Online Apologetics and "Collateral Damage"

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Rollo Tomasi
_Emeritus
Posts: 4085
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 12:27 pm

Re: Online Apologetics and "Collateral Damage"

Post by _Rollo Tomasi »

Wheat wrote:
(Mister Scratch) I should let you know that my patience for this sort of thing is not unlimited.

This is perhaps the single most ironic thing I have ever read on this message board.

Nah, this beats it hands down:

Bishop Dan wrote:Must kill Scartch. Blood. Violence. Delicious brutality. Guns. Knives. Bombs. Beautiful! Vengeance! Revenge! What lovely images. Must repress them. Mustn't let anybody know. But they're so pleasant!
"Moving beyond apologist persuasion, LDS polemicists furiously (and often fraudulently) attack any non-traditional view of Mormonism. They don't mince words -- they mince the truth."

-- Mike Quinn, writing of the FARMSboys, in "Early Mormonism and the Magic World View," p. x (Rev. ed. 1998)
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Re: Online Apologetics and "Collateral Damage"

Post by _The Nehor »

Mister Scratch wrote:I should let you know that my patience for this sort of thing is not unlimited.


What happens when it runs out? Do you break out your assault rifle?
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: Online Apologetics and "Collateral Damage"

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

Mister Scratch wrote:I should let you know that my patience for this sort of thing is not unlimited.

If you don't want to draw unfavorable comment, maybe you should drop your ceaseless campaign of anonymous character assassination.

Just a thought.

Mister Scratch wrote:Again, it is nice to know what passes for "humor" in your mind, Dan. You yourself are extremely sensitive to "jokes" about your weight.

If I were really that sensitive to exaggerated nonsense about my weight, I would have left the internet years ago.

Mister Scratch wrote:So I have to wonder why you think it is OK to "make funnies" about murdering me.

You're the one who keeps suggesting that I want to murder you. I've expressly denied it, even though I don't think any reasonable person requires such denial from me.

Mister Scratch wrote:On second thought, I've grown quite weary of this crap from you, Dr. Peterson. Death threats are certainly actionable offenses, and I have already told you in no uncertain terms that I don't appreciate you making jokes like this. I'm seriously going to consider passing along your behavior to my attorney.

It will be interesting to see what he makes of your complaint. Please keep me posted.

I've never threatened to murder you. I've never threatened, even, to murder "Mister Scratch," whoever and wherever he or she is. Heck, I haven't even threatened to murder Master Scartch. On the contrary, I've expressly and explicitly and, now, repeatedly denied harboring even the slightest homicidal intent toward anybody at all, let alone against a pseudonymous internet poster whose identity and whereabouts are wholly unknown to me. And anyone actually familiar with my placid and ironic personality won't take your claim at all seriously that I'm a would-be murderer.
_Some Schmo
_Emeritus
Posts: 15602
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:59 pm

Re: Online Apologetics and "Collateral Damage"

Post by _Some Schmo »

Daniel Peterson wrote:
harmony wrote:Maybe "stupid" really does define "academic freedom" in Provo.

Maybe.

But you wouldn't have any real basis to know.

Sure she does. She's got you.
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: Online Apologetics and "Collateral Damage"

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

Heh heh heh. My cunning plan to unmask Master Scartch may be working! If he attempts to sue me, he'll have to reveal his real identity -- which, I'm guessing, isn't "Mister Scratch."
_LifeOnaPlate
_Emeritus
Posts: 2799
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:50 pm

Re: Online Apologetics and "Collateral Damage"

Post by _LifeOnaPlate »

John Larsen wrote:You have Peterson--who is Batman to Hamblin's Robin--openly acknowledging it right here in this thread. What more do you want you weasel.


He acknowledged that you were able to see all of the evidence in the printed review by reading it after hearing about the "butthead" joke? Perhaps we are talking past one another. Your earlier comments made it seem as though you had read the printed review in question and saw evidence of the butthead thing.

Instead, as you pointed out, you saw it discussed elsewhere, as I suspected and noted to Gad above.
One moment in annihilation's waste,
one moment, of the well of life to taste-
The stars are setting and the caravan
starts for the dawn of nothing; Oh, make haste!

-Omar Khayaam

*Be on the lookout for the forthcoming album from Jiminy Finn and the Moneydiggers.*
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: Online Apologetics and "Collateral Damage"

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

Seventy years ago today, the Nazi concentration camp at Mauthausen, Austria, opens its gates.

Forty-five years ago today, Martin Luther King Jr, delivers his famous "I have a dream" speech at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington DC.

Tonight, the first black man ever to be nominated for the presidency by a major political party accepts that nomination.

This afternoon, Master Scartch threatens to sue Dan Peterson over a joke, to destroy Peterson and to wipe out Peterson's life savings and the inheritance of his children.

28 August 2008 -- a watershed day in the history of Mopologetics.

Brought to you by Master Scartch.
_LifeOnaPlate
_Emeritus
Posts: 2799
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:50 pm

Re: Online Apologetics and "Collateral Damage"

Post by _LifeOnaPlate »

Mister Scratch wrote:Edited to add: On second thought, I've grown quite weary of this crap from you, Dr. Peterson. Death threats are certainly actionable offenses, and I have already told you in no uncertain terms that I don't appreciate you making jokes like this. I'm seriously going to consider passing along your behavior to my attorney.


The thing is, you have a very weak case, seeing as how you are an anonymous Internet non-entity called "scartch." It is very difficult to kill those. Essentially, you have no case.
One moment in annihilation's waste,
one moment, of the well of life to taste-
The stars are setting and the caravan
starts for the dawn of nothing; Oh, make haste!

-Omar Khayaam

*Be on the lookout for the forthcoming album from Jiminy Finn and the Moneydiggers.*
_Brackite
_Emeritus
Posts: 6382
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 8:12 am

Re: Online Apologetics and "Collateral Damage"

Post by _Brackite »

The Brackite now really wishes that Mister Scratch and DCP, could get along quite a bit better with each other. The Brackite likes both Mister Scratch and DCP. Maybe sometime in the far future, the three of us can have a nice dinner together. That sounds like it will be a Great idea for sometime, into the distance future. May we all forgive each other, and the three of us get along well now, and be good friends now?
Last edited by MSNbot Media on Thu Aug 28, 2008 9:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"And I've said it before, you want to know what Joseph Smith looked like in Nauvoo, just look at Trump." - Fence Sitter
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Re: Online Apologetics and "Collateral Damage"

Post by _The Nehor »

LifeOnaPlate wrote:
Mister Scratch wrote:Edited to add: On second thought, I've grown quite weary of this crap from you, Dr. Peterson. Death threats are certainly actionable offenses, and I have already told you in no uncertain terms that I don't appreciate you making jokes like this. I'm seriously going to consider passing along your behavior to my attorney.


The thing is, you have a very weak case, seeing as how you are an anonymous Internet non-entity called "scartch." It is very difficult to kill those. Essentially, you have no case.


And if he reveals himself openly then the SCMC will finally have enough information on him to proceed with their plans. Heheheheheeheheh.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
Post Reply