stemelbow wrote:
Hey Scottie, I can agree with your approach in principle, but why are you assuming apologists think the general population should put any weight in the horse bones have not been found yet? I think the apologists approach is more along the lines of, "there has been reasons given to think there may have been horses in the americas pre-columbus. We don't have any archaeological reasons to see that, but there are other reasons. There may be bones out there somewhere verifying this. We simply don't' know. So we feel comfortable in the faith, for now."
I am unaware of any good reasons to think Horse existed in the Americas during Book of Mormon time lines. No horse remains, or cultural evidence that they existed is present. There may be is just playing the possibility game again. You can do this with anything.