What it boils down to is not many people care about watching a subpar piece of propaganda. Hopefully, DCP and the Interpreter can learn some valuable lessons for their next film.
Epic fail for the Interpreter.

https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... money.htmlI’ve said that, for us, it’s not really about the money but, really, about the size of the audience that the film can reach. We want it to have an impact. So we want to get it out there on as many screens as we can for as long as we can, and then we’ll turn our attention to DVDs and streaming. (We’re actually already in discussions, and we’ll soon be in negotiations, in that regard.)
However, money is definitely involved. I doubt that making a feature-length film with absolutely no money is even possible, but we certainly didn’t try to do so with Witnesses. Although I’ve earned nothing from the production of the film, and won’t earn anything, some people have. Filmmaking is their profession.
Do we have financial goals for Witnesses? We’ve never really spoken about the matter. It’s genuinely that far down the list of priorities for us.
But, yes, it would be nice if Witnesses could earn back a significant portion of the money that has been spent on its production. It would be very nice if it could recoup all of its costs. And we would be absolutely delighted if it could earn a little profit. What are its odds of doing these things? I have no idea.
$4-5 million? Interesting.Everybody Wang Chung wrote: ↑Sun Jul 25, 2021 1:24 amThe Witnesses has been very disappointing on many different levels. At the premier, DCP told two of my friends/colleagues that he was anticipating the film would bring in around 4-5 million in box office revenue.