Big Boobs, Blonde Hair and Blue Eyes and White Skin = Progressive Insanity

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
Post Reply
User avatar
Kishkumen
God
Posts: 10410
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:37 pm
Location: Cassius University
Contact:

Re: Big Boobs, Blonde Hair and Blue Eyes and White Skin = Progressive Insanity

Post by Kishkumen »

Analytics wrote:
Mon Aug 04, 2025 10:32 pm
In any case, that paper makes it clear that “Cultural Marxism”, as Douglas Kellner uses the term, is a version of culture studies that looks at cultural issues through a Marxist paradigm. It isn’t about Marx’s influence on culture--it’s about how you analyze what’s going on. Just as Das Kapital is an analysis of Capitalism from a Marxist perspective, Cultural Marxism is the study of culture from a Marxist perspective.
Well, yes, but the Marxist analysis of culture is part of the culture being analyzed. There is a kind of feedback-loop effect in this. How we understand the world is not divorced from our experience of it and the impact we have on the world we are perceiving. All I know is that I prefer this scenario to having a moronic, vulgar, wannabe dictator decide what reality is for the rest of us.
"He disturbs the laws of his country, he forces himself upon women, and he puts men to death without trial.” ~Otanes on the monarch, Herodotus Histories 3.80.
Dr Exiled
God
Posts: 2249
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:40 pm

Re: Big Boobs, Blonde Hair and Blue Eyes and White Skin = Progressive Insanity

Post by Dr Exiled »

Kishkumen wrote:
Wed Aug 06, 2025 6:32 pm
Analytics wrote:
Mon Aug 04, 2025 10:32 pm
In any case, that paper makes it clear that “Cultural Marxism”, as Douglas Kellner uses the term, is a version of culture studies that looks at cultural issues through a Marxist paradigm. It isn’t about Marx’s influence on culture--it’s about how you analyze what’s going on. Just as Das Kapital is an analysis of Capitalism from a Marxist perspective, Cultural Marxism is the study of culture from a Marxist perspective.
Well, yes, but the Marxist analysis of culture is part of the culture being analyzed. There is a kind of feedback-loop effect in this. How we understand the world is not divorced from our experience of it and the impact we have on the world we are perceiving. All I know is that I prefer this scenario to having a moronic, vulgar, wannabe dictator decide what reality is for the rest of us.
I don't want Miriam Adelson and Netanyahu telling us what to do through their presidential puppet, either. Lol.
Myth is misused by the powerful to subjugate the masses all too often.
User avatar
Kishkumen
God
Posts: 10410
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:37 pm
Location: Cassius University
Contact:

Re: Big Boobs, Blonde Hair and Blue Eyes and White Skin = Progressive Insanity

Post by Kishkumen »

Dr Exiled wrote:
Thu Aug 07, 2025 12:54 am
I don't want Miriam Adelson and Netanyahu telling us what to do through their presidential puppet, either. Lol.
I don’t want crazy plutocrats like Thiel, Musk, Adelson, Murdoch deciding either.
"He disturbs the laws of his country, he forces himself upon women, and he puts men to death without trial.” ~Otanes on the monarch, Herodotus Histories 3.80.
User avatar
Some Schmo
God
Posts: 3987
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:21 am

Re: Big Boobs, Blonde Hair and Blue Eyes and White Skin = Progressive Insanity

Post by Some Schmo »

What bothers me about this whole episode is that Sweeny is not (to me, at least) empirically beautiful. She's average at best. I actually find it sad when a woman's ego seems to be tied to her looks when she might be appealing to a handful of men. This absolutely feels like a case where you're being told what beautiful is rather than judging it for yourself.

So yeah, it feels very emblematic of white supremacy: propping up a thing that isn't even damned real. Her genes are average. I'm not saying she's ugly, but to deify her in this way is damned outrageous to me. I saw a woman on the street today walking her dog I was more attracted to.

ETA: it kind of reminds me of the biggest flaw in the movie Fatal Attraction: you're going to cheat on Anne Archer with Glenn Close? Come on!
Religion is for people whose existential fear is greater than their common sense. It's also the favored cover for hypocrites.

The god idea is popular with desperate people.
User avatar
Doctor CamNC4Me
God
Posts: 10984
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:04 am

Re: Big Boobs, Blonde Hair and Blue Eyes and White Skin = Progressive Insanity

Post by Doctor CamNC4Me »

Hound of Heaven wrote:
Wed Jul 30, 2025 11:05 am
Sidney Sweeney … a white female with large boobs and blonde hair…
Image
wE nEgOtIaTe wItH bOmBs
User avatar
Kishkumen
God
Posts: 10410
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:37 pm
Location: Cassius University
Contact:

Re: Big Boobs, Blonde Hair and Blue Eyes and White Skin = Progressive Insanity

Post by Kishkumen »

Some Schmo wrote:
Sat Aug 09, 2025 4:54 am
What bothers me about this whole episode is that Sweeny is not (to me, at least) empirically beautiful. She's average at best. I actually find it sad when a woman's ego seems to be tied to her looks when she might be appealing to a handful of men. This absolutely feels like a case where you're being told what beautiful is rather than judging it for yourself.

So yeah, it feels very emblematic of white supremacy: propping up a thing that isn't even damned real. Her genes are average. I'm not saying she's ugly, but to deify her in this way is damned outrageous to me. I saw a woman on the street today walking her dog I was more attracted to.

ETA: it kind of reminds me of the biggest flaw in the movie Fatal Attraction: you're going to cheat on Anne Archer with Glenn Close? Come on!
Sexual attraction is a matter of personal taste, no?
"He disturbs the laws of his country, he forces himself upon women, and he puts men to death without trial.” ~Otanes on the monarch, Herodotus Histories 3.80.
User avatar
Some Schmo
God
Posts: 3987
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:21 am

Re: Big Boobs, Blonde Hair and Blue Eyes and White Skin = Progressive Insanity

Post by Some Schmo »

Kishkumen wrote:
Sun Aug 10, 2025 4:47 pm
Sexual attraction is a matter of personal taste, no?
For sure. It's just that if you're going to present someone as representative of "good genes" you should pick someone universally attractive, in my opinion.
Religion is for people whose existential fear is greater than their common sense. It's also the favored cover for hypocrites.

The god idea is popular with desperate people.
Morley
God
Posts: 2647
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 6:17 pm

Re: Big Boobs, Blonde Hair and Blue Eyes and White Skin = Progressive Insanity

Post by Morley »

Some Schmo wrote:
Mon Aug 11, 2025 4:30 am
Kishkumen wrote:
Sun Aug 10, 2025 4:47 pm
Sexual attraction is a matter of personal taste, no?
For sure. It's just that if you're going to present someone as representative of "good genes" you should pick someone universally attractive, in my opinion.
I'm with Kish. There's no such thing,
Morley
God
Posts: 2647
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 6:17 pm

Re: Big Boobs, Blonde Hair and Blue Eyes and White Skin = Progressive Insanity

Post by Morley »

Some Schmo wrote:
Sat Aug 09, 2025 4:54 am
ETA: it kind of reminds me of the biggest flaw in the movie Fatal Attraction: you're going to cheat on Anne Archer with Glenn Close? Come on!
No kidding.
User avatar
canpakes
God
Posts: 10522
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:25 am

Re: Big Boobs, Blonde Hair and Blue Eyes and White Skin = Progressive Insanity

Post by canpakes »

Morley wrote:
Mon Aug 11, 2025 12:11 pm
Some Schmo wrote:
Mon Aug 11, 2025 4:30 am
For sure. It's just that if you're going to present someone as representative of "good genes" you should pick someone universally attractive, in my opinion.
I'm with Kish. There's no such thing,
That’s because you’re an evil Marxist commie libtard radical woke progressive, or something.
Post Reply