I honestly believe...

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_KimberlyAnn
_Emeritus
Posts: 3171
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 2:03 pm

Post by _KimberlyAnn »

Rcrocket, do you wish the Mormon church would disclose it's financial information?

KA
_rcrocket

Post by _rcrocket »

KimberlyAnn wrote:Rcrocket, do you wish the Mormon church would disclose it's financial information?

KA


For professional and ethical reasons I cannot answer that particular question, given some of my clients I represent. I can argue why it doesn't have to do so.
_asbestosman
_Emeritus
Posts: 6215
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:32 pm

Post by _asbestosman »

rcrocket wrote:If you must write anonymously, it means you have something to hide.

If you wear pants, you have something to hide (perhaps what your'e hiding behind pants is that you have nothing to hide) ;)

Yes, I have something to hide by writing anonymously. I am trying to protect my family, and home from the nut jobs that exist online. Maybe someone doesn't like my comments on sexuality and wishes to take it out on me. Maybe someone was offended by something I said and that someone wishes to get revenge by harming my family. I'm not willing to take the chance. For those who know me personally, they either know who I am online or they could easily figure it out. It is the online nutjobs I don't know who I fear.
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy.
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO
_truth dancer
_Emeritus
Posts: 4792
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:40 pm

Post by _truth dancer »

I can argue why it doesn't have to do so.


I do not believe anyone has even suggested let alone stated that the church doesn't have to do so.

I don't think anyone is going to debate this.

The question is, is the church purposely NOT disclosing information.

~dancer~
"The search for reality is the most dangerous of all undertakings for it destroys the world in which you live." Nisargadatta Maharaj
_asbestosman
_Emeritus
Posts: 6215
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:32 pm

Post by _asbestosman »

truth dancer wrote:The question is, is the church purposely NOT disclosing information.

Maybe the church, like anonymous writers, has something to hide?
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy.
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO
_Some Schmo
_Emeritus
Posts: 15602
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:59 pm

Post by _Some Schmo »

asbestosman wrote:
rcrocket wrote:If you must write anonymously, it means you have something to hide.

If you wear pants, you have something to hide (perhaps what your'e hiding behind pants is that you have nothing to hide) ;)

Yes, I have something to hide by writing anonymously. I am trying to protect my family, and home from the nut jobs that exist online. Maybe someone doesn't like my comments on sexuality and wishes to take it out on me. Maybe someone was offended by something I said and that someone wishes to get revenge by harming my family. I'm not willing to take the chance. For those who know me personally, they either know who I am online or they could easily figure it out. It is the online nutjobs I don't know who I fear.


You beat me to making a post very similar to this. Good job!
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.
_rcrocket

Post by _rcrocket »

asbestosman wrote:
rcrocket wrote:If you must write anonymously, it means you have something to hide.

If you wear pants, you have something to hide (perhaps what your'e hiding behind pants is that you have nothing to hide) ;)

Yes, I have something to hide by writing anonymously. I am trying to protect my family, and home from the nut jobs that exist online. Maybe someone doesn't like my comments on sexuality and wishes to take it out on me. Maybe someone was offended by something I said and that someone wishes to get revenge by harming my family. I'm not willing to take the chance. For those who know me personally, they either know who I am online or they could easily figure it out. It is the online nutjobs I don't know who I fear.


Then, my position is that you shouldn't be posting at all. Rapists try to protect themselves from retributive justice by doing their deeds in the dark, with a mask or anonymously. Libelers protect themselves from angry injured parties by saying wrong things on boards like this.

If you can't stand behind the things you say, and you have to hide behind a telephone pole or a building to use a bullhorn to say things that might hurt, might attack, or might even disparage a religious belief (anonymously throwing turds on the roof of the synagogue because you don't like the Jewish faith), then you are a weak and immoral coward. God knows who you are. And, if there is a God in heaven, I believe that someday you'll be made to pay -- the grief of your parents, wife, children and descendants.
_KimberlyAnn
_Emeritus
Posts: 3171
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 2:03 pm

Post by _KimberlyAnn »

rcrocket wrote:
KimberlyAnn wrote:Rcrocket, do you wish the Mormon church would disclose it's financial information?

KA


For professional and ethical reasons I cannot answer that particular question, given some of my clients I represent. I can argue why it doesn't have to do so.


Yesterday, when you composed the reply to Solomarineris indicating that would like to see the Mormon church disclose it's financial information, did you do it knowing it was a breach of ethics? Or did you only realize that afterward and then edit your reply?

KA
_rcrocket

Post by _rcrocket »

KimberlyAnn wrote:
rcrocket wrote:
KimberlyAnn wrote:Rcrocket, do you wish the Mormon church would disclose it's financial information?

KA


For professional and ethical reasons I cannot answer that particular question, given some of my clients I represent. I can argue why it doesn't have to do so.


Yesterday, when you composed the reply to Solomarineris indicating that would like to see the Mormon church disclose it's financial information, did you do it knowing it was a breach of ethics? Or did you only realize that afterward and then edit your reply?

KA


The latter, and if is still out there I take it back. It is not so much as "breaching" ethics as to be conservative as to not say something one of my First Amendment clients may take issue with some day.
Last edited by _rcrocket on Wed May 14, 2008 8:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
_Scottie
_Emeritus
Posts: 4166
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:54 pm

Post by _Scottie »

rcrocket wrote: Rapists try to protect themselves from retributive justice by doing their deeds in the dark, with a mask or anonymously.

Are you SERIOUSLY comparing us posting on a mostly insignificant message board to a rapist????
If there's one thing I've learned from this board, it's that consensual sex with multiple partners is okay unless God commands it. - Abman

I find this place to be hostile toward all brands of stupidity. That's why I like it. - Some Schmo
Post Reply