Rules and Moderator information

[canpakes]

Ya know what's funny about that, Lem? Do you? You don't. So I will tell you.

If it ain't true, and it is not, makes ya wonder why panny said it. Sure looks like some coordination and projection going on at chez Lem. Correct?

Marcus, wasn’t it Mikey who always used to claim that we are the same person?

And now Whiskey is ranting about it, lol.

[canpakes]

You're composing this post because you’ve been given the day’s script from Whiskey. ; )

All of this content has been discussed previously.

Did you know that the board has a function available to you that enables you to report the sorts of posts you’re complaining about? You should try it.

You can't stop lying. It is absurd. Goddamn panny. Just damned hell goddamn.

Your imagination is damned you up good.

Nope. It’s all true. The board really does have a ‘report’ feature. Would you like for me to show you where it is? : )

[Marcus]

Ya know what's funny about that, Lem? Do you? You don't. So I will tell you.

If it ain't true, and it is not, makes ya wonder why panny said it. Sure looks like some coordination and projection going on at chez Lem. Correct?

Marcus, wasn’t it Mikey who always used to claim that we are the same person?

And now Whiskey is ranting about it, lol.

That's right, I forgot about that! Too funny.

[Hound of Heaven]

...

[Hound of Heaven]

Mr. Can'tpakes. Here are two images of DrCamnPP's first two posts this morning. Both posts are crafted to elicit a response that will derail the two threads DrCamnPP posted in this morning. They lack any real substance. He isn't making any effort to engage with the subject of the thread at all, not even one sentence.

Let's see if you attempt to prove to Shades you're willing to be a non bias moderator, or are you going to use the excuse no one reported his spam so you don't need to remove his derails?

[Hound of Heaven]

[MODERATOR NOTE: After reviewing the thread in question, it appears to me that Whiskey's posts didn't violate any rule other than the one against using profanity, which he can't exactly be "dinged" for because so many others do it, too. Therefore, his ban is rescinded.]

Dr. Shades, usually I don't need a response from you on this thread, but this time I would appreciate one, but please take your time, this isn't important.

I think it is clear that I believe DrCamnPP poses the greatest challenge to the smooth operation of this board. Since Can'tpakes is not inclined to extend the same leniency to the conservatives on this board as he does to his friend DrCamnPP, may I initiate a thread to share images of DrCamnPP's posts? These include instances where he instructs others inappropriately or makes comments that Can'tpakes overlooks, despite their intent to provoke a response that could derail the ongoing discussion.

If you allow me, I will refrain from posting any images of his prior post to today, and will only share images of his post he makes from today onward, out of respect for you. I will provide an explanation for each image I share.

Would I be within the rules of the board?

[Dr. Shades]

Would I be within the rules of the board?

Yes, but please keep in mind that if any of the post you screenshot end up being moved to the Spirit Prison forum then they'll become irrelevant.

[Hound of Heaven]

Would I be within the rules of the board?

Yes, but please keep in mind that if any of the post you screenshot end up being moved to the Spirit Prison forum then they'll become irrelevant.

Dr. Shades, it seems that yesterday your moderator Can'tpakes once again exercised his moderating powers inappropriately, apparently to gain favor with his friends on the discussion board.

I intended to take a screenshot for you to view what Can'tpakes wrote, but this morning, the post in question has mysteriously vanished. Let me explain what happened yesterday. It appears that Whiskey reported a post he deemed inappropriate. Rather than addressing the matter privately, Can'tpakes chose to publicize the report, seemingly with the intention of embarrassing Whiskey. Almost immediately, Drcam capitalized on the immature situation initiated by Can'tpakes, posting a message aimed at Whiskey and attempting to undermine him for reaching out to the moderators.

Due to the fact that Can'tpakes cannot be relied upon and is prepared to exploit a board member's good intentions for his own benefit with his friends on the board, I will never report any posts to the moderator team. Why should i if theres a chance Can'tpakes will use it against me for ammunition?

Prior to yesterday, my trust in Can'tpakes was already wavering, but after he misused his moderating authority to try to humiliate Whiskey, I have completely lost confidence in Can'tpakes as a moderator. If a moderator is at their computer and sees a report come in, and their first thought is how to use this report to embarrass the person who made it, that individual should not hold the position of moderator.

[Whiskey]

Yes, but please keep in mind that if any of the post you screenshot end up being moved to the Spirit Prison forum then they'll become irrelevant.

Dr. Shades, it seems that yesterday your moderator Can'tpakes once again exercised his moderating powers inappropriately, apparently to gain favor with his friends on the discussion board.

I intended to take a screenshot for you to view what Can'tpakes wrote, but this morning, the post in question has mysteriously vanished. Let me explain what happened yesterday. It appears that Whiskey reported a post he deemed inappropriate. Rather than addressing the matter privately, Can'tpakes chose to publicize the report, seemingly with the intention of embarrassing Whiskey. Almost immediately, Drcam capitalized on the immature situation initiated by Can'tpakes, posting a message aimed at Whiskey and attempting to undermine him for reaching out to the moderators.

Due to the fact that Can'tpakes cannot be relied upon and is prepared to exploit a board member's good intentions for his own benefit with his friends on the board, I will never report any posts to the moderator team. Why should i if theres a chance Can'tpakes will use it against me for ammunition?

Prior to yesterday, my trust in Can'tpakes was already wavering, but after he misused his moderating authority to try to humiliate Whiskey, I have completely lost confidence in Can'tpakes as a moderator. If a moderator is at their computer and sees a report come in, and their first thought is how to use this report to embarrass the person who made it, that individual should not hold the position of moderator.

It is still up. Ridiculous.

Thank you, Whiskey, for finally learning how to use the report button.

Next up: the Hound account.

[canpakes]

Dr. Shades, it seems that yesterday your moderator Can'tpakes once again exercised his moderating powers inappropriately, apparently to gain favor with his friends on the discussion board.

I intended to take a screenshot for you to view what Can'tpakes wrote, but this morning, the post in question has mysteriously vanished. Let me explain what happened yesterday. It appears that Whiskey reported a post he deemed inappropriate. Rather than addressing the matter privately, Can'tpakes chose to publicize the report, seemingly with the intention of embarrassing Whiskey. Almost immediately, Drcam capitalized on the immature situation initiated by Can'tpakes, posting a message aimed at Whiskey and attempting to undermine him for reaching out to the moderators.

Due to the fact that Can'tpakes cannot be relied upon and is prepared to exploit a board member's good intentions for his own benefit with his friends on the board, I will never report any posts to the moderator team. Why should i if theres a chance Can'tpakes will use it against me for ammunition?

Prior to yesterday, my trust in Can'tpakes was already wavering, but after he misused his moderating authority to try to humiliate Whiskey, I have completely lost confidence in Can'tpakes as a moderator. If a moderator is at their computer and sees a report come in, and their first thought is how to use this report to embarrass the person who made it, that individual should not hold the position of moderator.

It is still up. Ridiculous.

Thank you, Whiskey, for finally learning how to use the report button.

Next up: the Hound account.

You reported a post from someone else that you can’t erase, then reported it again, but have reposted the link to the post you don’t like here, for public viewing?

Did you do this for your proxy Hound account, which claims that the post ‘vanished’? Can’t y’all get your story straight? : D

And why would using the report feature be humiliating to you?