Sure. But we have no law that says that no immigration at all is allowed, or that no asylum cases can be considered, simply because Donald Trump doesn’t want to offend the MAGA base. At the moment, USCIS has placed a hold on all asylum cases until it ‘completes a comprehensive review’ of the process, which is a way of just killing off the process indefinitely. That’s not the spirit of the law.
I couldn't disagree more. The spirit of political asylum laws is due to safety concerns, i.e. our Afghan allies who would have been executed by the Taliban. Asylum laws do not exist to provide unlimited and uninvited immigration in response to the fact that an individual can potentially make more money and attain a better standard of living if he were allowed to immigrate to the US. What Biden did over the past four years was an abuse of our asylum laws and the America people agreed, albeit by a narrow majority.
It would appear - as mentioned previously - that the only exception to this may be for White Afrikaners, which cannot be rationally explained.
And when the Confederates saw Jackson standing fearless like a stonewall, the army of Northern Virginia took courage and drove the federal army off their land.
and democracy does not generally give licence to discriminate based on weird subjective claims.
Rule by the people means that questions like this are decided at the ballot box. I may not like it, but "Killing the boar," is quite popular in South Africa and in this case the white genocide and property redistribution that is happening there is an example of democratic rule by the people.
And when the Confederates saw Jackson standing fearless like a stonewall, the army of Northern Virginia took courage and drove the federal army off their land.
"Killing the boar," is quite popular in South Africa
I don't think that animal is much hunted in SA.
Oh, you meant BOER - that is the word for 'farmer' in Afrikaans, the version of Dutch spoken by the settlers from the Low Countries who colonised parts of the southern tip of Africa from the 17th century onwards. Their descendants are distinguished from the rest of the white population in SA, many of whom are of English origin. In the 19th century, the Boer population tried to escape from British control, in part because they hated the British abolition of slavery in 1833.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
Mayan Elephant:
Not only have I denounced the Big Lie, I have denounced the Big lie big lie.
Sure. But we have no law that says that no immigration at all is allowed, or that no asylum cases can be considered, simply because Donald Trump doesn’t want to offend the MAGA base. At the moment, USCIS has placed a hold on all asylum cases until it ‘completes a comprehensive review’ of the process, which is a way of just killing off the process indefinitely. That’s not the spirit of the law.
I couldn't disagree more. The spirit of political asylum laws is due to safety concerns, i.e. our Afghan allies who would have been executed by the Taliban.
Well, the Trump Administration ended Temporary Protected Status for them early last year, too. So much for that.
Asylum laws do not exist to provide unlimited and uninvited immigration in response to the fact that an individual can potentially make more money and attain a better standard of living if he were allowed to immigrate to the US.
Maybe not asylum in particular, but the idea that “an individual can potentially make more money and attain a better standard of living if he were allowed to immigrate to the US” is exactly the reason for immigration in general. It’s why your own relatives came here. This reasoning is suddenly invalid to you? With that and asylum now off the table, what are the acceptable reasons, in your view, for immigrants to come to America?
I couldn't disagree more. The spirit of political asylum laws is due to safety concerns, i.e. our Afghan allies who would have been executed by the Taliban.
Well, the Trump Administration ended Temporary Protected Status for them early last year, too. So much for that.
Asylum laws do not exist to provide unlimited and uninvited immigration in response to the fact that an individual can potentially make more money and attain a better standard of living if he were allowed to immigrate to the US.
Maybe not asylum in particular, but the idea that “an individual can potentially make more money and attain a better standard of living if he were allowed to immigrate to the US” is exactly the reason for immigration in general. It’s why your own relatives came here. This reasoning is suddenly invalid to you? With that and asylum now off the table, what are the acceptable reasons, in your view, for immigrants to come to America?
It's time to stop expecting critical thinking skills from people who aren't smart enough to realize that "I love the poorly educated" was not a compliment.
"Killing the boar," is quite popular in South Africa
I don't think that animal is much hunted in SA.
Oh, you meant BOER - that is the word for 'farmer' in Afrikaans, the version of Dutch spoken by the settlers from the Low Countries who colonised parts of the southern tip of Africa from the 17th century onwards.
The statement as written is more accurate than the notion that there’s an epidemic of ‘white farmer killings’ in SA.
Warthogs and bush pigs might be hunted there. White farmers, not quite so much. It makes for good propaganda, though.
A detailed list of Trump's accomplishments in year 1
Trump’s Tariffs Deliver on Many Fronts
Most-Favored-Nations Deals
The “Trump Economic Boom” Is Underway
Securing the Border and Mass Deportations
Peace Through Strength: Eight Conflicts or Wars De-Escalated or Settled
One Big Beautiful Bill Act
Protecting Youth and Women from Trans Ideology
Instituting the Make America Healthy Again Agenda
Do you even have any kind of mild interest in truth? This is such malarky and campaign style BS, even 5th graders can see the "Trumped" up fake news in this. Goddam, you mean you are incapable of doing just 5 minutes of research to verify what you say? It took me a mere 5 minutes to see how absolutely misleading and outright wrong this information is. Have you no personal pride? Did your mommy spank you too hard in your youth and make you mad or knock your brains out of you? I actually feel sorry you have such low self esteem and are more comfortable being shameless in spreading lies. You do know the category that fits in the "selfish and shameless" which most closely aligns with your post here? It's from a book I am reading by two authors, David Coates and Corey Kilpack, "Be Less Dickish", no copyright or valid printer for this, in other words, self-published, but it does note the category you could be put into is that of "As*hole." (p. 52). I see no effort on your part to dissuade anyone that it fits you like a glove on a hand.
...but it does note the category you could be put into is that of "As*hole." (p. 52). I see no effort on your part to dissuade anyone that it fits you like a glove on a hand.
Asshole is the archetype of the Jesus ajax worships. He is dumb enough to think he's "righteous."
Religion is for people whose existential fear is greater than their common sense. It's also the favored cover for hypocrites.
Trump is asked whether Renee Good's actions warranted deadly force and he says "at a very minimum she was very disrespectful to law enforcement." Being disrespectful is not a f*cking crime and it doesn't warrant being shot in the face three times, and then not being allowed to be helped while she was still alive. In David Coates and Corey Kilpack's book "Be Less Dickless," this would categorize Trump as all four categories they elaborate on, i.e. As*hole, Douchebag, Pussy, and Dick, and I would add accessory to murder.
