bcspace wrote:
When you realize that it's all anonymous (if you make it that way), potshots should come off you like water off a duck's back.
I don't think Dan or Bob would appreciate that.
bcspace wrote:
When you realize that it's all anonymous (if you make it that way), potshots should come off you like water off a duck's back.
When you realize that it's all anonymous (if you make it that way), potshots should come off you like water off a duck's back.I don't think Dan or Bob would appreciate that.
Gad said Scratch's thread (Survivor?) had 32 replies. The roll call I did had 41. I looked back to the Jersey Girl/Mod poll and that had 53. So the board runs say, 40+ regular posters.
Jersey Girl wrote:Ray,
What you say about the posters who have discontinued participation here on account of the nature of exchanges here is true and while I agree that personal attack will be part of the reason this board fails to grow, I do think another reason is because the board is largely limited to Mormonism as a main theme.
I think that because of that limited theme, this will always be a small community and one that will likely continue without me. It's not that I don't appreciate the spirit in which the board was created, it's that I find it all too confining. I see perhaps one topic looming on the horizon that I would like to engage or at least see played out. Beyond that, I can think of no reason that this board would sustain my interest.
I know Off-Topic isn't a full stadium either.
moksha wrote:I sure wish more Mormons would post here to give this place some balance. There should be something appealing to Mormons to experience an "all voices allowed" type of forum.