Trump's DOJ: There Is No Epstein List

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
Post Reply
Whiskey
God
Posts: 1578
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2025 8:13 pm

Re: Trump's DOJ: There Is No Epstein List

Post by Whiskey »

Doctor Steuss wrote:
Fri Dec 26, 2025 8:16 pm
Whiskey wrote:
Fri Dec 26, 2025 7:12 pm
Bubba said that? That's fun. So now what?
His people issued a statement calling for everything to be released, unredacted. To me, the tone is pretty much "you can either stop doing the selective redacting to target me, and protect yourselves, or you can make it so we all go down together." I doubt many Democrats worship at the altar of Clinton like the Republican Trump cult, so I can't imagine he's doing it to gaslight loyalists with "see, I have nothing to hide."

My guess is absolutely nothing will come of this, other than a few additional high-power Democrats will either be forced from boards or other leadership positions (like Larry Summers), but no one will ultimately be charged or go to prison. I doubt there will be any political fallout amongst Republicans. They've already had years of practice of making peace with supporting sexual predation of children and women.

A third of American voters already don't care if someone is a rapist who walks in on children getting dressed and is supported by the American Nazi Party. No amount of "dirt" can sway that type of voter.
Maybe. That's a metric crap ton of conflation. Takes a lot of granted credibility to one side but not the other and judgment of one side but not the other.

The apathy is not about the crime or crimes. It's about you. Don't take that personally. Consider it a generic you.
Ban Whiskey permanently if that's the only way.
— Gadianton

It is the only way.
— Whiskey
Whiskey
God
Posts: 1578
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2025 8:13 pm

Re: Trump's DOJ: There Is No Epstein List

Post by Whiskey »

Doctor Steuss wrote:
Fri Dec 26, 2025 8:16 pm
A third of American voters already don't care if someone is a rapist who walks in on children getting dressed and is supported by the American Nazi Party. No amount of "dirt" can sway that type of voter.
There is not enough evidence to support this claim.

In 2011, the "F"s given for WMD was less than in 2002. "F"s given were near zero. Americans were still patriotic but when it came to WMD, yawn whatever.

A third of Americans, likely more, couldn't have fewer "F"s to give about the Epstein files or Some Schmo's opinion about the files or anything else. Don't damned care what the left hive or right hive thinks. “F” ever.
Ban Whiskey permanently if that's the only way.
— Gadianton

It is the only way.
— Whiskey
User avatar
canpakes
God
Posts: 10423
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:25 am

Re: Trump's DOJ: There Is No Epstein List

Post by canpakes »

Doctor Steuss wrote:
Fri Dec 26, 2025 8:16 pm
His people issued a statement calling for everything to be released, unredacted. To me, the tone is pretty much "you can either stop doing the selective redacting to target me, and protect yourselves, or you can make it so we all go down together."
That they did. Are you referring to the one posted upstream (viewtopic.php?p=2917675#p2917675) or has there been more from the Clinton camp since that one?
User avatar
Doctor Steuss
God
Posts: 2530
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 8:48 pm

Re: Trump's DOJ: There Is No Epstein List

Post by Doctor Steuss »

Whiskey wrote:
Fri Dec 26, 2025 8:38 pm
Doctor Steuss wrote:
Fri Dec 26, 2025 8:16 pm
A third of American voters already don't care if someone is a rapist who walks in on children getting dressed and is supported by the American Nazi Party. No amount of "dirt" can sway that type of voter.
There is not enough evidence to support this claim.
Which claim?

If a unanimous jury verdict based partially on (and this is from memory) 3 contemporaneous corroborating witnesses, Trump's own recorded words bragging about doing the exact thing that the jury found him liable for, and the recorded statement (where he knew he was being recorded) bragging about walking in on children getting dressed (not to mention the statements by parents and children confirming that Trump did exactly what Trump claimed to have done), and the words of the head of the American Nazi Party aren't "enough evidence," then what on earth would be?

Or are you saying there's not enough evidence to support the claim that there's no amount of "dirt" that could sway a three-times-Trumper? Ehhh... maybe. I can only imagine how much more it would take at this point though. The only time his cult seemed to somewhat swerve away from undying loyalty was when he temporarily made some pro-vax statements.
User avatar
Doctor Steuss
God
Posts: 2530
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 8:48 pm

Re: Trump's DOJ: There Is No Epstein List

Post by Doctor Steuss »

canpakes wrote:
Fri Dec 26, 2025 8:52 pm
Doctor Steuss wrote:
Fri Dec 26, 2025 8:16 pm
His people issued a statement calling for everything to be released, unredacted. To me, the tone is pretty much "you can either stop doing the selective redacting to target me, and protect yourselves, or you can make it so we all go down together."
That they did. Are you referring to the one posted upstream (viewtopic.php?p=2917675#p2917675) or has there been more from the Clinton camp since that one?
Yeppers, that's the one.
Whiskey
God
Posts: 1578
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2025 8:13 pm

Re: Trump's DOJ: There Is No Epstein List

Post by Whiskey »

Doctor Steuss wrote:
Fri Dec 26, 2025 10:24 pm
Whiskey wrote:
Fri Dec 26, 2025 8:38 pm
There is not enough evidence to support this claim.
Which claim?

If a unanimous jury verdict based partially on (and this is from memory) 3 contemporaneous corroborating witnesses, Trump's own recorded words bragging about doing the exact thing that the jury found him liable for, and the recorded statement (where he knew he was being recorded) bragging about walking in on children getting dressed (not to mention the statements by parents and children confirming that Trump did exactly what Trump claimed to have done), and the words of the head of the American Nazi Party aren't "enough evidence," then what on earth would be?

Or are you saying there's not enough evidence to support the claim that there's no amount of "dirt" that could sway a three-times-Trumper? Ehhh... maybe. I can only imagine how much more it would take at this point though. The only time his cult seemed to somewhat swerve away from undying loyalty was when he temporarily made some pro-vax statements.
Nazis were part of tbat too? Yeah. ZFTG.
They do not care. Credibility is burnt. Wolf wolf wolf. They don't care.
Ban Whiskey permanently if that's the only way.
— Gadianton

It is the only way.
— Whiskey
User avatar
canpakes
God
Posts: 10423
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:25 am

Re: Trump's DOJ: There Is No Epstein List

Post by canpakes »

Trump DOJ Blasts Epstein Files as ‘Clearly Fake’

By Charlotte Bennett
January 9, 2026 2:06 AM


US Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche addressed growing speculation surrounding the release of Jeffrey Epstein–related documents, saying some materials disclosed by the government are “fake or false” but were released because the Epstein Files Transparency Act requires the Department of Justice (DOJ) to produce every document in its possession.

Blanche made the remarks in response to online claims and viral content tied to the latest tranche of files.

He said, “There has been lots of sensationalism and even outright lies these past few days about the ‘Epstein Files.’ But let’s separate fact from fiction. Document production is just that. We produce documents, and sometimes this can result in releasing fake or false documents because they simply are in our possession because the law requires this.”

He cited specific examples, including what he called the “so‑called Epstein Nassar letter,” which he said was “clearly FAKE — wrong handwriting, wrong return address and postmarked three days after Epstein died.” Blanche also referenced “fake videos of Epstein in his cell” and “photos with no explanation,” adding that “sensational tales and lies by random people… are not reality.”

Reason behind the dispute

The comments came as the Justice Department faced scrutiny over its handling of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which mandates the release of nearly all federal records tied to Epstein’s criminal cases and related investigations.

DOJ leadership informed a federal judge that more than 99 percent of the files remain unreleased, with over two million documents still under review. The department has cited victim privacy concerns and ongoing investigative interests as reasons for the delay.

The FBI and the U.S. District Attorney’s Office identified more than one million additional documents potentially linked to Epstein, extending the disclosure timeline beyond the statutory deadline. Justice Department teams are reviewing about 5.2 million pages, with roughly 400 employees assisting in the process.

Reactions from lawmakers and officials

Rep. Thomas Massie wrote on X that Trump blamed him for the transparency law while defending those with former ties to Epstein.

He claimed, “Trump is blaming me for a bill he eventually signed, while defending his banker friends, Bill Clinton, and ‘innocent’ visitors to island. Meanwhile Bondi is working fervently to redact, omit and delete Epstein files she is legally required to release under our bill.”

Attorney General Pam Bondi issued her own statement on X, reaffirming that the department would pursue charges against anyone involved in the trafficking or exploitation of Epstein’s victims.

She said, “The Department of Justice previously stated we will bring charges against anyone involved in the trafficking and exploitation of Jeffrey Epstein’s victims. We reaffirm this commitment, and ask any victim to please come forward with any information pertaining to any individuals who engaged in illicit activity at their expense.

We have met with many victims and victims groups, and will continue to do so if more reach out. Please contact myself, DAG Blanche, or the FBI and we will investigate immediately. We believe in the equal standard of justice in this country and will ensure that Justice is served.”

Lawmakers from both parties noted they will continue oversight efforts to ensure full compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

https://thedailyadda.com/2026/01/09/tru ... arly-fake/
User avatar
Doctor CamNC4Me
God
Posts: 10773
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:04 am

Re: Trump's DOJ: There Is No Epstein List

Post by Doctor CamNC4Me »

Such BS:

Image
wE nEgOtIaTe wItH bOmBs
User avatar
Jersey Girl
God
Posts: 9200
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:51 am
Location: In my head

Re: Trump's DOJ: There Is No Epstein List

Post by Jersey Girl »

That lying cowardly sack of a vindictive snake is at it again. He wanted the files redacted, held back the full release for how long? But the DOJ put every damn thing about the victims to the world.

Please take 12 minutes of your time to watch this if only as an act of solidarity with the victims.

Lawrence: Trump Justice Department has Epstein survivors begging 'delete my name!'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07MCl6X6Vx4

You know when I was a child I recall hearing my truck driver father use the phrase "sonofabitchbastard" and he said it just like that. Just thought I'd share that little memory. No one knows why...
LIGHT HAS A NAME

We only get stronger when we are lifting something that is heavier than what we are used to. ~ KF

Slava Ukraini!
User avatar
Jersey Girl
God
Posts: 9200
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 3:51 am
Location: In my head

Re: Trump's DOJ: There Is No Epstein List

Post by Jersey Girl »

This Lauren Boebert? This is Lauren Boebert and she's making sense? :o

Boebert short.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/yrGRk3QGEH4
LIGHT HAS A NAME

We only get stronger when we are lifting something that is heavier than what we are used to. ~ KF

Slava Ukraini!
Post Reply