Deraliment from "Trump's Response To A Factory Worker Who Called for Epstein Transparency"

[canpakes]

Ajax stop posting off topic matter.

But her emails.

:: runs and hides behind large object ::

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

Ajax stop posting off topic matter.

But her emails.

:: runs and hides behind large object ::

“The worst enemy of a poor person is another poor person who thinks he is rich and who defends those who make them poor.”

— Pepe Mujica

[ajax18]

But her emails.

:: runs and hides behind large object ::

“The worst enemy of a poor person is another poor person who thinks he is rich and who defends those who make them poor.”

— Pepe Mujica

Are you referring to me falsely thinking that I am rich? I thought you believed that I was rich and had a great life but was not able to appreciate what I had? Which is it? Am I rich or am I poor according to you?

And there was nothing off topic about my post. Nobody on either side of the aisle gives a rip about the Epstein files outside of using these files to hurt the opposition party. Regardless of who gets exposed, it's not going to change anyone's vote, as I pointed out in reference to WJC getting exposed yet again. Votes are brought and sold based on who gets taxed and who collects.

[Chap]

Nobody on either side of the aisle gives a rip about the Epstein files outside of using these files to hurt the opposition party.

Erm, I take leave to think that is not true.

It is certainly true that there appear to be a considerable number of well-known people who, to a greater and lesser degree, were aware of or even took some part in the abuse of young women carried out by Epstein with the help of his facilitator, Maxwell. If the files are (as the law demands) made public in full, subject only to those redactions needed to protect the identity of victims, then some of those people will have good reason to feel deeply embarrassed, or even, in some cases, fear going to jail.

It is extremely unlikely that there are no members of Congress who have the normal healthy human reaction of shock and disgust on learning of this material, and who simply want to see wrongdoing punished. Even Ajax, I suggest, shares those feelings. So is he so morally superior to everybody in both houses of Congress? I doubt it.

[Some Schmo]

Nobody on either side of the aisle gives a rip about the Epstein files outside of using these files to hurt the opposition party.

Erm, I take leave to think that is not true.

Not only is it not true, it's pure projection. ajax doesn't give a crap about the pedophilia, because if he did, he perceives it threaten his Nazi movement. So he tells himself that nobody cares about it, because it's easy for him not to care about it.

He's a typical modern Christian. Being a piece of crap is all part of it.

[Some Schmo]

This evil will turn on you. It’s a matter of time.

It's already turned on everyone, but MAGAtes' assholes are too numb to feel themselves getting reamed daily. If they do feel it, their moaning with pleasure.

Were you raped mum?

Well, at first...

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

“The worst enemy of a poor person is another poor person who thinks he is rich and who defends those who make them poor.”

— Pepe Mujica

Are you referring to me falsely thinking that I am rich?

Read the quote again. I think you’re relatively poor.

Also, holy crap. You’re saying you don’t care about holding people to account for damned kids. Do you support releasing all the files?

[ajax18]

Nobody on either side of the aisle gives a rip about the Epstein files outside of using these files to hurt the opposition party.

Erm, I take leave to think that is not true.

It is certainly true that there appear to be a considerable number of well-known people who, to a greater and lesser degree, were aware of or even took some part in the abuse of young women carried out by Epstein with the help of his facilitator, Maxwell. If the files are (as the law demands) made public in full, subject only to those redactions needed to protect the identity of victims, then some of those people will have good reason to feel deeply embarrassed, or even, in some cases, fear going to jail.

It is extremely unlikely that there are no members of Congress who have the normal healthy human reaction of shock and disgust on learning of this material, and who simply want to see wrongdoing punished. Even Ajax, I suggest, shares those feelings. So is he so morally superior to everybody in both houses of Congress? I doubt it.

One thing for sure is that Democrats don't care one bit that Bill Clinton's name came up in the Epstein files. They don't care that he lied about the affair with Monica Lewinsky under oath and committed perjury. The economy was good under Bill and that's all that mattered to any of them. Now they want to call Republicans immoral because we don't care about Donald Trump's sex life much when we consider everything else he's achieved for us.

[Dr. Sunstoned]

One thing for sure is that Democrats don't care one bit that Bill Clinton's name came up in the Epstein files. They don't care that he lied about the affair with Monica Lewinsky under oath and committed perjury. The economy was good under Bill and that's all that mattered to any of them. Now they want to call Republicans immoral because we don't care about Donald Trump's sex life much when we consider everything else he's achieved for us.

Bill Clinton was impeached and went to trial. I was not happy with the final verdict, but at least members of Congress on both sides of the aisle had the guts and morals to try to do the right thing. Fast forward to Trump's first term. Articles of impeachment were brought twice, and bothtimes, Republican moral less cowardly sycophants refused to prosecute or even investigate.

Trump and MAGA are on the wrong side of history. They will be lumped in with Nixon's corruption and Andrew Johnson's racism. Ajax, ten years from now, you will be lying to your grandkids about who you supported and why.

[Chap]

Now they want to call Republicans immoral because we don't care about Donald Trump's sex life much when we consider everything else he's achieved for us.

I am absolutely NOT interested in whatever it is we might call 'President Trump's sex life'. The very idea of having to think about it in any detail repels me.

But if the evidence in the Epstein files suggests plausibly that Trump has, in the course of what was apparently a close acquaintance with Epstein, broken the law by having sexual contact with a trafficked under-age girl or girls, it would be very proper for him to be put under criminal investigation, and if convicted suitably punished.

I take it you would agree, as the law-abiding father of a daughter, that under those circumstances that would be the proper moral and legal thing to happen, and that you would wish it to take place?

Yes, I know, Bill Clinton and so on. Prosecute anybody that the evidence points to. But It is Trump I am asking about here, as you well know. So please answer the question I have asked.