Trump's DOJ: There Is No Epstein List
- Equality
- Priest
- Posts: 297
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 4:41 pm
Re: Trump's DOJ: There Is No Epstein List
I am gratified to see that Whiskey is passionately arguing against the proposition that the nazification of the current GOP is a result of people feeling shamed into it by liberals calling MAGA folks racist or fascist and that it is, rather, a result of the GOP itself making itself a warm and inviting organization for such people.
"Praise be to Allah"--President Donald J. Trump
-
Whiskey
- God
- Posts: 1578
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2025 8:13 pm
Re: Trump's DOJ: There Is No Epstein List
E man. You are not as damned stupid as the "F"s who say stupid crap like that. Why do you do it?Equality wrote: ↑Sun Dec 21, 2025 3:05 pmI am gratified to see that Whiskey is passionately arguing against the proposition that the nazification of the current GOP is a result of people feeling shamed into it by liberals calling MAGA folks racist or fascist and that it is, rather, a result of the GOP itself making itself a warm and inviting organization for such people.
Ban Whiskey permanently if that's the only way.
— Gadianton
It is the only way.
— Whiskey
— Gadianton
It is the only way.
— Whiskey
- canpakes
- God
- Posts: 10423
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:25 am
Re: Trump's DOJ: There Is No Epstein List
Are they done blaming Obama, yet? I’ve heard so many times how he was our most divisive president because of something mumble something.Equality wrote: ↑Sun Dec 21, 2025 3:05 pmI am gratified to see that Whiskey is passionately arguing against the proposition that the nazification of the current GOP is a result of people feeling shamed into it by liberals calling MAGA folks racist or fascist and that it is, rather, a result of the GOP itself making itself a warm and inviting organization for such people.
- Equality
- Priest
- Posts: 297
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 4:41 pm
Re: Trump's DOJ: There Is No Epstein List
Oh, so you DO think the original meme was essentially correct. You owe canpakes an apology it seems.Whiskey wrote: ↑Sun Dec 21, 2025 3:41 pmE man. You are not as damned stupid as the "F"s who say stupid crap like that. Why do you do it?Equality wrote: ↑Sun Dec 21, 2025 3:05 pmI am gratified to see that Whiskey is passionately arguing against the proposition that the nazification of the current GOP is a result of people feeling shamed into it by liberals calling MAGA folks racist or fascist and that it is, rather, a result of the GOP itself making itself a warm and inviting organization for such people.
"Praise be to Allah"--President Donald J. Trump
-
Whiskey
- God
- Posts: 1578
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2025 8:13 pm
Re: Trump's DOJ: There Is No Epstein List
Again, you are not as screwed up and retarded as panny, but you want his approval. “F” is that all about? You want to lie and make crap up to be like him? Mmmmmkay. Whatever man.
Ban Whiskey permanently if that's the only way.
— Gadianton
It is the only way.
— Whiskey
— Gadianton
It is the only way.
— Whiskey
- canpakes
- God
- Posts: 10423
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:25 am
Re: Trump's DOJ: There Is No Epstein List

.
Brought to you by The Most Transparent Administration in History.
- Doctor CamNC4Me
- God
- Posts: 10773
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:04 am
Re: Trump's DOJ: There Is No Epstein List
Speaking of screwed up and retarded, like the author here of ‘Be Less Dickish’:

wE nEgOtIaTe wItH bOmBs
- Doctor Steuss
- God
- Posts: 2530
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 8:48 pm
Re: Trump's DOJ: There Is No Epstein List
With the new release having a US Attorney emailing to giving the heads-up that Trump is in the flight logs way more than previously thought or disclosed (one of which was with just him, Epstein, and two victims) are any of the members of MAGA (Molesting And Grooming Adolescents) finally ready to drop ship, or nah? Incidentally, it's pretty wild that the United States Attorney's name who was acting to protect Trump while they were ready to prosecute Maxwell, is redacted. How is a guy who was actively helping to shield a predator a "victim" needing their name redacted?
Trump isn't in the Epstein files. Epstein is in the Trump files. Time to get Trump's flight logs to see how many times Epstein and Clinton were on his jet.
Also, how about the 100+ pages of Grand Jury fun that a judge green-lighted, which is redacted in its entirety? Totally not sus.
Trump isn't in the Epstein files. Epstein is in the Trump files. Time to get Trump's flight logs to see how many times Epstein and Clinton were on his jet.
Also, how about the 100+ pages of Grand Jury fun that a judge green-lighted, which is redacted in its entirety? Totally not sus.
- Equality
- Priest
- Posts: 297
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2020 4:41 pm
Re: Trump's DOJ: There Is No Epstein List
They're all just plugging their ears and chanting "hare hare hoax hare hare hoax."Doctor Steuss wrote: ↑Tue Dec 23, 2025 6:07 pmWith the new release having a US Attorney emailing to giving the heads-up that Trump is in the flight logs way more than previously thought or disclosed (one of which was with just him, Epstein, and two victims) are any of the members of MAGA (Molesting And Grooming Adolescents) finally ready to drop ship, or nah? Incidentally, it's pretty wild that the United States Attorney's name who was acting to protect Trump while they were ready to prosecute Maxwell, is redacted. How is a guy who was actively helping to shield a predator a "victim" needing their name redacted?
Trump isn't in the Epstein files. Epstein is in the Trump files. Time to get Trump's flight logs to see how many times Epstein and Clinton were on his jet.
Also, how about the 100+ pages of Grand Jury fun that a judge green-lighted, which is redacted in its entirety? Totally not sus.
They can't answer why, if it's a "hoax," there would be any need for the DOJ to make such heavy-handed redactions in blatant disregard for the law.
Some may take a stab at that one and say, half-heartedly, that the redactions must be to protect the "investigation" into Clinton. But if that were the case, then it would only be Clinton stuff that was redacted, and they released a bunch of Clinton stuff, so that dog won't hunt. And, of course, that's also a two-edged sword. If the redactions of non-CSA, non-victim materials are only made to protect open investigations, and Trump-related stuff is heavily redacted (as we know it is), then are they saying Trump is under investigation by his own DOJ? Of course not.
Which brings us back to the obvious and sole conclusion: they are illegally redacting nearly every mention of Trump (of which we know there are thousands) in order to cover up the crimes he committed with his best friend Jeff Epstein.
Because the MAGA cult members have nothing, they will either claim (like Whiskey) that they "don't give an eff" about Epstein and the Epstein files or they will go back to chanting "hare hare hoax hare hare hoax" and push the cog dis deep down inside.
"Praise be to Allah"--President Donald J. Trump
-
Whiskey
- God
- Posts: 1578
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2025 8:13 pm
Re: Trump's DOJ: There Is No Epstein List
ZFTG was the exact term.Equality wrote: ↑Tue Dec 23, 2025 6:56 pmThey're all just plugging their ears and chanting "hare hare hoax hare hare hoax."Doctor Steuss wrote: ↑Tue Dec 23, 2025 6:07 pmWith the new release having a US Attorney emailing to giving the heads-up that Trump is in the flight logs way more than previously thought or disclosed (one of which was with just him, Epstein, and two victims) are any of the members of MAGA (Molesting And Grooming Adolescents) finally ready to drop ship, or nah? Incidentally, it's pretty wild that the United States Attorney's name who was acting to protect Trump while they were ready to prosecute Maxwell, is redacted. How is a guy who was actively helping to shield a predator a "victim" needing their name redacted?
Trump isn't in the Epstein files. Epstein is in the Trump files. Time to get Trump's flight logs to see how many times Epstein and Clinton were on his jet.
Also, how about the 100+ pages of Grand Jury fun that a judge green-lighted, which is redacted in its entirety? Totally not sus.
They can't answer why, if it's a "hoax," there would be any need for the DOJ to make such heavy-handed redactions in blatant disregard for the law.
Some may take a stab at that one and say, half-heartedly, that the redactions must be to protect the "investigation" into Clinton. But if that were the case, then it would only be Clinton stuff that was redacted, and they released a bunch of Clinton stuff, so that dog won't hunt. And, of course, that's also a two-edged sword. If the redactions of non-CSA, non-victim materials are only made to protect open investigations, and Trump-related stuff is heavily redacted (as we know it is), then are they saying Trump is under investigation by his own DOJ? Of course not.
Which brings us back to the obvious and sole conclusion: they are illegally redacting nearly every mention of Trump (of which we know there are thousands) in order to cover up the crimes he committed with his best friend Jeff Epstein.
Because the MAGA cult members have nothing, they will either claim (like Whiskey) that they "don't give an eff" about Epstein and the Epstein files or they will go back to chanting "hare hare hoax hare hare hoax" and push the cog dis deep down inside.
You're a real piece of crap when you want to be. Add that there are even fewer "F"s than zero "F"s to give for just about anything for which you have all the "F"s to give. See, that was the point all along. The more you care and make crap up, the fewer care "F"s the normal folks have. Not that silly self-jerking crap you were carrying on about with your memey cartoon.
Ban Whiskey permanently if that's the only way.
— Gadianton
It is the only way.
— Whiskey
— Gadianton
It is the only way.
— Whiskey