Democrat Majority in House before Midterms?

[huckelberry]

Gunnar, I often incline to agree with your comments but I think you are a bit carried away here. Perhaps remembering that the House does not have authority to remove a president from office gives perspective. I think your wish is very remote. The next presidential election is more likely to be able to effect change.

By the way, I find Whiskey often a bit unclear but in this case I saw no uncertainty. Whiskey saw Jones as not trustworthy, not reliable, and not a good source. Unlike his follow up insult, I just think you got carried away in a rush missing what he meant.

[huckelberry]

Whiskey, perhaps you blanket your posts with so many dime store insults that it is easy to miss if you have a point in there someplace. Sometimes you do.

I understand you to occasionally point out that the left's obsession with Trump contributes to his popularity and drowns out any message the left could contribute. At least that thought has crossed my mind on occasion.

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

Whiskey, perhaps you blanket your posts with so many dime store insults that it is easy to miss if you have a point in there someplace. Sometimes you do.

I understand you to occasionally point out that the left's obsession with Trump contributes to his popularity and drowns out any message the left could contribute. At least that thought has crossed my mind on occasion.

A Republican politician who used the handle of “joebidennnn69” and was deeply involved with Moms for Liberty was popped for all sorts of nasty crimes with kids.

So, what was your point again, Huck?

[Whiskey]

I understand you to occasionally point out that the left's obsession with Trump contributes to his popularity and drowns out any message the left could contribute. At least that thought has crossed my mind on occasion.

I have not pointed this out just on occasion. I have made this point emphatically.

I will give you a few examples. When Pelosi got drunk or stupid and ripped up Trump's speech - what happened? Frankly, the speech was not that good. It really was not impressive at all. It was weak sauce to be real and honest. But, now, Pelosi just made an advertisement that basically said, "Trump ain't part of this bitch's crap, and that is a good thing."

This daily obsession about Trump at the grassroots or miniature forum level does more for Trump than it hurts him. It helps him. It draws a line in the sand and asks - are these clownass obsessed lunatic victims just like you? Are they credible or just crazy AF? It drives people to Trump, not away. It drives people away from the lunatic fringe rather than draw them toward it.

[canpakes]

I understand you to occasionally point out that the left's obsession with Trump contributes to his popularity and drowns out any message the left could contribute. At least that thought has crossed my mind on occasion.

I have not pointed this out just on occasion. I have made this point emphatically.

I will give you a few examples. When Pelosi got drunk or stupid and ripped up Trump's speech - what happened? Frankly, the speech was not that good. It really was not impressive at all. It was weak sauce to be real and honest. But, now, Pelosi just made an advertisement that basically said, "Trump ain't part of this bitch's crap, and that is a good thing."

This daily obsession about Trump at the grassroots or miniature forum level does more for Trump than it hurts him. It helps him. It draws a line in the sand and asks - are these clownass obsessed lunatic victims just like you? Are they credible or just crazy AF? It drives people to Trump, not away. It drives people away from the lunatic fringe rather than draw them toward it.

I don’t think that your reverse psychology attempt here will work on Huck, either.

[Whiskey]

I have not pointed this out just on occasion. I have made this point emphatically.

I will give you a few examples. When Pelosi got drunk or stupid and ripped up Trump's speech - what happened? Frankly, the speech was not that good. It really was not impressive at all. It was weak sauce to be real and honest. But, now, Pelosi just made an advertisement that basically said, "Trump ain't part of this bitch's crap, and that is a good thing."

This daily obsession about Trump at the grassroots or miniature forum level does more for Trump than it hurts him. It helps him. It draws a line in the sand and asks - are these clownass obsessed lunatic victims just like you? Are they credible or just crazy AF? It drives people to Trump, not away. It drives people away from the lunatic fringe rather than draw them toward it.

I don’t think that your reverse psychology attempt here will work on Huck, either.

Thank you, dumbass. For again, posting about me.

[canpakes]

I don’t think that your reverse psychology attempt here will work on Huck, either.

Thank you, dumbass. For again, posting about me.

You’re welcome.

And your second attempt at reverse psychology fails, too. : )

[Whiskey]

Thank you, dumbass. For again, posting about me.

You’re welcome.

And your second attempt at reverse psychology fails, too. : )

Not only thank you for making this about me. Also, thank you for being a damned piece of crap loser troll and posting about me. Can't have a discussion around here without your idiot nonsense now, can we.

[Whiskey]

I don’t think that your reverse psychology attempt here will work on Huck, either.

Huck, do you have permission to speak for yourself?

[canpakes]

You’re welcome.

your second attempt at reverse psychology fails, too. : )

Not only thank you for making this about me. Also, thank you for being a damned piece of crap loser troll and posting about me. Can't have a discussion around here without your idiot nonsense now, can we.

How to post like Whiskey

Step 1: Call anyone who talks about Trump “clownass obsessed lunatic victims”.

Step 2: Get mad at anyone who doesn’t buy into that BS.

Live by the sword, die by the sword. But don't expect pity when your audience once again demonstrates that they see through your routine.