John Larsen wrote:You think so eh? Unless they have changed the way the do linguistics since I graduated, your opinion doesn't matter for much. Nothing personal. Science is based on evidence and method. Not on well educated hunches--unless those hunches are validated through experimentation.
Not a very creative way to flippantly dismiss a methodology that conflicts with your a priori assumptions.
John Larsen wrote:Once again, how do you know that your "2000" similarities are not then norm. So far the only answer you have given is that you happen to "speak" 4 languages.
Actually comparative Semitics is what provides the real insight. Like I said before, you can't find that in any two unrelated languages. You know you can't possibly engage that fact, so you just have to try to dismiss it. Not very objective argumentation.