I exclude you out of respect...

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_MsJack
_Emeritus
Posts: 4375
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 5:06 am

Re: I exclude you out of respect...

Post by _MsJack »

Some Schmo wrote:So not only do we have mopologetics, we now have sexist apologetics?

The correct term is "gender racism apologetics." Grapologetics for short.
"It seems to me that these women were the head (κεφάλαιον) of the church which was at Philippi." ~ John Chrysostom, Homilies on Philippians 13

My Blogs: Weighted Glory | Worlds Without End: A Mormon Studies Roundtable | Twitter
_just me
_Emeritus
Posts: 9070
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:46 pm

Re: I exclude you out of respect...

Post by _just me »

MsJack wrote:There's a woman right next to Eyring in the Philadelphia Temple groundbreaking ceremony here. Eyring was presiding there. She's got stylin' shoes, too.

Another woman next to Ronald A. Rasband (of the Seventy) who presided over the Phoenix, Arizona groundbreaking here.

Maybe this is just an Oaks thing.


Thank you! I was googling late last night and gave up the search. I wondered if women had ever been included in the groundbreaking.

I wonder if those were local community leaders...
Last edited by Guest on Tue Oct 25, 2011 3:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
~Those who benefit from the status quo always attribute inequities to the choices of the underdog.~Ann Crittenden
~The Goddess is not separate from the world-She is the world and all things in it.~
_Some Schmo
_Emeritus
Posts: 15602
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:59 pm

Re: I exclude you out of respect...

Post by _Some Schmo »

MsJack wrote:
Some Schmo wrote:So not only do we have mopologetics, we now have sexist apologetics?

The correct term is "gender racism apologetics." Grapologetics for short.

Well, it's clear that why me is "grapolling" with something...

ar ar ar
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.
_MsJack
_Emeritus
Posts: 4375
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 5:06 am

Re: I exclude you out of respect...

Post by _MsJack »

just me wrote:I wonder if those were local community leaders...

In the second photo, definitely. The caption listed her as a local community leader of some sort.

In the first photo, I have no idea. She's not on the Philadelphia City Council. One of the articles I found reads, "Those present from the city included: Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter, City Councilman Darrell Clark, and neighbors of the temple’s site at 1739."
"It seems to me that these women were the head (κεφάλαιον) of the church which was at Philippi." ~ John Chrysostom, Homilies on Philippians 13

My Blogs: Weighted Glory | Worlds Without End: A Mormon Studies Roundtable | Twitter
_why me
_Emeritus
Posts: 9589
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:19 pm

Re: I exclude you out of respect...

Post by _why me »

just me wrote:
I am a woman who happens to open doors for men and women. It would be sexist to only open them for women. I especially open them for people who are carrying many items in their arms. I thought that was just common curtesy.

#IMustBeBored


If your dad is still alive you can ask him about the good ol' days when men would open the door for the ladies out of respect. But then again, the guy would also open car doors for ladies too. But back then, ladies were ladies and wanted to be treated as such.

I learned these manners at school and by tradition from the home. It was common for men to open doors for ladies and give them common respect. And of course, we learned to open doors for both men and women who were carrying packages or who needed help. If I would hold the door open for some guy who was not carrying packages or something, he would find it very strange. Remember when one holds open the door the person allows the other person to go ahead of him.

But yea, you are the reason why I wouldn't hold the door open for women of your generation. Your generation has no understanding of being a women and special treatment from men because you are a woman.
I intend to lay a foundation that will revolutionize the whole world.
Joseph Smith


We are “to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to provide for the widow, to dry up the tear of the orphan, to comfort the afflicted, whether in this church, or in any other, or in no church at all…”
Joseph Smith
_why me
_Emeritus
Posts: 9589
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:19 pm

Re: I exclude you out of respect...

Post by _why me »

Some Schmo wrote:So not only do we have mopologetics, we now have sexist apologetics?

Way to go, why me. Don't let anyone stand in the way of the faith you've placed in gender bias.


Yea, I am guilty of opening the doors for women of my generation. Most would think me a chimp if I did not open the door for them and let them go through first. I would be judged not to have manners. So, I am sexist on demand.

But for women of just me generation, I would go through first and let them open their own doors. I certainly don't want to be sexist.
I intend to lay a foundation that will revolutionize the whole world.
Joseph Smith


We are “to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to provide for the widow, to dry up the tear of the orphan, to comfort the afflicted, whether in this church, or in any other, or in no church at all…”
Joseph Smith
_just me
_Emeritus
Posts: 9070
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:46 pm

Re: I exclude you out of respect...

Post by _just me »

Your generation has no understanding of being a women and special treatment from men because you are a woman.


Image

#keepondigging
Last edited by Guest on Tue Oct 25, 2011 8:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
~Those who benefit from the status quo always attribute inequities to the choices of the underdog.~Ann Crittenden
~The Goddess is not separate from the world-She is the world and all things in it.~
_why me
_Emeritus
Posts: 9589
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:19 pm

Re: I exclude you out of respect...

Post by _why me »

MsJack wrote:
Some Schmo wrote:So not only do we have mopologetics, we now have sexist apologetics?

The correct term is "gender racism apologetics." Grapologetics for short.


Actually, the correct term is: to be gentlemanly. But don't worry, the women of your generation can open their own doors and stand on a crowded bus while the men sit.

http://www.therebelution.com/2006/08/mo ... leman.html

A great article about it all by a protestant minister.
I intend to lay a foundation that will revolutionize the whole world.
Joseph Smith


We are “to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to provide for the widow, to dry up the tear of the orphan, to comfort the afflicted, whether in this church, or in any other, or in no church at all…”
Joseph Smith
_MsJack
_Emeritus
Posts: 4375
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 5:06 am

Re: I exclude you out of respect...

Post by _MsJack »

why me ~ This may surprise you, but my husband is kind of an old-fashioned guy in some respects. He likes getting doors for me, for example. I don't really mind his displays of chivalry here or there, so long as they don't get ridiculous or inconvenient.

Where I draw the line is the idea of a man making decisions on a woman's behalf without consulting her, "for her own good." That isn't gentlemanly and it isn't chivalrous. It's paternalistic and infantilizing. If that's what being a "gentleman" means, then I'm glad gentlemen are a dying breed.
"It seems to me that these women were the head (κεφάλαιον) of the church which was at Philippi." ~ John Chrysostom, Homilies on Philippians 13

My Blogs: Weighted Glory | Worlds Without End: A Mormon Studies Roundtable | Twitter
_Lucretia MacEvil
_Emeritus
Posts: 1558
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 7:01 am

Re: I exclude you out of respect...

Post by _Lucretia MacEvil »

just me wrote:
Your generation has no understanding of being a women and special treatment from men because you are a woman.


Image

#keepondigging


Good one.
The person who is certain and who claims divine warrant for his certainty belongs now to the infancy of our species. Christopher Hitchens

Faith does not give you the answers, it just stops you asking the questions. Frater
Post Reply