Random Epstein Files Thoughts

[Some Schmo]

We know beyond of a shadow of a doubt that ajax supports pedophilia, so all his BS about Jesus and his empty faith is as valuable as a bucket of slugs.

He's a another piece of crap hypocrite and liar. But of course, we've known that for years now.

[Dr Exiled]

Vendetta cases are fairly easy to spot: they're the ones that the government has a hard time getting a grand jury or magistrate to go along with or silly cases resulting in not guilty verdicts:

Examples:

James Comey (indictment based on misrepresentations to grand jury)
Leticia James (multiple no bills returned by grand jury)
Jerome Powell
Lisa Cook
John Bolton
Mark Kelly & five congress members (no bill returned by grand jury)
Adam Schiff
Eric Swalwell
Jack Smith
Miles Taylor
Christopher Krebs
Joe Biden
Barak Obama
Don Lemon (first magistrate denied -- grand jury indicted

We could also add not guilty verdicts

Sean Dunn (sandwich guy)
Sidney Reid (accused of pushing federal agent)

Not Vendetta Cases:

Federal Election interference (Trump indicted)
Georgia Election interference (Trump indicted)
Stealing Documents (Trump indicted)
New York financial fraud (Trump indicted and convicted)

I'm sorry, but you're never going to convince me that the left didn't pursue these cases against Trump in hopes of keeping him from running for reelection. If there were something about Trump in the Epstein files, Merrick Garland would have used it to get Trump before he ever took office, period!

Naw, it's a conspiracy of silence. Both parties don't want their beloved donors and puppet politicians to be implicated in the Epstein case. Pontificating aside, team narratives aside, we should look at this as it really is .... the elites doing whatever they want, flaunting the law, and using their puppets to cover up what really happened. This has been festering since Bush II. Trump, Biden, Obama, all of them, have covered for this pedo and his elite clients. Time for a change.

We condemn how Cojcolds covers up their pedo sins and so we should condemn all those elites involved in this BS. Bondi, Patel, Trump, and the prior admins should be held to account for the nonsense. When will we get justice?

[Gunnar]

I'm sorry, but you're never going to convince me that the left didn't pursue these cases against Trump in hopes of keeping him from running for reelection. If there were something about Trump in the Epstein files, Merrick Garland would have used it to get Trump before he ever took office, period!

Considering the well documented evidence of Trump's history of bigotry, highly questionable business practices, tax fraud and other scams (like Trump university), cheating his contractors and business associates and creditors, sexual harassment and abuse of women, pathological lying, his felony convictions, his association with pedophiles like Jeffrey Epstein, etc., there is nothing surprising, sinister or scandalous about the fact that reasonable people whether on the left or otherwise would try mightily to keep him from running for reelection! Prosecution and indictments against Trump and many of his loyal sycophants and appointees were motivated and proceeded by credible evidence of unlawful, unconstitutional activities and practices. On the other hand (as Trump and, like Representative Comer and others have admitted), investigation of their Democrat opponents is motivated by vengeance and the hope of finding any evidence that can be used as a pretext to legally indict and prosecuted them. Comer has even admitted that they are pursuing these investigations and hearings, not because they have already found unequivocal evidence of wrongdoing, but because they desperately hope to find some!

ETA: If, in fact, they do find unequivocal evidence of unlawful activity on the part of Democrat politicians, I have no objection to them being prosecuted just like Guilty Republican politicians. Whether or not anyone is indicted or prosecuted for actual criminal acts should never be a partisan issue!

[Gunnar]

Naw, it's a conspiracy of silence. Both parties don't want their beloved donors and puppet politicians to be implicated in the Epstein case. Pontificating aside, team narratives aside, we should look at this as it really is .... the elites doing whatever they want, flaunting the law, and using their puppets to cover up what really happened. This has been festering since Bush II. Trump, Biden, Obama, all of them, have covered for this pedo and his elite clients. Time for a change.

We condemn how Cojcolds covers up their pedo sins and so we should condemn all those elites involved in this BS. Bondi, Patel, Trump, and the prior admins should be held to account for the nonsense. When will we get justice?

Agreed!

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

Naw, it's a conspiracy of silence. Both parties don't want their beloved donors and puppet politicians to be implicated in the Epstein case. Pontificating aside, team narratives aside, we should look at this as it really is .... the elites doing whatever they want, flaunting the law, and using their puppets to cover up what really happened. This has been festering since Bush II. Trump, Biden, Obama, all of them, have covered for this pedo and his elite clients. Time for a change.

We condemn how Cojcolds covers up their pedo sins and so we should condemn all those elites involved in this BS. Bondi, Patel, Trump, and the prior admins should be held to account for the nonsense. When will we get justice?

Agreed!

Do Democrats not want their beloved donors and puppet politicians to be implicated in the Epstein case? Because I want them all to be outed and charged. Is this just an attempt at both-sidesism?

Dr. Exiled:

[ajax18]

there is nothing surprising, sinister or scandalous about the fact that reasonable people whether on the left or otherwise would try mightily to keep him from running for reelection!

So you only believe in democracy when the majority agrees with you? When the majority disagrees with you, that's no longer democracy, it's an authoritarian dictatorship, right? When your party is in the majority, you must preserve democracy at all costs. But when your party finds themselves in the minority, you must interfere in any and every way necessary to disenfranchise voters who don't make what you believe to be the right choice. Whether that's ballot harvesting, bankrupting their candidate and party with lawfare, denying 1st amendment rights to your political opponents, arresting and imprisoning anyone associated with the opposition campaign, or even killing them i.e. Charlie Kirk, Donald Trump assasination attempts, etc. I think we're starting to understand what the left means when they want to "save democracy."

Which president does this quote belong to?

"You can't love your country only when you win?"

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

Notice how Xanax, that lying son of a bitch, edits the quote to make it the worst possible interpretation of Gunnar’s words possible.

and other scams (like Trump university), cheating his contractors and business associates and creditors, sexual harassment and abuse of women, pathological lying, his felony convictions, his association with pedophiles like Jeffrey Epstein, etc., there is nothing surprising, sinister or scandalous about the fact that reasonable people whether on the left or otherwise would try mightily to keep him from running for reelection! Prosecution and indictments against Trump and many of his loyal sycophants and appointees were motivated and proceeded by credible evidence of unlawful, unconstitutional activities and practices. On the other hand (as Trump and, like Representative Comer and others have admitted), investigation of their Democrat opponents is motivated by vengeance and the hope of finding any evidence that can be used as a pretext to legally indict and prosecuted them. Comer has even admitted that they are pursuing these investigations and hearings, not because they have already found unequivocal evidence of wrongdoing, but because they desperately hope to find some!

ETA: If, in fact, they do find unequivocal evidence of unlawful activity on the part of Democrat politicians, I have no objection to them being prosecuted just like Guilty Republican politicians. Whether or not anyone is indicted or prosecuted for actual criminal acts should never be a partisan issue!

Communicating with Xanax is a complete waste of time.

[canpakes]

We know beyond of a shadow of a doubt that ajax supports pedophilia, so all his BS about Jesus and his empty faith is as valuable as a bucket of slugs.

My opinion is that the direct connection you’re stating here is premature. There may be some surefire evidence still to emerge that Trump has directly engaged in this but until that time there’s still a difference between ‘supports pedophilia’ merely for being a Trump supporter, and supporting pedophilia itself. I’m interpreting the difference to be (1) attempting to protect one’s ego after having linked their identity to Trump versus (2) actually engaging in the behavior or attempting to legally protect or promote it.

At this point, Trump and Bondi are arguably fighting hard to protect pedophiles, so the worst-case situation (2) is almost - but not quite - met.

Jersey Girl could probably pick this apart and explain it better.

[canpakes]

But when your party finds themselves in the minority, you must interfere in any and every way necessary to disenfranchise voters who don't make what you believe to be the right choice.

Like eliminating drop boxes, mounting frivolous voter challenges, anttempting to overturn the vote in court, trying to stop counting when the vote isn’t going your way, eliminating a ‘vote by mail’ option, or by enacting the SAVE Act.

[ajax18]

But when your party finds themselves in the minority, you must interfere in any and every way necessary to disenfranchise voters who don't make what you believe to be the right choice.

Like eliminating drop boxes, mounting frivolous voter challenges, anttempting to overturn the vote in court, trying to stop counting when the vote isn’t going your way, eliminating a ‘vote by mail’ option, or by enacting the SAVE Act.

Yes, the SAVE Act is Jim Crow 2.0 because we all know that black people don't have IDs like white people do. Even to me that argument sounds racist.