For believing members of the church with a testimony there are certain certainties that come into play which add to the core testimony and belief in the restoration. Those that I've mentioned would be right up there on the top. Understandably, you and other critics of the restoration would look for and find insurmountable (your reasoning) holes in those certainties. [SNIP!]
OK. That's weird. I had posted a response to Shades just before my last post. It had posted. I come back later and it's not there. That's a first. What gives?
OK. That's weird. I had posted a response to Shades just before my last post. It had posted. I come back later and it's not there. That's a first. What gives?
Regards,
MG
That definitely sounds legitimate. Happens all the time to all of us. Absolutely a common occurrence. For sure you are not lying.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
