So. Russia hacked us.

[canpakes]

I asked you to provide evidence that Swalwell was complicit in any activity beyond having known Christine Fang.

There’s the problem. You asked subs for evidence.

subs doesn’t do evidence. Only innuendo.

[subgenius]

The idea Swalwell had any kind of relations with Fang is an invention by right wing media.

CFR (without a quote from Swalwell)

[honorentheos]

The idea Swalwell had any kind of relations with Fang is an invention by right wing media.

CFR (without a quote from Swalwell)

You have the original requirement of showing this didn't originate from innuendo. You can't. You'll innuendo this with a, "you can't prove he didn't" argument and at that point prove its BS.

[Philo Sofee]

CFR (without a quote from Swalwell)

You have the original requirement of showing this didn't originate from innuendo. You can't. You'll innuendo this with a, "you can't prove he didn't" argument and at that point prove its crap.

Properly schooling Jenius. Well done. Course, you are talking over his poor head with this First Grade level analysis, can you tone it down for his sake, say to the 2 year old level so he can grasp its significance? It might help him out...

[subgenius]

CFR (without a quote from Swalwell)

You have the original requirement of showing this didn't originate from innuendo. You can't. You'll innuendo this with a, "you can't prove he didn't" argument and at that point prove its crap.

Great rebuttal, got anything other than presupposition?

[canpakes]

... got anything other than presupposition?

You should ask yourself this before you post in any thread. It would dramatically reduce your time spent posting.

[subgenius]

... got anything other than presupposition?

You should ask yourself this before you post in any thread. It would dramatically reduce your time spent posting.

when in Rome...

[honorentheos]

You have the original requirement of showing this didn't originate from innuendo. You can't. You'll innuendo this with a, "you can't prove he didn't" argument and at that point prove its crap.

Great rebuttal, got anything other than presupposition?

Yeah. The facts as they have already been presented. And you are here trying to spend counterfeit currency which is innuendo.

Anyway thanks for putting the bow on this now. Commenting without providing evidence once called on it should leave no doubt in anyone's mind that this is just conservative news confederate dollars. Or kirkland bank notes? Take your pick.

[canpakes]

when in Rome...

... try the cacio e pepe.