Dear Dr. Shades :-) Board Business

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 5500
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: Dear Dr. Shades :-) Board Business

Post by MG 2.0 »

ceeboo wrote:
Fri Sep 10, 2021 1:05 am
MG 2.0 wrote:
Fri Sep 10, 2021 1:02 am


This was of course addressed to Doc Cam. He deserved it.

Regards,
MG
MG - I am sure it was an oversight (I have done it myself) but Lem didn't say that - I think you did. You should probably edit it to correct who said it. (Then I will delete this post)
I think I clarified things at the bottom of page 20. Is there somewhere else where I may have made it sound like I was referring to Lem’s post as “fecal matter”? I never intended to address her in this manner.

It was Doc Cam I was addressing. And like I said, I think he deserved it.

Regards,
MG
User avatar
ceeboo
God
Posts: 1764
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2021 1:22 pm

Re: Dear Dr. Shades :-) Board Business

Post by ceeboo »

Onion
Last edited by ceeboo on Fri Sep 10, 2021 2:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
malkie
God
Posts: 1699
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:41 pm

Re: Dear Dr. Shades :-) Board Business

Post by malkie »

MG 2.0 wrote:
Fri Sep 10, 2021 1:27 am
ceeboo wrote:
Fri Sep 10, 2021 1:05 am


MG - I am sure it was an oversight (I have done it myself) but Lem didn't say that - I think you did. You should probably edit it to correct who said it. (Then I will delete this post)
I think I clarified things at the bottom of page 20. Is there somewhere else where I may have made it sound like I was referring to Lem’s post as “fecal matter”? I never intended to address her in this manner.

It was Doc Cam I was addressing. And like I said, I think he deserved it.

Regards,
MG
Then how can you ever expect others not to respond to you in a way that you don't like - because perhaps they think you deserve it, and you believe that makes it all OK?
You can help Ukraine by talking for an hour a week!! PM me, or check www.enginprogram.org for details.
Слава Україні!, 𝑺𝒍𝒂𝒗𝒂 𝑼𝒌𝒓𝒂𝒊𝒏𝒊!
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 5500
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: Dear Dr. Shades :-) Board Business

Post by MG 2.0 »

Res Ipsa wrote:
Fri Sep 10, 2021 1:26 am
MG 2.0 wrote:
Fri Sep 10, 2021 1:19 am




viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1308&start=160

Regards,
MG
No, CFR on implicit bias.
https://diversity.nih.gov/sociocultural ... licit-bias

Not sure what else you’re looking for.

Regards,
MG
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 5500
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: Dear Dr. Shades :-) Board Business

Post by MG 2.0 »

malkie wrote:
Fri Sep 10, 2021 1:34 am
MG 2.0 wrote:
Fri Sep 10, 2021 1:27 am


I think I clarified things at the bottom of page 20. Is there somewhere else where I may have made it sound like I was referring to Lem’s post as “fecal matter”? I never intended to address her in this manner.

It was Doc Cam I was addressing. And like I said, I think he deserved it.

Regards,
MG
Then how can you ever expect others not to respond to you in a way that you don't like - because perhaps they think you deserve it, and you believe that makes it all OK?
Different beast. Doc is delving into the profane and vulgar.

Regards,
MG
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 5500
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: Dear Dr. Shades :-) Board Business

Post by MG 2.0 »

MG 2.0 wrote:
Fri Sep 10, 2021 1:38 am
malkie wrote:
Fri Sep 10, 2021 1:34 am

Then how can you ever expect others not to respond to you in a way that you don't like - because perhaps they think you deserve it, and you believe that makes it all OK?
Different beast. Doc is delving into the profane and vulgar.

Regards,
MG
We are continuing to veer off topic.

Regards,
MG
User avatar
Res Ipsa
God
Posts: 10636
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2020 6:44 pm
Location: Playing Rabbits

Re: Dear Dr. Shades :-) Board Business

Post by Res Ipsa »

MG 2.0 wrote:
Fri Sep 10, 2021 1:36 am
Res Ipsa wrote:
Fri Sep 10, 2021 1:26 am


No, CFR on implicit bias.
https://diversity.nih.gov/sociocultural ... licit-bias

Not sure what else you’re looking for.

Regards,
MG
The existence of implicit bias is established by evidence -- not just accusing people of having it. I don't think you have any idea what my explicit biases are, let alone whatever my implicit biases are. The only bias that recall being accused of on my prior stint was being biased in favor of LDS folks.
he/him
we all just have to live through it,
holding each other’s hands.


— Alison Luterman
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 5500
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: Dear Dr. Shades :-) Board Business

Post by MG 2.0 »

MG 2.0 wrote:
Fri Sep 10, 2021 1:39 am
MG 2.0 wrote:
Fri Sep 10, 2021 1:38 am


Different beast. Doc is delving into the profane and vulgar.

Regards,
MG
We are continuing to veer off topic.

Regards,
MG
Off for now. I’ll check back later. Have a good evening. 🙂

Regards,
MG
User avatar
ceeboo
God
Posts: 1764
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2021 1:22 pm

Re: Dear Dr. Shades :-) Board Business

Post by ceeboo »

Mustard
Last edited by ceeboo on Fri Sep 10, 2021 2:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
ceeboo
God
Posts: 1764
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2021 1:22 pm

Re: Dear Dr. Shades :-) Board Business

Post by ceeboo »

Ketchup
Post Reply