Rules and Moderator information

[canpakes]

Check out the ones left behind in the Prison thread. Keep in mind that responses to split posts might also remain in that same split if they keep that conversation more coherent, even if they would not qualify to be split on their own.

So you relocated several posts to spirit prison due to the term sxxxbags? Is that the the less-savory language you're referring to?

Could be. But rather than examine multiple posts singly by one user in a thread designed for general questions, would you like for me to set up a separate thread?

[Hound of Heaven]

So you relocated several posts to spirit prison due to the term sxxxbags? Is that the the less-savory language you're referring to?

Could be. But rather than examine multiple posts singly by one user in a thread designed for general questions, would you like for me to set up a separate thread?

Are you really asking if you can relocate my post? It's worth noting that Jersey Girl accounted for 41% of all the posts within the first ten pages of this thread. She and Marcus account for 51% of all the posts on the first ten pages. If your friends can post freely and utilize this thread, why are you trying to relocate my post again?

[canpakes]

Could be. But rather than examine multiple posts singly by one user in a thread designed for general questions, would you like for me to set up a separate thread?

Are you really asking if you can relocate my post? It's worth noting that Jersey Girl accounted for 41% of all the posts within the first ten pages of this thread. She and Marcus account for 51% of all the posts on the first ten pages. If your friends can post freely and utilize this thread, why are you trying to relocate my post again?

I’d move our conversation into a new thread so that we don’t trample on the function of this thread, with the new thread being focused on this particular conversation.

If not, why not?

[Marcus]

I used to enjoy reading conversations here, but I don't view the crap that spews out of the assholes of the sock puppets of houndDog/Atlantic Mike and Binger/cultellus/mayan elephant /whiskey/author of how to be less dickish to be enjoyable. Apparently, the argument is that we don't 'know' for a goddamn fact that whiskey Is Binger and that HoundDog Mike is Atlantic Mike, so the moderators can't apply the rules. That's because this board exists for entertainment purposes, or something.

What's entertaining about watching Mayan Elephant repeat his slide into the manic phase of his psychiatric illness? What's entertaining about watching Atlantic Mike continue exhibiting his sadism and narcissistic psycopathy? I find intelligent conversations entertaining but they are being swamped by the sockpuppetry of two posters who have stacked up so many rule violations that they could theoretically be banned for decades.

But, they use sock puppets, and apparently rules don't hold up when people change their names and avatars. Other sites have figured this out, which I suppose is why we get all the trash everyone else bans.

"Don't all the nuts roll down to Florida." ---X-files

[Chap]

I used to enjoy reading conversations here, but I don't view the crap that spews out of the assholes of the sock puppets of houndDog/Atlantic Mike and Binger/cultellus/mayan elephant /whiskey/author of how to be less dickish to be enjoyable. Apparently, the argument is that we don't 'know' for a goddamn fact that whiskey Is Binger and that HoundDog Mike is Atlantic Mike, so the moderators can't apply the rules.

I give such sock puppets a run for their money, but after that I simply put them on ignore. That way, if they say anything of interest I shall probably see it in a quotation, but otherwise I am spared the irritation of reading their pointless silliness. Give it a try?

[canpakes]

I used to enjoy reading conversations here, but I don't view the crap that spews out of the assholes of the sock puppets of houndDog/Atlantic Mike and Binger/cultellus/mayan elephant /whiskey/author of how to be less dickish to be enjoyable. Apparently, the argument is that we don't 'know' for a goddamn fact that whiskey Is Binger and that HoundDog Mike is Atlantic Mike, so the moderators can't apply the rules.

Technically, Binger’s resurrection is OK by the rules, as he has had the other two previous primary accounts for board participation ‘deactivated’, likely so that all of that older history won’t be damaging if one of his company’s clients or potential purchasers of his book were to accidentally discover that he spends most of the day harassing folks on the internet.

That makes the new Whiskey account not a sock. Additional sock accounts by him would, of course, change things.

[Marcus]

I used to enjoy reading conversations here, but I don't view the crap that spews out of the assholes of the sock puppets of houndDog/Atlantic Mike and Binger/cultellus/mayan elephant /whiskey/author of how to be less dickish to be enjoyable. Apparently, the argument is that we don't 'know' for a goddamn fact that whiskey Is Binger and that HoundDog Mike is Atlantic Mike, so the moderators can't apply the rules.

Technically, Binger’s resurrection is OK by the rules, as he has had the other two previous primary accounts for board participation ‘deactivated’, likely so that all of that older history won’t be damaging if one of his company’s clients or potential purchasers of his book were to accidentally discover that he spends most of the day harassing folks on the internet.

That makes the new Whiskey account not a sock. Additional sock accounts by him would, of course, change things.

Thanks. How do the "additional sock accounts by" Atlantic Mike "change things"?

[Hound of Heaven]

I used to enjoy reading conversations here, but I don't view the crap that spews out of the assholes of the sock puppets of houndDog/Atlantic Mike and Binger/cultellus/mayan elephant /whiskey/author of how to be less dickish to be enjoyable. Apparently, the argument is that we don't 'know' for a goddamn fact that whiskey Is Binger and that HoundDog Mike is Atlantic Mike, so the moderators can't apply the rules. That's because this board exists for entertainment purposes, or something.

What's entertaining about watching Mayan Elephant repeat his slide into the manic phase of his psychiatric illness? What's entertaining about watching Atlantic Mike continue exhibiting his sadism and narcissistic psycopathy? I find intelligent conversations entertaining but they are being swamped by the sockpuppetry of two posters who have stacked up so many rule violations that they could theoretically be banned for decades.

But, they use sock puppets, and apparently rules don't hold up when people change their names and avatars. Other sites have figured this out, which I suppose is why we get all the trash everyone else bans.

"Don't all the nuts roll down to Florida." ---X-files

I am not Atlantic Mike, and your continued reference to me as that individual clearly indicates to everyone that you are looking for conflict in every discussion you engage in.

In the Terrestrial forum, you trail behind MG2.0 as if you were a reprimanded child, trying to insult him due to your hurt feelings. You continue to talk about the importance of adhering to the rules, yet three weeks ago, Dr. Shades specifically requested that you refrain from calling MG2.0 a fibber. Despite his request, you chose to disregard it, showing a lack of respect for him by continuing to label MG2.0 in that manner, ignoring Shades wishes for his discussion board. For more than 5 years, you have repeatedly referred to MG2.0 as a troll, a loser, and have used various other personal insults in an effort to drive him away from the board. Your actions are immature.

In the paradise forum you follow me, mirroring the actions you take with MG2.0 in the Terrestrial. Your disapproval of my posts leads you to label me as a troll. You consistently criticize me, seemingly trying to convince Dr. Shades to impose a ban on me for having a different opinion. One only needs to examine your posting history to recognize that you exhibit bullying behavior towards those who express differing views from your Marxist progressive ideology.

To you, Subgenius was a troll, Ldsfaqs was a troll, every conservative that has ever posted here has been labeled a troll by you, and every conservative that has posted here is treated differently than your Marxist progressive friends. Your posts reveal the hatred that resides within you. I genuinely feel sympathy for you. Your post clearly reflects a sense of true unhappiness.

Once more, I believe Dr. Shades recognizes that your time on the board for over a decade has involved consistently undermining conservatives, labeling them as trolls or foolish, and manipulating the rules in an effort to silence them, all while exhibiting the same behavior you seek to condemn in others.

[Hound of Heaven]

I'm coming back after sharing my previous post to add this for Dr. Shades to observe your disdain for conservatives. I just read after logging on that you are also requesting Markk to be given some form of restricted posting privileges due to your disagreement with his opinion. That's three conservatives you are wanting to be banned or put on restrictive posting privileges.

I’m unsure if Whiskey aligns with conservative views, so I won’t include him in the list. However, you’re requesting that moderators take action against me, Markk, and MG2.0 simply because you disagree with our expressions on a platform meant for free speech. Your disdain for conservatives is quite apparent, revealing a deepseated hatred that is hard to overlook.

While you advocate for the banning or censoring of conservatives, you seem to overlook your close friend DrCamnPP's posts that dwell in spirit prison that are outright is pornographic! Your attempts to silence those with differing opinions reveals that you only seek to view viewpoints on the board that align with your own. If you truly valued the board, you would voice your concerns about DrCamnPP and also refrain from insulting Dr.Shades every time you accuse him of allowing certain posters to be here only to post for the sake of entertainment.

You are not just an authoritarian, you are also filled with a great deal of hatred!





Three conservatives you want Dr.Shades to take action against. Not one liberal or progressive! I wonder why?

[Marcus]

Lol, we can certainly test it. Say how you really feel about Kirk openly here and we can send it to [snip] and see how they react. He said something insensitive and stupid and he was suspended. There is a long list of others that have done the same and equally paid a price. From Jimmy the Greek, Bill Maher to Rosanne, off the top of my head.

We have freedom of speech, however there are consequences to our speech.

Edited. -c-

Yup, that was a threat addressed to Kishkumen, and that was underlined by his later posts. Markk should be suspended for that in my view. Can we have a ruling from the Mods, please?

This warrants a ban in my opinion. It’s actually a breach of two important board rules. It contains in real life information and contains an in real life threat. We cannot have posters bringing threats of real life harassment to the board. I’ve reported the post and I think a public notification of what action is taken is also warranted on this occasion.

Hey dummy, try reading what they post and actually responding to that next time. And yes, you were obviously threatening him, because he makes you feel stupid, so you hate him. And you are stupid. Just so you know.

Yes, he did threaten me twice, and I agree with those who argue that he should be suspended. If he had threatened anyone else in the same way, I would be saying the same thing. Any poster who resorts to thinly veiled threats to the livelihood of others, especially at a time when we know that a number of people are hunting out political opponents for retribution, should be suspended from the board. It is time to "lower the temperature." Sometimes a time-out is the best medicine. Markk is welcome to share his dumb opinions here freely, but when he threatens people, he has worn out his welcome for the time being.

Markk violated our board rules, and I've seen nothing to indicate he won't make another threat. I would also appreciate hearing what is being done to stop this.