Who Killed Joseph Smith?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
I Have Questions
God
Posts: 4269
Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am

Re: Who Killed Joseph Smith?

Post by I Have Questions »

malkie wrote:
Fri Feb 13, 2026 11:27 pm
I Have Questions wrote:
Fri Feb 13, 2026 6:13 pm
I’d love for an apologist to put forward the idea that they didn’t. Because they are then saying that the First Presidency cannot be trusted to seek God’s input into the big decisions affecting Church policy. It opens the door to the last two hundred years of Mormonism being simply men cosplaying the role of Prophets and conning the members.
Either the First Presidency cannot be trusted to seek God’s input into the big decisions, or the First Presidency does not want God’s input into the big decisions in case it conflicts with their preferences, following the principle that if you don't like the answer, you shouldn't have asked the question.
There isn't a scenario now, in a post-SEC Investigation Mormonism, that one can state categorically that the First Presidency is worthy of trust. They've shown, across the last two sets of men in the First Presidency (and the Presiding Bishoprics for that matter), that they cannot be trusted to make morally proper decisions even on really big matters. We know for a fact that they are prepared to be dishonest. And that's that.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
Post Reply