ajax18 wrote:She's a congresswoman now. Part of why the left is protecting Biden is not just for the 2020 pesidential campaign but also to protect the lobbyist/government industry that feeds the swamp. Obama, Clinton, Biden, and even Republicans like Trent Lott have used their elected status to becone the insanely wealthy people Chap is talking about. This is the status quo in the swamp and Trump has threatened that industry by investigating Hunter Biden.
They've held up commercial flights for hours for Bill Clinton's haircut. Now with a net worth a quarter billion dollars I think the Clinton's can afford a lot of $300 haircuts.
$300 is the normal price of a a middle class hairdo Ajax. That's what women routinely pay, give or take. Even the ones that have jobs that don't involve being in front of cameras constantly.
The story is supposed to be "Oh, look at the hoity toity socialist living in the lap of luxury like a giant hypocrite." This both misunderstands what socialists like her think and how "luxurious" her ability to get her hair done is.
You've decided to thrown in another layer, for no reason at all, implying she can afford *checks notes* $300 because of corruption. Meanwhile, your boy is taking in millions in bribes out in the open and you think it's legit.
It's not a coincidence that people attracted to neo-fascism can't reason their way out of a paper bag. It's a stupid point of view that attracts such people.