Witnesses: The Reverend’s Review
Re: Witnesses: The Reverend’s Review
Professor DCP imho never recently spent anytime preparing for his lectures/classes. I am almost sure he had a
Graduate student assistant collect and grade work by the students. I will also bet he has put almost zero effort in preparing tests or final exams and his office time for students was nil because of his travels.
Thus DCP has been full time engaged on his blog and interpreter, outside tours and firesides internationally, and cozy dinners and plays with Mrs DCP and their elitist friends- did I forget his foray into movie making and fund raising with meetings and trips and scripts to read and ponder? DCP places teaching on the lowest rung of the work ladder, even though I am sure he received a healthy salary more than $100k per year plus benefits. If I were Dan and the above is true I could not in good conscience take the BYU money! Would you?
Thus I see no change in his daily mopoletic output!
He will have some time for extra helpings of Krispy Kreme’s!
Just postulatin
k
Graduate student assistant collect and grade work by the students. I will also bet he has put almost zero effort in preparing tests or final exams and his office time for students was nil because of his travels.
Thus DCP has been full time engaged on his blog and interpreter, outside tours and firesides internationally, and cozy dinners and plays with Mrs DCP and their elitist friends- did I forget his foray into movie making and fund raising with meetings and trips and scripts to read and ponder? DCP places teaching on the lowest rung of the work ladder, even though I am sure he received a healthy salary more than $100k per year plus benefits. If I were Dan and the above is true I could not in good conscience take the BYU money! Would you?
Thus I see no change in his daily mopoletic output!
He will have some time for extra helpings of Krispy Kreme’s!
Just postulatin
k
Re: Witnesses: The Reverend’s Review
“The past no longer belongs only to those who once lived it; the past belongs to those who claim it, and are willing to
explore it, and to infuse it with meaning for those alive today.”—Margaret Atwood
explore it, and to infuse it with meaning for those alive today.”—Margaret Atwood
-
Philo Sofee
- God
- Posts: 5071
- Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 1:18 am
Re: Witnesses: The Reverend’s Review
And do it correctly. If he wouldn't take it personally, I would more than gladly be his foil, the counterpart, the defender of atheism, and give him the most serious run for his money he has ever had. I would love to see him really do something significant with something significant instead of piddly Mormon apologetics. This subject is exactly what the world needs. I would love to see him step up to the plate and do his best... I mean, why defend Joseph Smith when you can instead go for the Grand Slam of them all and defend and show/prove the probability of God? well, I mean, one can dream can't one?Kishkumen wrote: ↑Sat Jul 17, 2021 11:36 pmI agree, Philo. The very best work he has done. Let’s see Act II, the post-BYU years. I want to be blown away. I want to see him take on atheism with both barrels.I still think his very best piece was the Asherah in the Book of Mormon, and I am more than happy to give him kudos (which I have done) and credit where credit is due.
Re: Witnesses: The Reverend’s Review
This movie sets a high bar to find an even more handsome Joseph Smith in the future, although they could make him blonder.
Wonder if the Chris Smith narrative Joseph Smith will ever be made into a movie?
Wonder if the Chris Smith narrative Joseph Smith will ever be made into a movie?
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
-
Philo Sofee
- God
- Posts: 5071
- Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 1:18 am
Re: Witnesses: The Reverend’s Review
Hopefully the next group to attempt this kind of project will set different priorities.
“The past no longer belongs only to those who once lived it; the past belongs to those who claim it, and are willing to
explore it, and to infuse it with meaning for those alive today.”—Margaret Atwood
explore it, and to infuse it with meaning for those alive today.”—Margaret Atwood
Re: Witnesses: The Reverend’s Review
If you’ve taught the same class for multiple years, there is little work that has to be put in to creating new material.kairos wrote: ↑Sun Jul 18, 2021 12:12 amProfessor DCP imho never recently spent anytime preparing for his lectures/classes. I am almost sure he had a
Graduate student assistant collect and grade work by the students. I will also bet he has put almost zero effort in preparing tests or final exams and his office time for students was nil because of his travels.
Thus DCP has been full time engaged on his blog and interpreter, outside tours and firesides internationally, and cozy dinners and plays with Mrs DCP and their elitist friends- did I forget his foray into movie making and fund raising with meetings and trips and scripts to read and ponder? DCP places teaching on the lowest rung of the work ladder, even though I am sure he received a healthy salary more than $100k per year plus benefits. If I were Dan and the above is true I could not in good conscience take the BYU money! Would you?
Thus I see no change in his daily mopoletic output!
He will have some time for extra helpings of Krispy Kreme’s!
Just postulatin
k
-
Philo Sofee
- God
- Posts: 5071
- Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 1:18 am
Re: Witnesses: The Reverend’s Review
Yes, the exact complaint Nibley made about the church in his Commencement speech "Leaders and Managers." Managers (like the church leadership) end up boring the absolute hell out of you with the same ole, same ole, while leaders take the bull by the horns, come up with new and exciting, intriguing, and wonderful ways to learning new ideas, mulling extra connections over, and increasing our capacities and IQ's. In short, Leaders are what we need and want, managers is all we have. Leaders help give us further light and knowledge that Father promised. Managers just want obedience to themselves and outdated ideas because they are lazy learners and don't wish to continue climbing the mountain of celestial knowledge, and continually improving life with exciting new discoveries. And they really fear criticism for their dopey, boring views, and hope no one will criticize their laziness even if the criticism is true.Sledge wrote: ↑Sun Jul 18, 2021 2:27 pmIf you’ve taught the same class for multiple years, there is little work that has to be put in to creating new material.kairos wrote: ↑Sun Jul 18, 2021 12:12 amProfessor DCP imho never recently spent anytime preparing for his lectures/classes. I am almost sure he had a
Graduate student assistant collect and grade work by the students. I will also bet he has put almost zero effort in preparing tests or final exams and his office time for students was nil because of his travels.
Thus DCP has been full time engaged on his blog and interpreter, outside tours and firesides internationally, and cozy dinners and plays with Mrs DCP and their elitist friends- did I forget his foray into movie making and fund raising with meetings and trips and scripts to read and ponder? DCP places teaching on the lowest rung of the work ladder, even though I am sure he received a healthy salary more than $100k per year plus benefits. If I were Dan and the above is true I could not in good conscience take the BYU money! Would you?
Thus I see no change in his daily mopoletic output!
He will have some time for extra helpings of Krispy Kreme’s!
Just postulatin
k
- Everybody Wang Chung
- God
- Posts: 1669
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:52 am
Re: Witnesses: The Reverend’s Review
“Sledge” wrote: If you’ve taught the same class for multiple years, there is little work that has to be put in to creating new material.
"I'm on paid sabbatical from BYU in exchange for my promise to use this time to finish two books."
Daniel C. Peterson, 2014
Daniel C. Peterson, 2014
Re: Witnesses: The Reverend’s Review
Shulem wrote: ↑Sat Jul 17, 2021 1:33 amKishkumen wrote: ↑Sat Jul 17, 2021 12:55 amBy the end of the film, I found myself asking, who is this really for? The answer I initially came up with is “struggling/doubting members.” One thing that really impressed me about the film is the way it dramatizes the personal struggles of those who try to live a Mormon life of faith.
Yes, it is for the struggling/doubting members which is at present a large portion of the membership of the church. It's an effort to bring doubters back to the table and feast upon the fruits of Mormonism -- pray, pay, and obey.
For me, Mormonism is dead. An old carcasses covered in flies already eaten of worms. Mormonism grosses me out. It's simply a matter of warning others not to touch the disease and get sick.
It reminds me of the Mash episode where Hawkeye is recounting a dream he had.
Hawkeye: I dreamed I was walking along the beach with my mother. There was this giant bleached-out Frank Burns lying on the sand, his white belly shining in the sun.
Frank: Pierce.
Hawkeye: I said "Mommy, can I touch it?" And she said "Be careful, son. The dullness rubs off."