Revisiting Why Board Members And Moderators Protect DrCamnPP And Bishop Schmo.
- Hound of Heaven
- God
- Posts: 1224
- Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2023 5:13 pm
Revisiting Why Board Members And Moderators Protect DrCamnPP And Bishop Schmo.
In the past week i have had two threads specifically posted in this forum to ask me questions and now I've had a Megathread opened to compile my complaints about others.
So, I'm going to use this thread to try to figure out why board members and moderators alike seem to go out of their way to protect DrCamnPP and Bishop Schmo allowing them to complain, demean and insult board members while holding me to a different set of rules entirely!
I mean, if GadiSCAMton can start a thread to ask me questions and everybody wang dumb can start a thread to ask me questions, I should be able to start a thread to ask why everyone protects two of the most anal board members that insult, demean and viciously attack on a daily basis!
So please share your opinions! I'll be posting screenshots of DrCamnPP, Bishop Schmo and Canpakes complaining about other board members here in this thread while Canpakes and Shades dump my Complaints in my very own MEGATHREAD!
So, I'm going to use this thread to try to figure out why board members and moderators alike seem to go out of their way to protect DrCamnPP and Bishop Schmo allowing them to complain, demean and insult board members while holding me to a different set of rules entirely!
I mean, if GadiSCAMton can start a thread to ask me questions and everybody wang dumb can start a thread to ask me questions, I should be able to start a thread to ask why everyone protects two of the most anal board members that insult, demean and viciously attack on a daily basis!
So please share your opinions! I'll be posting screenshots of DrCamnPP, Bishop Schmo and Canpakes complaining about other board members here in this thread while Canpakes and Shades dump my Complaints in my very own MEGATHREAD!
-
drumdude
- God
- Posts: 8103
- Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:29 am
Re: Revisiting Why Board Members And Moderators Protect DrCamnPP And Bishop Schmo.
Can we get hound a safe space?
- Limnor
- God
- Posts: 1776
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2023 12:55 am
Re: Revisiting Why Board Members And Moderators Protect DrCamnPP And Bishop Schmo.
This seems resolvable through a phone call or lunch meeting with the moderators.
- canpakes
- God
- Posts: 10639
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:25 am
-
drumdude
- God
- Posts: 8103
- Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:29 am
- Gadianton
- God
- Posts: 6812
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 11:56 pm
- Location: Elsewhere
Re: Revisiting Why Board Members And Moderators Protect DrCamnPP And Bishop Schmo.
How about lunch with the board owner?
"...gain control of land that FARMS owned..." -- Bill Hamblin
"Why did FARMS own land to begin with?" -- Me
"Why did FARMS own land to begin with?" -- Me
- ceeboo
- God
- Posts: 1986
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2021 1:22 pm
Re: Revisiting Why Board Members And Moderators Protect DrCamnPP And Bishop Schmo.
If it were just defending, that would be bad enough. It's far worse.Hound of Heaven wrote: ↑Sun Sep 20, 2026 2:20 pmSo, I'm going to use this thread to try to figure out why board members and moderators alike seem to go out of their way to protect DrCamnPP and Bishop Schmo allowing them to complain, demean and insult board members....
It's the open celebrating and admiration (while never challenging) that speaks the loudest.
In my mind, those who express open admiration/celebration/praise/applause about such things are one very small step away from writing said things themselves.
In other words, if they had the courage (or at least didn't have some small measure of personal restraint) they too would be littering the board with the very same repulsive content.
How does someone look past such disgust while expressing admiration/praise? I have no answers.
- canpakes
- God
- Posts: 10639
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:25 am
Re: Revisiting Why Board Members And Moderators Protect DrCamnPP And Bishop Schmo.
This thread is very meta. : D
- Doctor CamNC4Me
- God
- Posts: 11095
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:04 am
Re: Revisiting Why Board Members And Moderators Protect DrCamnPP And Bishop Schmo.
*snowflake stuff*

Hiring a part-time news entertainment anchor as SecDef, what could go wrong?
- Some Schmo
- God
- Posts: 4049
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:21 am
Re: Revisiting Why Board Members And Moderators Protect DrCamnPP And Bishop Schmo.
This is coming from the guy who voted for a rapist/fraudster/pathological liar.ceeboo wrote: ↑Tue Sep 22, 2026 11:34 amIf it were just defending, that would be bad enough. It's far worse.Hound of Heaven wrote: ↑Sun Sep 20, 2026 2:20 pm
So, I'm going to use this thread to try to figure out why board members and moderators alike seem to go out of their way to protect DrCamnPP and Bishop Schmo allowing them to complain, demean and insult board members....
It's the open celebrating and admiration (while never challenging) that speaks the loudest.
In my mind, those who express open admiration/celebration/praise/applause about such things are one very small step away from writing said things themselves.
In other words, if they had the courage (or at least didn't have some small measure of personal restraint) they too would be littering the board with the very same repulsive content.
How does someone look past such disgust while expressing admiration/praise? I have no answers.
Indeed, how does someone look past such disgust while expressing admiration/praise? I have no answers.
Religion is for people whose existential fear is greater than their common sense. It's also the favored cover for hypocrites.
The god idea is popular with desperate people.
The god idea is popular with desperate people.