Darth J wrote:mentalgymnast wrote:there seem to be many around these parts that are died in the wool and dogmatically opposed to listening to or reading anything that could alter their set in stone world view in regards to the church and Joseph Smith, so I don't expect there will be many takers on this invite.
Says the person who summarily dismisses the Strangites as a "footnote in history."
mentalgymnast wrote:Which the CofJCofLDS isn't.
See the difference?
Regards,
MG
Of course I see the difference. You are equivocating between relative terms and absolute terms, because folk apologetics, as Stakhanovite as called it, involves a great amount of LDS solipsism.
You are LDS, not a Strangite, so you want to dismiss The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints as a "footnote" because that church is small compared to the number of members that The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints pretends to have. So from your perspective, the Strangites are a footnote to history.
From the perspective of a Strangite, however, they are not history at all, but the church that was restored by the Prophet Joseph Smith and the man the Lord chose as his successor, James Strang.
Because you are LDS, you think that the LDS Church is not merely a footnote to history, based on your perspective that in absolute terms, the number of members the LDS Church pretends to have is significant. But relative to the human race in general, and relative to Islam, Catholicism, Buddhism, Protestantism, etc., Mormonism---whether in general or specifically the LDS version of it---is just a footnote to history.