When the demand for racism excedes the supply

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

- stupid noises -

Why hasn’t Dump sued this Congressman?

[huckelberry]

Throwing a bunch of fish food in the water to attract fish to catch is generally against sport fishing rules because it is hard on fish population.it sounds like that was the strategy here. I do not know if it breaks laws but it certainly did not cause Biden to be come president and it seems unlikely to create any racism. It did lure folks into revealing racism.

[Dr Exiled]

Throwing a bunch of fish food in the water to attract fish to catch is generally against sport fishing rules because it is hard on fish population.it sounds like that was the strategy here. I do not know if it breaks laws but it certainly did not cause Biden to be come president and it seems unlikely to create any racism. It did lure folks into revealing racism.

First of all, Trump, our israeli controlled president, is a clown and a war criminal and his Epstein cover-up DOJ cannot be trusted to prosecute a parking ticket let alone the SPLC. However, it seems that the SPLC has gone a little too far over the years in its "racism is everywhere strategy" and I wouldn't be surprised if they were paying informants and perhaps paid them to create mischief that could then be exaggerated and blamed on those "terrorist" MAGA republicans. It's part of a "strategy of tension" like method used by our donor class together with the intelligence agencies to keep us fighting each other instead of getting together to topple the real enemy, which is them. Politics has always been about exaggerating incidences and then attempting to label the group as being just like the current nut in the news.

[Some Schmo]

To do so, he would have to state that he believes that (a) the SPLC uses mind-control to force white supremacists to do stupid racist things, which would then require that he (b) admits that white supremacists do stupid racist things.

(Bolded italics added).

Just a small nitpick: "stupid racist things" is redundant. If it's racist, it's stupid.

[huckelberry]

Throwing a bunch of fish food in the water to attract fish to catch is generally against sport fishing rules because it is hard on fish population.it sounds like that was the strategy here. I do not know if it breaks laws but it certainly did not cause Biden to be come president and it seems unlikely to create any racism. It did lure folks into revealing racism.

First of all, Trump, our israeli controlled president, is a clown and a war criminal and his Epstein cover-up DOJ cannot be trusted to prosecute a parking ticket let alone the SPLC. However, it seems that the SPLC has gone a little too far over the years in its "racism is everywhere strategy" and I wouldn't be surprised if they were paying informants and perhaps paid them to create mischief that could then be exaggerated and blamed on those "terrorist" MAGA republicans. It's part of a "strategy of tension" like method used by our donor class together with the intelligence agencies to keep us fighting each other instead of getting together to topple the real enemy, which is them. Politics has always been about exaggerating incidences and then attempting to label the group as being just like the current nut in the news.

Exiled,
I do not see anything wrong with payng informants or paying for information. I am not aware of anyway it would be illegal. Providing some funds so a bunch of white supremacists can get together for a protest is a clever manipulation setting a simple trap for some politians. Not quite as morally sound but not illegal to my knowledge. Now paying some folks to break the law would cross a line into criminal action. I hope SPLC has not done that. If so legal action against them would be appropriate.

Trump grabs any sort of thing in order to pretend he did not lose that election.

[Dr Exiled]

First of all, Trump, our israeli controlled president, is a clown and a war criminal and his Epstein cover-up DOJ cannot be trusted to prosecute a parking ticket let alone the SPLC. However, it seems that the SPLC has gone a little too far over the years in its "racism is everywhere strategy" and I wouldn't be surprised if they were paying informants and perhaps paid them to create mischief that could then be exaggerated and blamed on those "terrorist" MAGA republicans. It's part of a "strategy of tension" like method used by our donor class together with the intelligence agencies to keep us fighting each other instead of getting together to topple the real enemy, which is them. Politics has always been about exaggerating incidences and then attempting to label the group as being just like the current nut in the news.

Exiled,
I do not see anything wrong with payng informants or paying for information. I am not aware of anyway it would be illegal. Providing some funds so a bunch of white supremacists can get together for a protest is a clever manipulation setting a simple trap for some politians. Not quite as morally sound but not illegal to my knowledge. Now paying some folks to break the law would cross a line into criminal action. I hope SPLC has not done that. If so legal action against them would be appropriate.

Trump grabs any sort of thing in order to pretend he did not lose that election.

Trump opens his mouth and usually lies. I would impeach him for being disloyal to the US and being controlled by a foreign country, for starting an illegal war and being a war criminal. However, that is obviously a bridge too far given how congress is controlled by the same elements and loves war. Perhaps they can make something up like the last times to do another political hit job. That would be in line with pushing the country to civil war like the powers that be seem to want. Anyway, he needs to be impeached.

About SPLC, again, I wouldn't be surprised if they paid people to commit criminal acts so the other side could be blamed. The Republicans had a history of doing that to squelch valid protests when they controlled or were the party of the FBI and the intelligence agencies. Now it looks like the Democrats are taking their place to counter populism and the SPLC is in lock step with them. The government, whichever party is in control, loves to call those that oppose the donor class as "terrorists" and create crime to stop political movements. The FBI loves to set people up like in the Michigan governor case and the supposed "terrorist" cases during the Bush II admin. Entrapment is a thing and having an outside organization do the setting up is a better way to get around the entrapment defense.

I guess we will see what comes of this case. Kash Patel is a clown and the DOJ are a bunch of political hacks that make up cases for politics sake, so even if there was a case, I doubt it'll go far.

[ajax18]

so even if there was a case, I doubt it'll go far.

Most of these cases are tried under liberal judges and juries are pulled from areas where the population is 96% Democrat. Of course it won't go far. That doesn't change the fact that SPLC is not the FBI and has no right to pay informants. It certainly has no right to fund the few idiotic Klansmen who are left to encourage them to do something stupid because there's just not enough actual racism out there to get black men angry enough at white people to get them back on the Democrat plantation and voting for their own enslavement to the feminists in the family court system. Nor to vote for their own replacement by 3rd world immigrants who will work for less. Racial division has always benefited the left, not the right.

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

— stupid noises —

[canpakes]

Most of these cases are tried under liberal judges and juries are pulled from areas where the population is 96% Democrat.

That’s the usual claim, but it never really stands up under scrutiny.

Of course it won't go far. That doesn't change the fact that SPLC is not the FBI and has no right to pay informants.

It might. That’s the core issue. Your opening post has misrepresented the facts and figures associated with the case; it’s a bit more detailed than what you presented:

“Broadly, the indictment claims that the SPLC defrauded its donors by paying around $3 million for information from people associated with extremist groups between 2014 and 2023 — roughly $333,000 annually — as part of its intelligence gathering operations.

But the DOJ specifically alleges that six alleged money transfers totaling $13,905 from an Alabama-based bank account to informants’ accounts in April 2023 constituted wire fraud because donors were not informed of those individual transactions.

The document also asserts that the SPLC made four false statements to a bank insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation while creating shell companies to disguise the fact that informants were receiving payments from the center. The DOJ claims that SPLC employees told a bank that they were the sole proprietors of accounts for the fake companies.

However, after the bank conducted a review of the accounts, the center acknowledged that those accounts were opened for the SPLC’s benefit and closed them. To prove the bank fraud charges, prosecutors will have to show that the SPLC and its employees voluntarily, intentionally and deliberately made false statements.

Notably, the indictment was only against the SPLC itself. None of its employees or leadership were named. However, at a press conference Tuesday, Blanche — who is currently jockeying to lead the DOJ permanently — said the department’s investigation was ongoing and that it may seek additional charges.

Though the document repeatedly claims that the SPLC never disclosed payments to donors, the center actively fundraises on its stated mission of investigating and exposing white supremacist and extremist groups. It has also regularly provided information about hate groups to the FBI and other law enforcement agencies.

“The only fraud here seems to be on the part of the U.S. on the grand jury and public,” former federal prosecutor Andrew Weissmann said on social media.”*

It certainly has no right to fund the few idiotic Klansmen who are left to encourage them to do something stupid because there's just not enough actual racism out there to get black men angry enough at white people to get them back on the Democrat plantation and voting for their own enslavement to the feminists in the family court system.

Unless you can prove that SPLC informants thought up and organized the ‘Unite the Right’ rally, as example, then your claim doesn’t hold water. Same for (from your opening post) “an informant (stole) 25 boxes of documents from the neo-Nazi group called the National Alliance.” How did stealing boxes of documents from neo-Nazis ‘encourage’ (cool weasel word) or cause the neo-Nazis to do neo-Nazi things? Mind control, again?

And what does any of this have to do with the 2020 election? Just how butthurt is Trump over his loss that he’s trying to link that to this indictment?

Nor to vote for their own replacement by 3rd world immigrants who will work for less. Racial division has always benefited the left, not the right.

Beside the fact that the fellow you voted into office asserted on live national TV that immigrants were eating people’s pets, I find it somewhat ironic that a statement by you claiming that “racial division has always benefited the left, not the right” was immediately preceded by your blame of “3rd world immigrants” for your problems. Good job.


*from Democracy Docket: https://www.democracydocket.com/news-al ... d-charges/

[huckelberry]

so even if there was a case, I doubt it'll go far.

Most of these cases are tried under liberal judges and juries are pulled from areas where the population is 96% Democrat. Of course it won't go far. That doesn't change the fact that SPLC is not the FBI and has no right to pay informants. It certainly has no right to fund the few idiotic Klansmen who are left to encourage them to do something stupid because there's just not enough actual racism out there to get black men angry enough at white people to get them back on the Democrat plantation and voting for their own enslavement to the feminists in the family court system. Nor to vote for their own replacement by 3rd world immigrants who will work for less. Racial division has always benefited the left, not the right.

Ajax, I do not know how much family court would be democrate .I think Republicans have supported child support obligations and a legal lean towards mothers. Women are in both parties.

I live in the half of Washington state which is very Republican. It naturally is the agricultural half with fruit and other crops needing seasonal labor. For many decades much of that labor travels north from across the border. Different decades past have had different legal arrangement. Not all of the labor was legal but the republican growers were glad to get crops picked. It is not some conspiracy of liberals.

Labor traveling north across the southern boarder has been going on for over a century. What in the world plantation for blacks are you thinking of? Welfare? Why would Democrats want to keep blacks on welfare? There are plenty of whites there already. Actually Democrats hope welfare recipients find jobs and stop receiving welfare benefits. The money could be used better and work is an important good for people.