Jehova’s Witnesses reverse policy on transfusions

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
drumdude
God
Posts: 8094
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:29 am

Jehova’s Witnesses reverse policy on transfusions

Post by drumdude »

https://www.jw.org/en/library/series/mo ... iew-blood/

It’s always sad to consider how much completely unnecessary damage religions do in the name of God until they’re finally begrudgingly forced to stop doing that damage.

Much like Mormons not drinking coffee, this was a well known ridiculous restriction that JW’s had to follow. It led to countless deaths including of children.

Mormonism, 7th Day Adventism, JWs, and other restorationist religions are finally starting to regret that their quirky peculiarities are a big liability. Changes are slowly trickling out. Garments that show shoulders. Softer messaging about the sins of homosexuality. Caffeinated sodas in the BYU vending machines. You can almost imagine a revelation that the Book of Mormon is ahistorical in the distant future.

It’s progress of a kind, and perhaps DCP can include this good news about this sister religion in his Hitchens file entry.
I Have Questions
God
Posts: 4313
Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am

Re: Jehova’s Witnesses reverse policy on transfusions

Post by I Have Questions »

The coffee thing is interesting because it isn’t part of the scriptural doctrine of the Word of Wisdom. That doctrine forbids hot drinks. Period. The amendment to rule in all hot drinks that aren’t tea or coffee complicates matters. People have assumed that’s to do with caffeine content, but then all sorts of products that aren't embargoed include caffeine. And Church leaders have said caffeine isn’t specifically embargoed. So in what way is tea and coffee harmful outside of the caffeine content of both, and say hot chocolate isn’t? Church Leaders won’t answer that, they will simply say God has decided that distinction, for some unknown reason. I don’t think Church Leaders have a defensible position that says they are right to single out tea and coffee for health reasons. And, as it happens, the notion that hot drinks are bad “for the belly” is unsupportable.

I think the general principle about eating things in season, having a balanced diet, minimise meat consumption, exercise regularly, avoid alcohol and recreational drugs, is sensible health advice. And the key word is moderation. I know many members who don’t drink tea and coffee but who consume to excess. They are temple recommend holders - how?



I note that the retraction by the JW’s on blood transfusions goes to great lengths to say that they were right to embargo’s it in the first place. Even though they are changing the policy now.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
Post Reply