College London. “If we want to understand the nature of experience, we have to take into account what’s happening at the margins of nonordinary states.”

Moreover, there are important existential implications, although exactly what those might be continues to be debated in the scientific literature and at conferences, including at a 2023 meeting held by the New York Academy of Sciences. It explored consciousness through the lens of death, psychedelics and mysticism. “These transcendent experiences are found in the major world religions and traditions,” says Anthony Bossis, a clinical assistant professor of psychiatry at the New York University Grossman School of Medicine, who helped to organize the conference. “Might they have some greater purpose for helping humanity cultivate understanding and awareness of consciousness?” he asks. The weightiness of such questions makes careful study of NDEs and their rigorous interpretation all the more critical, Martial says: “It’s important to disentangle empirical findings versus belief.”
Bolding is mine.
Somewhat surprisingly, religious people don’t seem to be more inclined toward NDEs. There is, however, preliminary evidence of another group being more likely to have NDEs: those who are prone to REM sleep intrusion, a condition that occurs when rapid eye movement (REM) sleep intrudes into wakefulness and blends elements of dreaming and waking. During the seconds or minutes it lasts for, people may have an out-of-body experience, sense that someone or something is in the room with them, or want to move but find that they can’t. In 2019 Daniel Kondziella, a neurologist at the Copenhagen University Hospital network’s Rigshospitalet, and his colleagues recruited a sample of 1,034 adults from the general population in 35 countries. Ten percent of the study participants had experienced an NDE, and of those, 47 percent also reported REM sleep intrusion—a statistically significant association. Among the people who had not had NDEs, just 14 percent reported REM sleep intrusion.
Other scientists flatly disagree. “When you have an NDE, you must have a functioning brain to store the memory, and you have to survive with an intact brain so you can retrieve that memory and tell about it,” Kondziella says. “You can’t do that without a functioning brain, so all those arguments that NDEs prove that there’s consciousness outside the brain are simply nonsense.”

Kondziella, Martial, and others instead theorize that NDEs might be part of a last-ditch survival tactic. Species across the animal kingdom “play dead”—a behavior technically called thanatosis—when they perceive a mortal threat, typically from an attacking predator. If fight-or-flight fails, the instinct to feign death kicks in as an attempt to forestall the danger. The animal becomes immobilized and unresponsive to external stimuli—but with continued awareness so that, given a chance, it can escape. “Personally, I believe the evolutionary aspect really is the key to understanding what NDEs are and how they came about,” Kondziella says. “There is a perfectly valid biological explanation.”
In the study, 13 volunteers received intravenous DMT in a lab setting and rated their experience on a scale commonly used to measure NDEs, as developed by psychiatrist Bruce Greyson in 1983. The researchers compared the DMT group’s scores and subjective accounts with other people’s taken from an NDE database that Martial and her colleagues have been compiling since 2016. (The database includes around 2,000 accounts, accepted from anyone who contacts the Liège team claiming to have had an NDE and then fills out a lengthy questionnaire.)

They found “striking overlap” between the DMT and NDE groups, Martial says, with people in both describing a sense of entering into an unearthly realm, separating from their body, encountering mystical beings and seeing a bright light. People in both groups also reported feelings of peace, unity and joy. There was just one significant difference: those in the NDE group more frequently experienced reaching a border demarcating a point of no return.

Roland Griffiths, a psychiatrist at Johns Hopkins University who pioneered studies of psilocybin and who died in October 2023, reported similar findings with his colleagues in 2022. The authors compared 3,192 people who had undergone an NDE, a psychedelic drug trip or a non-drug-induced mystical experience. The team found “remarkably similar” long-term outcomes across subjects in all three groups, including a reduced fear of death and lasting positive effects of insights they had gained.
If Peterson is going to introduce his little audience to the notion of NDE's he should not be so careless as to just present them within the small and isolated context of 'life after death because God'. He should also draw their attention to the more likely explanations for them, as demonstrated when they are properly studied. To not do so is being a tad dishonest with his readership.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
Chap
God
Posts: 3260
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 8:42 am
Location: On the imaginary axis

Re: More spooky woo-woo from DCP

Post by Chap »

Everybody Wang Chung wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 8:36 pm
Absolutely. When you apply basic economics, the entire house of psychic cards comes crashing down.

The fact that not a single psychic has managed to beat the lottery, let alone short a major corporation before its public implosion or forecast the stock markets, is pretty damning. Psychics/remote-viewers/dowsers seem perfectly suited for low-end scenarios that are conveniently unprovable.

Patheos should be embarrassed. Sic et Non and Ye Shall Prosper In The Land have all but guaranteed people will continue to view Mormonism as a strange cult.
That is the killer response to wistful woo-woo stuff like the above story. If that kind of thing was possible, then:

(a) People would have found a way of making money out of it (that is, apart from posting stuff on dollar-earning blogs).

but also ...

(b) Given the immense advantages in terms of survival, mate-seeking etc. offered by such capacities, they would have been heavily selected for by evolution over many millennia - not only would most or all human beings by now possess them as a matter of course, but even some other anthropoids, and possibly some other species to some degree.

The first point has been previously made on this board. Is the second point not also worthy of attention?
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
Mayan Elephant:
Not only have I denounced the Big Lie, I have denounced the Big lie big lie.
drumdude
God
Posts: 8042
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:29 am

Re: More spooky woo-woo from DCP

Post by drumdude »

Chap wrote:
Sun Sep 14, 2025 11:30 am
Everybody Wang Chung wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 8:36 pm
Absolutely. When you apply basic economics, the entire house of psychic cards comes crashing down.

The fact that not a single psychic has managed to beat the lottery, let alone short a major corporation before its public implosion or forecast the stock markets, is pretty damning. Psychics/remote-viewers/dowsers seem perfectly suited for low-end scenarios that are conveniently unprovable.

Patheos should be embarrassed. Sic et Non and Ye Shall Prosper In The Land have all but guaranteed people will continue to view Mormonism as a strange cult.
That is the killer response to wistful woo-woo stuff like the above story. If that kind of thing was possible, then:

(a) People would have found a way of making money out of it (that is, apart from posting stuff on dollar-earning blogs).

but also ...

(b) Given the immense advantages in terms of survival, mate-seeking etc. offered by such capacities, they would have been heavily selected for by evolution over many millennia - not only would most or all human beings by now possess them as a matter of course, but even some other anthropoids, and possibly some other species to some degree.

The first point has been previously made on this board. Is the second point not also worthy of attention?
The evolutionary argument is very powerful too.

The only escape from it is that these supposed supernatural powers are random and inconsistent, such that evolution cannot reliably select for them.

This fits into DCP’s worldview that Mormon God is intentionally hidden. He hides through tricks, lies, deception, randomness, arbitrariness, etc. So that he can send as few souls into the celestial kingdom as possible. You wouldn’t want him appearing to everyone like he did to Joseph Smith, obviously. That would be too easy.

These are the kind of basic implications that follow directly from DCP’s poorly thought out beliefs. I suspect it’s why he’s never going to finish his book. They’ll look absolutely childish when all laid out in one place.
User avatar
malkie
God
Posts: 2857
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:41 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: More spooky woo-woo from DCP

Post by malkie »

Chap wrote:
Sun Sep 14, 2025 11:30 am
Everybody Wang Chung wrote:
Sat Sep 13, 2025 8:36 pm
Absolutely. When you apply basic economics, the entire house of psychic cards comes crashing down.

The fact that not a single psychic has managed to beat the lottery, let alone short a major corporation before its public implosion or forecast the stock markets, is pretty damning. Psychics/remote-viewers/dowsers seem perfectly suited for low-end scenarios that are conveniently unprovable.

Patheos should be embarrassed. Sic et Non and Ye Shall Prosper In The Land have all but guaranteed people will continue to view Mormonism as a strange cult.
That is the killer response to wistful woo-woo stuff like the above story. If that kind of thing was possible, then:

(a) People would have found a way of making money out of it (that is, apart from posting stuff on dollar-earning blogs).

but also ...

(b) Given the immense advantages in terms of survival, mate-seeking etc. offered by such capacities, they would have been heavily selected for by evolution over many millennia - not only would most or all human beings by now possess them as a matter of course, but even some other anthropoids, and possibly some other species to some degree.

The first point has been previously made on this board. Is the second point not also worthy of attention?
(c) Although it would be highly classified, I'm pretty sure there would be some "smoke" about military uses of remote viewing.

Of course, if people with the capability were anything like the hero of the Stephen King novel, Carrie, ...
You can help Ukraine by talking for an hour a week!! PM me, or check www.enginprogram.org for details.
Слава Україні!, 𝑺𝒍𝒂𝒗𝒂 𝑼𝒌𝒓𝒂𝒊𝒏𝒊!
I Have Questions
God
Posts: 4268
Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am

Re: More spooky woo-woo from DCP

Post by I Have Questions »

malkie wrote:
Sun Sep 14, 2025 2:58 pm
Chap wrote:
Sun Sep 14, 2025 11:30 am


That is the killer response to wistful woo-woo stuff like the above story. If that kind of thing was possible, then:

(a) People would have found a way of making money out of it (that is, apart from posting stuff on dollar-earning blogs).

but also ...

(b) Given the immense advantages in terms of survival, mate-seeking etc. offered by such capacities, they would have been heavily selected for by evolution over many millennia - not only would most or all human beings by now possess them as a matter of course, but even some other anthropoids, and possibly some other species to some degree.

The first point has been previously made on this board. Is the second point not also worthy of attention?
(c) Although it would be highly classified, I'm pretty sure there would be some "smoke" about military uses of remote viewing.

Of course, if people with the capability were anything like the hero of the Stephen King novel, Carrie, ...
Well now that you mention it... The Men Who Stare At Goats
The Men Who Stare at Goats is a 2009 satirical black comedy war film directed by Grant Heslov and written by Peter Straughan. It is loosely based on the 2004 book by Jon Ronson, about an investigation into attempts by the U.S. military to employ psychic powers as a weapon.[4][5] The film stars George Clooney, Ewan McGregor, Jeff Bridges, and Kevin Spacey.
...is based on Colonel John B. Alexander
John B. Alexander (born 1937) is a retired United States Army colonel. An infantry officer for much of his career, he is best known as a leading advocate for the development of non-lethal weapons and of military applications of the paranormal. He has written and lectured on UFOs.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
User avatar
Physics Guy
God
Posts: 2306
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 7:40 am
Location: on the battlefield of life

Re: More spooky woo-woo from DCP

Post by Physics Guy »

Whenever NDEs come up I want to make a plug for Connie Willis’s novel Passage. It manages to be sensible while using enough poetic license not to be depressing, and it’s cool the way it seizes the opportunity to do things you normally can’t do in fiction.
I was a teenager before it was cool.
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 8272
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: More spooky woo-woo from DCP

Post by MG 2.0 »

Physics Guy wrote:
Wed Sep 17, 2025 6:44 pm
Whenever NDEs come up I want to make a plug for Connie Willis’s novel Passage. It manages to be sensible while using enough poetic license not to be depressing, and it’s cool the way it seizes the opportunity to do things you normally can’t do in fiction.
I’m going to make another plug for Douthat’s book, “Believe”. Materialists/skeptics will “poo poo” it right off the bat since it doesn’t support their worldview. The reason I mention it in this thread is that if one has a belief in something greater than us having something to do with us, it is only one more step to travel to entertain the idea that we might also be co-eternal with that ‘something greater’. That then brings in anthropomorphism which one of the comments on Goodreads refers to in reference to Douthat’s book:

His best arguments are those that run along the lines of the Anthropic Principle, explaining how incredibly fine-tuned the universe must be for life to even become a possibility. The idea of every single one of a large list of fundamental physical constants being so precisely set by sheer chance alone is so astronomically unlikely as to be frankly absurd. Such a belief surely requires more faith than the belief in a creator God. The implications of this apparent fine-tuning of the universe has led some to propose the entirely speculative multiverse theory rather than reconsider their presuppositions. So much for Occam’s Razor. Or for the claim of only believing what can be scientifically demonstrated.
This brings us another step closer to being a bit more circumspect/careful about ‘poo pooing’ or “woo wooing”NDE’s as a whole.

Woo-woo seems to be in vogue currently by some posters. As is the constant **it canning of DCP.

Regards,
MG
Marcus
God
Posts: 8039
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm

Re: More spooky woo-woo from DCP

Post by Marcus »

Physics Guy wrote:
Wed Sep 17, 2025 6:44 pm
Whenever NDEs come up I want to make a plug for Connie Willis’s novel Passage. It manages to be sensible while using enough poetic license not to be depressing, and it’s cool the way it seizes the opportunity to do things you normally can’t do in fiction.
I was thinking about the novel, also! Good call.
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 8272
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: More spooky woo-woo from DCP

Post by MG 2.0 »

Marcus wrote:
Wed Sep 17, 2025 11:30 pm
Physics Guy wrote:
Wed Sep 17, 2025 6:44 pm
Whenever NDEs come up I want to make a plug for Connie Willis’s novel Passage. It manages to be sensible while using enough poetic license not to be depressing, and it’s cool the way it seizes the opportunity to do things you normally can’t do in fiction.
I was thinking about the novel, also! Good call.
Marcus, I’ve noticed something about you over a period of time now. You can have relevant and interesting information or commentary placed right in front of your face and you are blind to it. Over and over and over. It is almost as if you are willfully ignorant, narrow minded, and intentionally cut off from intellectual depth and breadth. What has brought that on over an apparently long period of time, who knows?

But honestly, it’s not a good look when you come into threads where I am trying to add to the discussion and you pop a one liner that really…really…is rather thoughtless. “ I was thinking about the novel, also! Good call.”

Good grief.

You talk about religious people being dogmatic and inflexible. Look in the mirror. It’s actually getting in the way of you coming across as an intelligent human being. You can do better. Everybody is watching.

Regards,
MG
drumdude
God
Posts: 8042
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:29 am

Re: More spooky woo-woo from DCP

Post by drumdude »

MG 2.0 wrote:
Wed Sep 17, 2025 11:53 pm
Marcus wrote:
Wed Sep 17, 2025 11:30 pm

I was thinking about the novel, also! Good call.
Marcus, I’ve noticed something about you over a period of time now. You can have relevant and interesting information or commentary placed right in front of your face and you are blind to it. Over and over and over. It is almost as if you are willfully ignorant, narrow minded, and intentionally cut off from intellectual depth and breadth. What has brought that on over an apparently long period of time, who knows?

But honestly, it’s not a good look when you come into threads where I am trying to add to the discussion and you pop a one liner that really…really…is rather thoughtless. “ I was thinking about the novel, also! Good call.”

Good grief.

You talk about religious people being dogmatic and inflexible. Look in the mirror. It’s actually getting in the way of you coming across as an intelligent human being. You can do better. Everybody is watching.

Regards,
MG
I found her comment completely appropriate and salient.
Post Reply