Nick Fuentes Criticizes Trump

[Whiskey]

https://x.com/nickjfuentes/status/19698 ... a7cSl5oIZg


Does Schmo, Philo or Pancakes disagree with Fuentes? Anyone?

Does Shmo, Philo or pancakes disagree with the decision from an authoritarian perspective? I see not a hint of distance. None.

[canpakes]

I think that the only whining and flailing is coming from yourself, after being called out for pretending that Schmo is anything like someone leading a political movement to threaten and harass people, deny the Holocaust, or proclaim that Jews and women are the source of America’s woes.

But it’s cool to watch you try to single out Schmo, while ignoring the magnitude of Fuentes’s words.

No no no.

The outcome Shmoe and Philo want may vary from the outcome that Fuentes wants.


Though, their authoritarian ideologies and to your point, victimization, is shared almost perfectly. Can’t see a distinction there. Can you?

Their authoritarian ideologies are not similar. If they were you would have broken that down instead of dancing around vague generalities, but that’s probably not going to happen when your argument boils down to a version of, ‘people who criticize x are also x’. Substitute ‘Nazi’, as a random example, and the failure of that argument becomes obvious.

Besides, Hound has everyone beat on the victimization front. I’ve never seen anyone write so much about what a victim he and his imagined allies are.

[Whiskey]

No no no.

The outcome Shmoe and Philo want may vary from the outcome that Fuentes wants.


Though, their authoritarian ideologies and to your point, victimization, is shared almost perfectly. Can’t see a distinction there. Can you?

Their authoritarian ideologies are not similar. If they were you would have broken that down instead of dancing around vague generalities, but that’s probably not going to happen when your argument boils down to a version of, ‘people who criticize x are also x’. Substitute ‘Nazi’, as a random example, and the failure of that argument becomes obvious.

Besides, Hound has everyone beat on the victimization front. I’ve never seen anyone write so much about what a victim he and his imagined allies are.

None of your whatabouts apply here. Hound’s victimization does not have any relevance. I have not made anything close to the analogies you just imagined. Neither do I have any idea what point you are making.

The authoritarian ideologies of you, Philo, Fuentes and Shcmo are indistinguishable. While you may want different outcomes, you seem to all have the same tolerance and expectations of authority.

[canpakes]

Their authoritarian ideologies are not similar. If they were you would have broken that down instead of dancing around vague generalities, but that’s probably not going to happen when your argument boils down to a version of, ‘people who criticize x are also x’. Substitute ‘Nazi’, as a random example, and the failure of that argument becomes obvious.

Besides, Hound has everyone beat on the victimization front. I’ve never seen anyone write so much about what a victim he and his imagined allies are.

None of your whatabouts apply here. Hound’s victimization does not have any relevance. I have not made anything close to the analogies you just imagined. Neither do I have any idea what point you are making.

I’d suppose that your ‘whatabouts’ are similarly dismissed.

That was easy. : D

The authoritarian ideologies of you, Philo, Fuentes and Shcmo are indistinguishable. While you may want different outcomes, you seem to all have the same tolerance and expectations of authority.

As your own authoritarian ideology is indistinguishable from Vladimir Putin. Simply because I put as much effort into the claim as you, and merely said so.

That was easy. : D

[Whiskey]

None of your whatabouts apply here. Hound’s victimization does not have any relevance. I have not made anything close to the analogies you just imagined. Neither do I have any idea what point you are making.

I’d suppose that your ‘whatabouts’ are similarly dismissed.

That was easy. : D

The authoritarian ideologies of you, Philo, Fuentes and Shcmo are indistinguishable. While you may want different outcomes, you seem to all have the same tolerance and expectations of authority.

As your own authoritarian ideology is indistinguishable from Vladimir Putin. Simply because I put as much effort into the claim as you, and merely said so.

That was easy. : D

No. I believe Putin’s ideology is not aligned with mine. His elections are janky AF and the states within Russia seem to have no autonomy. We are not aligned in most ways.

With you and Fuentes, on the other hand. There seems to be nothing that differentiates you. Maybe pick a topic and compare them. Abortion? Trans? Hellifino. I don’t see that you, Shcmo and Fuentes are different from the perspective of authority.

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

"You can defeat forty scholars with one fact, but you cannot defeat an idiot with forty facts."

- Some guy who was dealing with what we’re dealing with.

You know. One thing the Top and Bottom have taught me ever since they ‘graced’ our board with their digital buttholes is that I no longer believe in democracy any more. I believe in a meritocracy. You should have to pass a test to vote. Something simple like:

If today is Tuesday then I will wear blue. I did not wear blue. What can you conclude about whether today is Tuesday?

Obviously most MAGAs would fail. It’s the only way to save this Republic.

- Doc

[canpakes]

I’d suppose that your ‘whatabouts’ are similarly dismissed.

That was easy. : D



As your own authoritarian ideology is indistinguishable from Vladimir Putin. Simply because I put as much effort into the claim as you, and merely said so.

That was easy. : D

No. I believe Putin’s ideology is not aligned with mine. His elections are janky AF and the states within Russia seem to have no autonomy. We are not aligned in most ways.

With you and Fuentes, on the other hand. There seems to be nothing that differentiates you. Maybe pick a topic and compare them. Abortion? Trans? Hellifino. I don’t see that you, Shcmo and Fuentes are different from the perspective of authority.

Oh, Binger. Your ADHD must be kicking in again, because you were talking about authoritarian tendencies, but now you’ve switched to elections (admittedly a favorite of your conspiracy-addled imagination) and who knows what else will follow, now. Coffee or tea? Paper or plastic? Let’s see you slide into full distraction mode as you try to walk away from your nonsensical statements.

And if you want to go down those roads, start new topics. Otherwise you could stick to explaining how Schmo is the same sort of authoritarian threat as Nick Fuentes. If you can.

[Whiskey]

"You can defeat forty scholars with one fact, but you cannot defeat an idiot with forty facts."

- Some guy who was dealing with what we’re dealing with.

You know. One thing the Top and Bottom have taught me ever since they ‘graced’ our board with their digital buttholes is that I no longer believe in democracy any more. I believe in a meritocracy. You should have to pass a test to vote. Something simple like:

If today is Tuesday then I will wear blue. I did not wear blue. What can you conclude about whether today is Tuesday?

Obviously most MAGAs would fail. It’s the only way to save this Republic.

- Doc

Undoubtedly, Fuentes would agree with you. Doesn’t make it factual, but y’all would agree.

[canpakes]

"You can defeat forty scholars with one fact, but you cannot defeat an idiot with forty facts."

- Some guy who was dealing with what we’re dealing with.

You know. One thing the Top and Bottom have taught me ever since they ‘graced’ our board with their digital buttholes is that I no longer believe in democracy any more. I believe in a meritocracy. You should have to pass a test to vote. Something simple like:

If today is Tuesday then I will wear blue. I did not wear blue. What can you conclude about whether today is Tuesday?

Obviously most MAGAs would fail. It’s the only way to save this Republic.

- Doc

I’d wager that Binger will stomp his feet and say that you’re just like the person who is wearing blue today, and Hound will post about how you’re a progressive and need to apologize for not being sufficiently sorry about the death of a podcaster, followed by demands that the board institute a period of mourning so that conservatives won’t feel hurt.

[Whiskey]

No. I believe Putin’s ideology is not aligned with mine. His elections are janky AF and the states within Russia seem to have no autonomy. We are not aligned in most ways.

With you and Fuentes, on the other hand. There seems to be nothing that differentiates you. Maybe pick a topic and compare them. Abortion? Trans? Hellifino. I don’t see that you, Shcmo and Fuentes are different from the perspective of authority.

Oh, Binger. Your ADHD must be kicking in again, because you were talking about authoritarian tendencies, but now you’ve switched to elections (admittedly a favorite of your conspiracy-addled imagination) and who knows what else will follow, now. Coffee or tea? Paper or plastic? Let’s see you slide into full distraction mode as you try to walk away from your nonsensical statements.

And if you want to go down those roads, start new topics. Otherwise you could stick to explaining how Schmo is the same sort of authoritarian threat as Nick Fuentes. If you can.

Been asking all along for examples where you and Fuentes don’t share authoritarian positions. I also addressed your unfounded suggestion.

Schmo and you and others share the common ideology, like Fuentes, that the ultimate authority of the government can and should be used to achieve crap. The peasants are too dumb, remember? Me included. Gotta have the authority step in and rid the peasants from the process. Isn’t that what was just suggested? You agree with Cam, right?