Oh, Binger. Your ADHD must be kicking in again, because you were talking about authoritarian tendencies, but now you’ve switched to elections (admittedly a favorite of your conspiracy-addled imagination) and who knows what else will follow, now. Coffee or tea? Paper or plastic? Let’s see you slide into full distraction mode as you try to walk away from your nonsensical statements.
And if you want to go down those roads, start new topics. Otherwise you could stick to explaining how Schmo is the same sort of authoritarian threat as Nick Fuentes. If you can.
Been asking all along for examples where you and Fuentes don’t share authoritarian positions. I also addressed your unfounded suggestion.
No, you haven’t addressed anything, because you rarely say anything.
Schmo and you and others share the common ideology, like Fuentes, that the ultimate authority of the government can and should be used to achieve crap.
Like build a national highway system. Or raise a standing army. Probably most everyone can agree on that.
Because most everyone agrees with those examples, then you equivocate that we’re all the same in an ‘authoritarian’ sense.
I guess that these arguments work on MAGA-minded folks, but you’ll probably need to try harder with other audiences.
Been asking all along for examples where you and Fuentes don’t share authoritarian positions. I also addressed your unfounded suggestion.
No, you haven’t addressed anything, because you rarely say anything.
Schmo and you and others share the common ideology, like Fuentes, that the ultimate authority of the government can and should be used to achieve crap.
Like build a national highway system. Or raise a standing army. Probably most everyone can agree on that.
Because most everyone agrees with those examples, then you equivocate that we’re all the same in an ‘authoritarian’ sense.
I guess that these arguments work on MAGA-minded folks, but you’ll probably need to try harder with other audiences.
Excellent examples. Federalized infrastructure and military. Anything else? On that you and Fuentes agree. Still not seeing any differences.
Ban Whiskey permanently if that's the only way.
— Gadianton
No, you haven’t addressed anything, because you rarely say anything.
Like build a national highway system. Or raise a standing army. Probably most everyone can agree on that.
Because most everyone agrees with those examples, then you equivocate that we’re all the same in an ‘authoritarian’ sense.
I guess that these arguments work on MAGA-minded folks, but you’ll probably need to try harder with other audiences.
Excellent examples. Federalized infrastructure and military. Anything else? On that you and Fuentes agree. Still not seeing any differences.
No additional examples are necessary. This is the entirety of your argument. The aim is merely to be contrary and hope that a point is made to, perhaps, dull thinkers. The result ends up that most are aware that you don’t actually engage a subject, as opposed to merely using a single example to ‘prove similarity’.
You might as well have proclaimed that Schmo and Fuentes are exactly the same because they both have 5 toes on each foot.
Excellent examples. Federalized infrastructure and military. Anything else? On that you and Fuentes agree. Still not seeing any differences.
No additional examples are necessary. This is the entirety of your argument. The aim is merely to be contrary and hope that a point is made to, perhaps, dull thinkers. The result ends up that most are aware that you don’t actually engage a subject, as opposed to merely using a single example to ‘prove similarity’.
You might as well have proclaimed that Schmo and Fuentes are exactly the same because they both have 5 toes on each foot.
Wrong. Additional examples may show a differemce between your authoritarianism and that of Fuentes. Without examples of differences, it seems the commonalities are nearly comprehensive.
Ban Whiskey permanently if that's the only way.
— Gadianton
No additional examples are necessary. This is the entirety of your argument. The aim is merely to be contrary and hope that a point is made to, perhaps, dull thinkers. The result ends up that most are aware that you don’t actually engage a subject, as opposed to merely using a single example to ‘prove similarity’.
You might as well have proclaimed that Schmo and Fuentes are exactly the same because they both have 5 toes on each foot.
Wrong. Additional examples may show a differemce between your authoritarianism and that of Fuentes. Without examples of differences, it seems the commonalities are nearly comprehensive.
No. That’s a failure of logic. And if you are the one claiming that X is the same as Y, it’s on you to show how that works out.
Merely proclaiming it, is just lazy and doesn’t advance your argument past stamping your feet.
Wrong. Additional examples may show a differemce between your authoritarianism and that of Fuentes. Without examples of differences, it seems the commonalities are nearly comprehensive.
No. That’s a failure of logic. And if you are the one claiming that X is the same as Y, it’s on you to show how that works out.
Merely proclaiming it, is just lazy and doesn’t advance your argument past stamping your feet.
Okay. Take abortion. Does Fuentes and Schmo differ at all? Even slightly? Both think the Feds are the authority. Right?
Unaware of any exceptions. Same with you. You don’t want to withhold any federal authority, correct?
Ban Whiskey permanently if that's the only way.
— Gadianton
Okay. Take abortion. Does Fuentes and Schmo differ at all? Even slightly? Both think the Feds are the authority. Right?
Unaware of any exceptions. Same with you. You don’t want to withhold any federal authority, correct?
Lol, Binger. Get them on the phone and ask them. I don’t suspect that you’ll receive the answer that you think you will. : D
So you dom’t know? Okay. i’ll tell you. Schmo thinks the feds should make abortion free and legal in Every state. Fuentes says the feds should make abortion illegal in all 50 states.
I disagree with both those guys. And they agree om the authority.
I think the feds can pound sand.
Have any other examples?
Ban Whiskey permanently if that's the only way.
— Gadianton
Lol, Binger. Get them on the phone and ask them. I don’t suspect that you’ll receive the answer that you think you will. : D
So you dom’t know? Okay. i’ll tell you. Schmo thinks the feds should make abortion free and legal in Every state. Fuentes says the feds should make abortion illegal in all 50 states.
I disagree with both those guys. And they agree om the authority.
I think the feds can pound sand.
Have any other examples?
1. Can you point to a reference for Schmo believing that abortion should be ‘free’?
2. Are you going with the claim that two people believing two different things have the same authoritarian viewpoint because they may both believe that the law should be adhered to?
So you dom’t know? Okay. i’ll tell you. Schmo thinks the feds should make abortion free and legal in Every state. Fuentes says the feds should make abortion illegal in all 50 states.
I disagree with both those guys. And they agree om the authority.
I think the feds can pound sand.
Have any other examples?
1. Can you point to a reference for Schmo believing that abortion should be ‘free’?
2. Are you going with the claim that two people believing two different things have the same authoritarian viewpoint because they may both believe that the law should be adhered to?
Can you do any better than a false equivocation?
1. He said he is Canadian
2. So close. So close. They both have the same authoritarian viewpoint, yes. But its only because they have the same authoritarian viewpoint.
Ban Whiskey permanently if that's the only way.
— Gadianton
